Posted on 02/10/2017 5:22:10 PM PST by HarleyLady27
Oh, the winning… it’s often too funny. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals is now independently, on its own impetus, requesting an internal vote on a full panel en blanc hearing to review its own decision.
Additionally, the full ninth are asking the Trump administration to file an additional brief telling the court why the three member original appeals ruling authority was wrong. In essence, the smart judges know what wasn’t considered, and are now looking for an out.
You just can’t make this stuff up.
(Excerpt) Read more at theconservativetreehouse.com ...
Fuck them. Deprive all district courts and courts of appeal of jurisdiction over any and all legal matters involving aliens.
What the 3 judge panel did amounted to a Judicial Coup. It sounds like an adult on the court woke up to the fact that the President acted within the law and they want a Judicial do over.
Only 1 judge asked for the review by the whole panel. If a majority of the other justices don’t want it, it won’t happen.
The woman “judge” won the ACLU LGBTQ Award
I heard it also, on regular Fox
Extreme vet the new requests with almost 0 chance of getting approved from 7 countries and do not kill the first EO and let the 9th twist in the wind hoping they did not screw the pooch and let a killer in. Just saying. Check mate MFs in 9th. Sweet dreams.
The full court will have to join hands with the other three suicidal maniacs, and jump off the same cliff, en banc.
Statute law, historical precedent, and the Constitution, support the President's absolute authority in the area of immigration enforcement.
Unless the court has some magical hoodoo they can cast on this issue, they don't have a leg to stand on.
I'm betting that cooler heads have come to the conclusion that the three judge panel of the 9th and the Seattle judge, have collectively rendered one of the worst decisions in the history of the court, and that it needs to be reversed as soon as possible.
9th Circuit educated by Union dominated public education, but that is another subject for another time.
And the 9th Circus mocked the citizens, “Let them eat cake.”
Whatever. They just want to “win” again and the 9th is the only place they’ve had success
Sounds like the 9th Circuit Loons got wind of the fact that the GOP is drafting legislation to break up their 9th Circuit gaggle of insane hacks.
If the leftist loons of the court believe they're setting a trap for the President, they're playing a very dangerous game, that has often resulted in priestly black robes swinging from trees, in the past.
There's an old adage that says, 'If you're going to shoot at the King, you'd better not miss.'
Well, they shot and missed. They won't get a second opportunity.
I did not know that the Crypt Keeper was a federal judge....
Carol, is that you?
Trump needs to rescind the order and not tell anyone. make them work on nothing for a couple of months.
The Government has not shown that the Executive Order provides what due process requires, such as notice and a hearing prior to restricting an individual’s ability to travel.The President can work around this rather easily.
Now it's possible that en banc review will result in the same decision but with a worse published opinion, one which would make it harder to issue a supplemental order.
It’s not my area, but in 45 years of practice I cannot remember a court rendering, or even empaneling an en blanc on it’s own motion.
Sends a strong signal the 3 judge panel wants to cover itself, but they are also giving the administration a “do over.”
?
If reheard, State of Washington has a tough level of proof to attain. In order to sustain the TRO, they must establish at least two things:
#1: POTUS does not have the questioned authority.
#2: Persons temporarily denied entry would suffer IRREPARABLE harm, and the temporary nature of the ban seems to negate irrreparability argument.
Old Chinese curse: “May you live in interesting times.”
cite
the press release says they do this type of request about 50 times a year:
En banc calls, including sua sponte en banc calls, are a common occurrence. In an average year in the Ninth Circuit, there are approximately 1,500 requests by parties for rehearing en banc.
Typically, there are approximately fifty requests each year by a judge for a vote on whether to rehear the case en banc. On the average, the Ninth Circuit hears between 15-25 en banc cases a year.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.