Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dsm69

I am not so sure there needed to be actual physical devices in the tower itself.


148 posted on 03/05/2017 12:45:38 AM PST by PghBaldy (12/14 - 930am -rampage begins... 12/15 - 1030am - Obama's advance team scouts photo-op locations.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies ]


To: PghBaldy

“I am not so sure there needed to be actual physical devices in the tower itself.”

For a land line there would. Especially since a lot of business calls are actually on the internet using software like Sykpe only more secure.


152 posted on 03/05/2017 1:15:18 AM PST by Fai Mao (I still want to see The PIAPS in prison)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies ]

To: PghBaldy

I know from working on a similar problem in of all places the US Embassy in the Soviet Union, there are means to penetrate glass windows with a carrier beam that will return conversations in the room.

The problem was to provide glass that would reflect the beam and also be architecturally acceptable. The issue became moot when it was discovered that bugs had been planted within the building, in the steel as I recall. The glass was that originally selected by the architect, solar gray.


180 posted on 03/05/2017 4:50:07 AM PST by bert (K.E.; N.P.; GOPc;WASP .... Hillary is Ameritrash, pass it on)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson