Posted on 02/02/2017 5:52:14 AM PST by TangoLimaSierra
Maybe I missed it but I didn’t see where the Clinton’s were even mentioned. Telling Chavitz to do his job was simply assuring him had congress’ back and won’t interfere AND everyone is fair game.
RE: Fake News
As you and maybe a couple others on this thread have pointed out, this article takes something that is demonstrably true (what Chaffetz said about his conversation with President Trump) and conflates other ideas that are not there. That’s the “fake” part.
What is not fake is the actual statement from Chaffetz.
After listening to the youtube video of Chaffetz’ remarks I took it that what Trump was saying is that he will not try to interfere with government (read executive branch) oversight. The way Chaffetz characterizes the conversation, it was purposeful (Trump specifically asked to talk with him at the retreat) and open about the different roles of the respective branches. The way I read it, Trump was being clear that congress can and must watch closely what he and his administration are doing.
It is an extraordinary thing. It is as though Trump says that he will hold his people responsible for the execution of their duties, and congress needs to hold his administration responsible as well.
The American people deserve such transparency.
TS/SCI on unclassified networks is anything but “nothing”.
The thousands of confidential emails are nothing, but the ~20 SCI emails are sufficient to warrant jail time.
The President can request a Congressional investigation but he can't 'order' Gowdy and Chaffetz to do anything. This is the kind of stupid click bait headline that pops up on facebook every time I look.
Did you not see the source? And a simple web search shows this on many sites.
Yes; Chaffetz did strongly oppose Trump on something a few days ago but I can’t recall what it was now.
And Gowdy... big hat, no cattle. Has he accomplished one thing as a result of his hearings and bloviating? He and Issa...
Maybe Sessions can prod them to be effective.
What, are we cheering for an Obama-like despot who can dictate what he wants to anyone? Trump can’t order Gowdy or Chaffetz to do anything. Actually it’s Gowdy, Chaffetz, and Congress that orders Trump as Chief Executive Officer to enforce the laws THEY pass.
Can we stop with the cheering for unilateral executive action along the lines of the Obama’s dictatorship and work to get back to our Free Constitutional Republic with the constitutional separation and balance of powers that is inefficient in favor of the American People and freedom?
“She was never indicted or convicted of anything. ... Therefore, she does not need a pardon.”
It’s been discussed a lot here over the past several months. Indictment and/or conviction aren’t necessary. Nixon had neither and Ford pardoned him.
I’m surprised Obama did not pardon Hillary and himself. You can do that Nixon was never charged and he was pardon(look it up Nixon was never charged with any crime ever). So yes it can be done. I was so sure he would pardon her and himself. They need to pay for what was done to USA & its Citizens.
“Ordered” seems to be the journalist’s word.
We don’t really know how he asked, I presume it was a kind discussion between two non-Clinton-like people.
Perhaps he was giving permission to investigate his own branch? We don’t know. Didn’t we do that in the 1970’s?
It is leverage to get nominations.
“Saul Alinsky overload”
very good point
Jeff Daniels and Jim Carrey, “Dumb and Dumber Do Manhattan”
[Trey Gowdy and Jason Chaffetz reside on this board, and are well-known for their vicious work during the Clinton case]
To what end other than hearing the outlaws using more Fifths than drunks on a Saturday night leaving the vicious workers impotent to do a thing about it.
Recently, 300 emails were dumped during a superbowl game. These showed that she sent classified info to Blumenthal. His system was hacked by the Russians, Chinese, and Israelis.
According to Judge Napolitano, this negates the reasoning that Comey used to fail to indict. He also discussed why an Obama pardon wouldn’t do that much for Clinton - I think it had to do with Obama could pardon her for Federal, but that there were state laws and investigations as well as violations of international laws relating to the Foundations.
Those are Congressmen, not Executive Branch employees. Shouldn’t Trump be asking them to do something, not instructing them to do something?
Interesting the Weiner story just hit too...
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3520451/posts
Maybe they can get her to flip and get names of everybody involved in every scheme and arrest all 1000, 2000 or whatever number for bribery, murder, treason, spying and whatever in return for a slap on the wrist, a pardon for Billy if he talks, too, and a pardon for her daughter thrown in just in case. The daughter is the key if her hands are also dirty, as H. and Bill my not live till 2020.
It’s going to be interesting to see what comes of this. Maybe justice will finally come to the Clintons.
Two things are certain though. This will be labeled a “Republican witch hunt” and Trump will be called a dictator “using his power to go after his political enemies”.
This is a questionable emphasis on Clinton in this article and what the President said..
Putting this on the I doubt it list
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.