Skip to comments.
Radiation at Japan's Fukushima Reactor Is Now at 'Unimaginable' Levels
Fox News Insider ^
| 02/08/17
Posted on 02/08/2017 5:03:45 PM PST by Enlightened1
The radiation levels at Japan's crippled Fukushima nuclear power plant are now at "unimaginable" levels. Adam Housley, who reported from the area in 2011 following the catastrophic triple-meltdown, said this morning that new fuel leaks have been discovered. He said the radiation levels - as high as 530 sieverts per hour - are now the highest they've been since 2011 when a tsunami hit the coastal reactor. "To put this in very simple terms. Four sieverts can kill a handful of people," he explained. He said that critics, including the U.S. military in 2011, have long questioned whether Tokyo Electric Power Co. (TEPCO) and officials have been providing accurate information on the severity of the radiation. TEPCO maintains that the radiation is confined to the site and not a risk to the public. It's expected to take at least $300 billion and four decades to fix it. Housley said small levels of radiation are still being detected off the coasts of California and Oregon and scientists fear it could get worse. "The worry is with 300 tons of radioactive water going into the Pacific every day, what is that doing to the Pacific Ocean?" said Housley. He added that critics are now questioning whether the radiation has been this severe all along.
(Excerpt) Read more at insider.foxnews.com ...
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; Japan; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: a1ufo1kidnapped1me; fukushima; junkscience; levels; preppers; radiation; reactor; tinfoil; unimaginable
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-90 next last
To: ctdonath2
I was thinking that volume of water would find its way out no matter how far out you could effectively poor a barrier.
61
posted on
02/08/2017 7:35:55 PM PST
by
enduserindy
(I always smile when my competition doubles down on stupid.)
To: gundog
Our best indications point to the rest of their lives.
62
posted on
02/08/2017 7:38:20 PM PST
by
enduserindy
(I always smile when my competition doubles down on stupid.)
To: DJ Taylor
Thanks.
Are there any actual medical references, do you know?
63
posted on
02/08/2017 7:41:09 PM PST
by
ifinnegan
(Democrats kill babies and harvest their organs to sell)
To: Rastus
Excellent
64
posted on
02/08/2017 8:05:59 PM PST
by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
To: PastorBooks
I read a few years ago that up to 1/3 of the fish caught in Alaska were showing radiation burns. This is a far bigger problem than what is being reported.The ocean levels aren't intense enough to cause burns. What is happening in the ocean is bio-accumulation. Various nuclear daughter products resemble other elements in the body. Cesium accumulates where potassium goes...concentrates in soft and muscle tissues. Plutonium resembles calcium and accumulates in the bones and teeth. Iodine concentrates in the thyroid. When the accumulated radioactive material decays inside a cell, it can directly damage DNA triggering a cancer process. The sea life are exhibiting tumors. Damage to bone marrow brings on bleeding disorders and leukemia. Thyroid cancer is very common in my area (Pocatello). We had a big spike of I-131 within days after the initial event in Fukushima. I was living in San Diego at the time. We were hit with a metallic taste in the mouth and nose from Sulfur-35 in the air. It was generated by pouring sea water on the nuclear reactor to cool it. The Chlorine was converted to Sulfur-35 and went airborne from the heat.
I can't prove causality, but my elderly mother developed a heart problem 3 weeks after the crap blew over San Diego. She died in Nov 2011. Congestive heart failure and lung cancer. She had lived comfortably at her El Cajon home through March 2011. After multiple hospitalizations, the required assisted living support.
65
posted on
02/09/2017 12:00:48 AM PST
by
Myrddin
To: entropy12
Fukushima blew plutonium laced fuel all over eastern Japan. The reactor cores melted through the containment vessels. A natural mountain stream up the mountain from the plant site is pushing a constant stream of water through the facility. Radiactive material is constantly being washed into the ocean. Levels of radiation just outside the Unit #3 are 20 Sieverts per hour. A 5 minute exposure is lethal to a human. The robots sent in to investigate are failing quickly after entering the building as level are MUCH higher inside. A nuclear weapon is a very clean event compared to a nuclear power plant meltdown.
66
posted on
02/09/2017 12:07:04 AM PST
by
Myrddin
To: marktwain
Your assumptions are based on uniform mixing and dilution. That is not happening. Much of the material is caught in surface currents. It never gets much below 40 ft below the surface. When high winds cause frothy waves, the cesium-137/cesium-134 is lofted into the air and is blown far inland. It has been picked up 300 miles east of the CA coast. Plant life on the west coast is incorporating radioactive material blown in by storms and rained down. I've seen 30,000 CPM of alpha particles on fresh rain water from a person in the western Washington state area. Counts abate as the water soaks into the soil.
I'm waiting for the reports of strontium-90. It's coming.
67
posted on
02/09/2017 12:13:48 AM PST
by
Myrddin
To: usual suspect
BTW, Uss Reagan was in the initial radiation release and had to be retrofitted. All of their water is intake from ocean and desalinized. Entire ship was radioactive. Many servicemen became sick and died
Complete BS....there is still NOT ONE single death attributable to Fukushima....NOT ONE...
68
posted on
02/09/2017 12:14:34 AM PST
by
rottndog
('Live Free Or Die' Ain't just words on a bumber sticker...or a tagline.)
To: ifinnegan
Look up Operation Tamodachi. One of my co-workers was involved in collecting some of that data. The Navy personnel off the coast of Fukushima were hit with a hot fog. It was both hot from a thermal perspective and hot radioactively. The sailors weren't warned. Many were contaminated and developed serious symptoms within days.
69
posted on
02/09/2017 12:16:25 AM PST
by
Myrddin
To: 353FMG
The seawater contains Tritium from the Fukushima site. There is no way to filter it out. It becomes part of you when you consume it.
70
posted on
02/09/2017 12:18:20 AM PST
by
Myrddin
To: rottndog
Baloney. There are many deaths and many damaged. You're playing a disinformation game. A few
here. The Navy doesn't dare admit any culpability as the lawsuits would bankrupt the government. It's easier to play the denial game that you choose to support. The power plant is still spilling crap in the ocean 24x7. There is no fix. It is technologically beyond our capability and financially out of reach for any government.
71
posted on
02/09/2017 12:26:49 AM PST
by
Myrddin
To: Myrddin
Can’t they just drop endless cement on it until it is sealed? Then lead shield it after?
72
posted on
02/09/2017 12:29:29 AM PST
by
A CA Guy
(God Bless America, God Bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
To: Myrddin
I do not see why you would limit your concern to sea water.
Sea water evaporates and becomes rain. The hydrosphere mixes pretty well, with the exception of ground water, which can take a long time to cycle.
But tritium is just an isotope of hydrogen, so, as part of water, it goes through the rain/snow cycle. The tritium in sea water will soon be fairly evenly distributed in all the rain and river water in the world. Fresh water lakes will take a little longer, and it will take much longer to distribute in ground water.
With a half life of 12.32 years, in 50 years it will be only at 1/16 the level it is at today.
73
posted on
02/09/2017 3:57:30 AM PST
by
marktwain
(We wanted to tell our side of the story. We hope by us telling our story...)
To: PastorBooks
“I read a few years ago that up to 1/3 of the fish caught in Alaska were showing radiation burns. “
Factually untrue.
The source of where you read it was posting hysterical nonsense.
As Abraham Lincoln once said; Don’t believe everything you read on the internet.
74
posted on
02/09/2017 4:05:10 AM PST
by
HereInTheHeartland
(I don't want better government; I want much less of it.)
To: Myrddin
The Navy doesn’t dare admit any culpability as the lawsuits would bankrupt the government.
The Navy might want to “cover up” but lawsuits certainly would not bankrupt the government. The government doesn’t even have to allow a lawsuit, and the number of people involved are comparable to the Tuskegee study, where the government was clearly culpable, and did not pay anything.
Come up with a more rational reason for the Navy to “cover-up”, or lose credibility.
75
posted on
02/09/2017 4:09:56 AM PST
by
marktwain
(We wanted to tell our side of the story. We hope by us telling our story...)
To: Myrddin
Your source on Navy deaths and damaged doesn’t hold up.
It is from an advocacy site and a lawyer who will benefit enormously from a lawsuit, so it has plenty of motivation to exaggerate the potential damages and danger.
Certainly, there may be some illness caused by the radioactive isotopes that end up in human bodies. But it will probably be hard to detect those out of the normal level of disease and human mortality.
76
posted on
02/09/2017 4:20:01 AM PST
by
marktwain
(We wanted to tell our side of the story. We hope by us telling our story...)
To: Enlightened1
From MIT for those confused about dosages and nomenclature: Basic conversions: 1 gray (Gy) = 100 rad 1 rad = 10 milligray (mGy) 1 sievert (Sv) = 1,000 millisieverts (mSv) = 1,000,000 microsieverts (μSv) 1 sievert = 100 rem 1 becquerel (Bq) = 1 count per second (cps) 1 curie = 37,000,000,000 becquerel = 37 Gigabecquerels (GBq) For x-rays and gamma rays, 1 rad = 1 rem = 10 mSv For neutrons, 1 rad = 5 to 20 rem (depending on energy level) = 50-200 mSv For alpha radiation (helium-4 nuclei), 1 rad = 20 rem = 200 mSv
77
posted on
02/09/2017 6:54:13 AM PST
by
PIF
(They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
To: Myrddin
You’re dead wrong. Name one person killed by Fukushima radiation. ONE.
78
posted on
02/09/2017 7:17:50 AM PST
by
rottndog
('Live Free Or Die' Ain't just words on a bumber sticker...or a tagline.)
To: marktwain
Perhaps you prefer an MSM source. Here you go
link
79
posted on
02/09/2017 9:20:27 AM PST
by
Myrddin
To: Enlightened1
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-90 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson