Posted on 01/31/2017 9:17:26 PM PST by Tours
Washington President Donald Trump nominated Neil Gorsuch to the Supreme Court on Tuesday night, fulfilling his campaign promise to nominate a documented judicial conservative to the nation's justiceship.
Gorsuch currently serves as a judge on the US Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. If confirmed by the Senate, he will take the seat of the late Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, considered a lion of the law and a hero of the political Right.
Scalia died over a year ago, leaving a vacancy on the nine-judge court. But Republican Senate leadership refused to entertain then-president Barack Obama's choice for the seat, Merrick Garland, casting the vacancy as a choice the American people to make through the selection of their next president.
Garland, had he been confirmed, would have brought to four the number of Jewish justices on the court.
Trump campaigned on a promise to select his nominee for Scalia's seat from a published list of known conservatives. Gorsuch, 49, was on that list.
Gorsuch characterizes his judicial philosophy in similar terms as Scalia: He considers himself a textualist on statutes, and believes the US Constitution should be enforced as it was originally interpreted. He has weighed in in favor of "religious freedom" laws that have allowed for exceptions to and restrictions on reproductive rights, although he has not personally issued any rulings on abortion from the bench.
Born in Colorado, Gorsuch attended Columbia University, Harvard Law School, and Oxford University for his doctorate. He clerked for both Supreme Court Justices Byron White and Anthony Kennedy before a short stint in private practice.
Judgeships on the Supreme Court are lifetime appointments.
Shortly after Trump announced his nominee came criticism and concern from several Reform Jewish organizations.
We are greatly troubled by Judge Gorsuchs record, which suggests that he may not have the attributes and values a nominee to the Supreme Court ought to have in order to mete out justice and interpret the laws that affect us all, a statement issued by Rabbi Jonah Dov Pesner on behalf of a number of the Reform movements umbrella bodies read. We look forward to engaging in the confirmation process to further evaluate Judge Gorsuchs views on issues of core importance to the Reform Movement, including civil rights, separation of church and state, religious freedom, womens rights, LGBTQ equality, and many more.
Rabbi Pesner added that either way, it is also absolutely crucial that whomever joins the highest court in the land is a person who will defend the Constitution, promote equal rights and opportunity for all and approach legal interpretation with the reverence and care it deserves.
Unless President Trump's nominee meets all of these criteria and clarifies his views in confirmation hearings, we have significant reservations about his confirmation to be a Supreme Court Justice, he added. Bend the Arc, a liberal social action group, also said it was deeply concerned by Gorsuchs record.
Among Gorsuchs opinions, most attracting Jewish interest was Burwell vs. Hobby Lobby in 2013, when the appeals court upheld the right of a private business to reject the government mandate to provide contraceptive care under employee health plans.
The Obama administration had offered leeway on such coverage to faith-based non-profits, but would not extend them to private businesses. Gorsuch joined the majority in the Appeals Court ruling, which was upheld the next year by the Supreme Court. Liberal Jewish groups backed the government in the case, while Orthodox Jewish groups favored Hobby Lobby. Gorsuch has also favored displays of crosses on public lands, and has tended in his rulings toward the rights of gun owners, in favor of the death penalty and against abortion rights.
The Interfaith Alliance, which describes itself "the faith-based voice countering the radical right and promoting the positive role of religion, also voiced opposition to the nomination, saying that Gorsuch supported religious discrimination as federal judge.
"Religious freedom is not a license to discriminate, the statement read. Unfortunately, President Trump's Supreme Court nominee Judge Neil Gorsuch seems to believe otherwise.
The alliance added that "as a federal judge he ruled on two of the most consequential religious freedom cases in recent years, and both times he opposed genuine religious freedom. Instead, he empowered groups seeking to force their religious beliefs onto others.
"Senators must carefully examine Judge Gorsuch's views and record to determine whether he would uphold religious freedom for all Americans, regardless of faith. We cannot afford as a nation to put our First Freedom at risk, the group concluded.
Nathan Diament, the Orthodox Unions executive director of public policy, meantime, said Gorsuchs rulings show a jurisprudential approach that venerates religious conscience and pluralism in American society.
Trumps supreme court nomination is likely to face a fight, with Democrats suggesting they may filibuster his nomination. Democrats are still stung by the refusal of Senate Majority Leader Sen. Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., to allow a hearing for President Barack Obamas nominee to replace Scalia, Merrick Garland, a moderate judge. Garland, had he been confirmed, would have brought to four the number of Jewish justices on the court. On the other side of the Jewish movements spectrum, however, the Orthodox Union, said Gorsuchs rulings show a jurisprudential approach that venerates religious conscience and pluralism in American society.
Danielle Ziri and JTA contributed to this report.
No offense, but that comment is idiotic. There are three Jewish justices on the U.S. Supreme Court right now, and they are among the most reliably leftist/communist justices the court has ever had.
Yeah, we know: To the leftists, everything comes down to racism, faggotry and abortion. Pound sand, you schmuck! Elections have consequences.
The amazing ability of an ethnic group to demand everything be about them.
Unwritten? No ... it's right there in the 30th Amendment ... haven't you seen it? Try to keep up ...
No, Hitler’s mother was not a Jew.
and has tended in his rulings ... against abortion rights.
Which is it?
The Reform (and increasingly the Conservative Movement) are removing themselves from being part of the Jewish community. A large percentage of Jews have done the same in the past. Sadducees and related groups did the same, followed by Jewish Christians, the Karaites, followers of Shabbatai Tzvi, and followers of Jacob Frank. All represented a significant percentage of the Jews, but eventually disappeared from the Jewish community.
“Religious freedom is not a license to discriminate, the statement read. Unfortunately, President Trump’s Supreme Court nominee Judge Neil Gorsuch seems to believe otherwise.
An absolute crock of nonsense. If you cannot discriminate, there is no freedom of association. Without freedom of association, organized religion becomes nearly impossible.
There should be no discrimination by the government, unless on merit; but private parties should be able to discriminate at will.
GOOD catch
DOD 2/13/16
Except the case eventually went to the USSC and THAT court upheld the lower court (Gorsuch) with a 5-4 ruling.
So any leaning to call him anti-women is a red herring.
Thanks, no pardons for taking these lies on. Now Hitler’s a Jew! I like FR for its support of Israel and its genuine lack of anti-Semitism but these ignorant posts take the cake!
Historians have looked at the evidence and concluded that that's probably not what happened, although Hitler may have believed it.
Hitler adored his mother, BTW, and loathed his father.
I though it said “jewelry” at first glance. Never Mind.
Cause mine is all sewn into the hem of my garment. /s
A local Rabbi I know, familiar with Gorsuch’s judicial record is pleased Gorsuch is nominated. Why do Leftist Jews claim to speak for Jews when all they are speaking for is their own political, not religious, bias.
Fascinating coincidence of a brand new article about this. -— There is a visible shift towards conservatism among American Jews. This author is a bit on the optimistic side, imho, in that the “progressives” aren’t out of business yet, not by a long shot. But still there’s a visible movement back to more traditionally Jewish/ Biblical values in many — linkee :
http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2017/02/american_jews_are_becoming_conservative.html
.
You are often amusing.
Nobody here takes you seriously, but few will challenge you because you are a “Tar Baby.”
I have no malice toward you.
.
I like you too. :-)
It was a patently ridiculous, stupid, on purpose LIE, to ramp up a flame war, by a very well known troll here, who craves attention from me and others here, so that he can then claim that he is in some way superior to those whom he detests. Just take it from whence it came and move on.
OTOH, I am being lauded, thanked, and "liked".
You couldn't "take me on" and win, if armed with an earpiece and THE most intelligent people, all over the world, were telling you what to post. You harass and poke at me O( and others here ), for attention, ego, and dislike. But in doing that, all you succeed in doing, is annoying others ( no, not me, I just laugh AT you and your puerile antics )and turning yourself into an object of derision and someone to laugh at to boot.
Oh....and you're misusing the term "TAR BABY". Yet another miscalculation on your part. LOL
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.