Skip to comments.BREAKING: 9th Circuit to Issue Ruling on Trump Temporary Travel Ban at 6:30 ET
Posted on 02/09/2017 2:17:04 PM PST by sheikdetailfeather
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals announced they will issue a ruling on President Trumps temporary travel ban.
Washington Judge James L. Robart filed a temporary restraining order on President Trumps refugee ban from seven terror states.
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
Yes. Trump can do that.
The answer better be: Yep, President Trump has the authority. Robart, shut up.
This is going to be the shot across the bow.... Pure politics, nonsense.... meant to stir the pot.
Agreed. Should the admin have waited until Sessions was confirmed?
Signs in the past couple of days seem in a general way to point to a ruling against politics and on the side of law and order. But the number of posters here thinking otherwise probably means they will go political.
I think so.
The 9th Circus gets overturned by the Supremes all the time. They are the most overturned court in the country.
Strategically late in the day. I’m sure they have their reasons. Maybe by then, most the judges will have been safely chauffeured home to their locked condos.
That 2 to 1 against was my take yesterday, allowing for a 3 to 0 against, or 2 to 1 for variance. No way we get 3/0 for us.
Ya know, you bring up an interesting concept...
What if the entire idea was to get rejected on narrow and reasonable, so he could just simply say everyone stay the F out?
It’s the next step that matters, not this one. If the 9th refuses him, they’ve walked right into his trap?
No, because if they send this back to Robart, he’ll do a preliminary injunction and Sessions will be in charge, thus resetting everything.
Wow! If this isn’t political or what?! announcing a timeframe? How convenient when everybody’s home from work! Or am I wrong? I don’t remember the circus footing out a timeframe before...they usually just come out with a ruling and blurred out morning, lunchtime or whenever the hell they feel like it and that’s it!
Robart didn’t even have a case. He brought it all himself. What the hell is up with that ?
If it sides with the President, will the left head to SCOTUS?.............
This is a joke... It’s like President declaring war and the country waiting for judges to determine if it can start. Corrupt
Can anyone here demonstrate via the US CONSTITUTIOPN where an inferior Court CREATED by CONgress has ANY AUTHORITY WHATSOEVER WHEN A PARTY IS A STATE???
Article 3 Section 2 US Constitution
In all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, and those in which a State shall be Party, the supreme Court shall have original Jurisdiction. In all the other Cases before mentioned, the supreme Court shall have appellate Jurisdiction, both as to Law and Fact, with such Exceptions, and under such Regulations as the Congress shall make.
ARREST AND JAIL THE WHOLE BUNCH
Who verifies the claim that someone makes that they are a “refugee?”
They may, surprisingly but correctly, strike down Judge Robart’s baseless temporary restraining order. If they do, it would likely be due solely to their fear that growing resentment of their unconstitutional, anti-American decisions will have attained “critical mass” with sufficient support to allow the dismemberment of the 9th Circuit Court.
There is a 0.00% chance that Obama-appointed crazy bitch Friedland upholds Trump’s EO. Rush was saying today she won some ACLU LGBT award.
The Carter-appointed guy at least seemed somewhat reasonable, but odds are he’ll vote with her too because a libs a lib.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.