Posted on 02/05/2017 7:28:01 AM PST by wastedyears
The Mail on Sunday today reveals astonishing evidence that the organisation that is the world’s leading source of climate data rushed to publish a landmark paper that exaggerated global warming and was timed to influence the historic Paris Agreement on climate change.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
The UN will be very upset if the truth finally comes out about the Global Warming/Climate Change scam. They’ve planned to tax every poor sap in the U.S. to pay for our “sin” of having electricity and treated water in 2017.
Drip, Drip
It’s all about a wealth transfer...
I disagree they were duped. They were all on board with the Agenda and its goals.
This bs and the bs about cholestrol killing us and we all need Statin drugs are world wide con games that take our money and hurt us.
The leaders weren’t duped, the leaders are in on money-making scams and Marxist dreams. Taxpayers were duped.
Good lord,this is mind boggling.
If one just one of the networks ran this it could blow the lid off the whole scam. There is a Pulitzer waiting for someone.
Why didn’t the Mail show the evidence?
Climate Change fraud bump for later...
“The Karl study used flawed data, was rushed to publication in an effort to support the President’s climate change agenda, and ignored NOAA’s own standards for scientific study.’”
The problem is: all of NOAA’s and NASA’s pretty graphs showing global warming were ALL changed by this ONE paper.
As far as I know neither the data nor the graphs published for public consumption, have been corrected.
Right. Feining ignorance when caught is a hallmark of criminals. No sympathy for anyone pushing this evil control scheme.
Why is this story being “broke” in the UK? No US papers interested?
I’m so shocked!
BS about cholesterol? What?
It is not enough for President Trump to oppose the global warming establishment. It is good for him to take action opposing them, but it is not nearly enough.
It is necessary for President Trump to incontrovertibly show that the science behind AGW theory is completely faulty and manufactured and fraudulent. He needs to fund impartial scientists who are skeptical of the IPCC results to PEER review all the IPCC work and then demonstrate all the flaws, intended or not, in those works.
He needs impartial scientists to completely debunk AGW theory and then communicate that in the simplest of terms so that every grade school child knows his teacher is lying if they continue to treat AGW theory as “settled science”.
It is not enough to just lift regulations and bring back coal. Somehow, the brainless masses that believe in this hoax need to be simply but factually shown without doubt that AGW theory is completely false.
It's the same reason a huge pedophile arrest in Europe was quickly pulled out of US news.
It's the same reason that Hillary's emails are the Russian election interference and not Hillary's criminal State Dept pay for play scam and illegal mail server.
It's the same reason the polls were rigged for Hillary.
It's the same reason the press gave Hussein a pass but attack anything Trump.
This is the evidence:
“The sea dataset used by Thomas Karl and his colleagues – known as Extended Reconstructed Sea Surface Temperatures version 4, or ERSSTv4, tripled the warming trend over the sea during the years 2000 to 2014 from just 0.036C per decade – as stated in version 3 – to 0.099C per decade. Individual measurements in some parts of the globe had increased by about 0.1C and this resulted in the dramatic increase of the overall global trend published by the Pausebuster paper. But Dr Bates said this increase in temperatures was achieved by dubious means. Its key error was an upwards ‘adjustment’ of readings from fixed and floating buoys, which are generally reliable, to bring them into line with readings from a much more doubtful source – water taken in by ships. “
Prior to 2003 ocean temps were taken from buckets hauled up into ships or ship intake ports. Not very accurate and Almost exclusively from shipping lanes, not really measuring globally.
After 2003, the (billion dollar?) ARGOS buoy system went online. A global set of buoys that float around all the oceans, dive to a certain depth, surface, then transmit temperature data to satellites. High tech, global and accurate.
The Karl paper in question threw out the more accurate (and cooler) buoy data and matched it to the less accurate (warmer) ship intake data.
My argument to climate scientists:
If this (very expensive) global buoy system is so off, then let’s scrap it and save the taxpayer the millions of dollars/year this apparently inaccurate system (Karl 2015) is costing.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.