Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump Supports Civil Asset Forfeiture Even Without Conviction
The New American ^ | 2/8/17 | Steve Byas

Posted on 02/10/2017 1:33:26 PM PST by Timpanagos1

“We’ll destroy his career,” President Donald Trump said of a Texas legislator who has reportedly introduced legislation to curtail civil asset forfeiture — the practice of taking a person’s property allegedly used in the commission of a crime — unless the individual is convicted of a crime.

Trump made his remarks, which were taken as joke, at a February 7 White House meeting with sheriffs from across the country (shown). But even if the remark was not taken seriously by the sheriffs, who laughed at the “threat,” it is clearly indicative of the president’s position on the issue.

During the meeting with the sheriffs, the issue of civil asset forfeiture (CAF) was discussed at some length. Sheriff Aubrey of Jefferson County, Kentucky, raised the issue: “The other thing is asset forfeiture. People want to say we’re taking money and without due process. That’s not true. We take money from dope dealers.”

Trump then asked, “And you’re not allowed to do it now?”

(Excerpt) Read more at thenewamerican.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: dueprocess
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 last
To: mumblypeg

Well said


41 posted on 02/10/2017 4:07:55 PM PST by DariusBane (Liberty and Risk. Flip sides of the same coin. So how much risk will YOU accept? Vive Deo et Vives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: flamberge

Asset Forfeiture without a criminal conviction is an abomination.


I agree. It should be done away with. Yes, Trump needs a full briefing on it.


42 posted on 02/10/2017 4:57:55 PM PST by marktwain (We wanted to tell our side of the story. We hope by us telling our story...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: lastchance

I agree. If someone is arrested and his car is confiscated and held after acquittal, that person should get his car back because he was found innocent.


43 posted on 02/10/2017 5:40:32 PM PST by Cobra64 (Common sense isn't common any more.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: beelzepug; Timpanagos1
I agree that due process is a primary requirement. But I think drugs or weapons, vehicles, jewelry and even properties can be held as evidence, logged and returned if charges are not proven.

It just seems to me that ill gotten gains should not be passed on as and estate. Maybe I'm wrong.

44 posted on 02/10/2017 5:55:36 PM PST by Baynative ( Someone's going to have to pay for these carbon emissions, so it might as well be you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Timpanagos1
Seize SORO'S assets, Clinton's too, set a real precedence against anti American activities.
(Idealistic rant over).

Set a trigger.

45 posted on 02/10/2017 6:04:25 PM PST by right way right (May we remain sober over mere men, for God really is our one and only true hope.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Baynative

You misunderstood what I meant. Seizure of these things to be used in evidence is fine and necessary. What I was talking about was the seizure of cars, cash, and other property, after which no charges are filed and the “suspect” still has to fight to get his belongings returned. I recall very well a case in my town thirty-some years ago where the police chief drove a new Thunderbird that had belonged to an alleged drug dealer who, after having surrendered said car to the cops, had all charges dropped and left town.


46 posted on 02/10/2017 11:49:44 PM PST by beelzepug (Anybody I attack may rest assured it's personal!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: beelzepug
That sounds like Mexico.

That's the point where I want to see the law come down on LEOs who abuse their power.

47 posted on 02/11/2017 9:16:23 AM PST by Baynative ( Someone's going to have to pay for these carbon emissions, so it might as well be you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Timpanagos1

I expect President Trump to disappoint us on a few issues. Him being a populist, though, I’m surprised it is this one.


48 posted on 02/11/2017 9:19:57 AM PST by Lazamataz ("Love Trumping Hate" sure involves a lot more assault and arson than I expected.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson