Posted on 01/15/2017 3:32:38 PM PST by Eleutheria5
Trump is a fascist. He's picking on everybody. Waaaah!
(Excerpt) Read more at youtube.com ...
I saw him on O’Really the other night. He looked like he was ready for a straightjacket.
I think one of the Wayans brothers did a parody of him many years ago.
He’s the guy who keeps a bowl of chicken soup in his beard and wrings it out when he’s hungry.
Yeah, what’s that guys name? They both look like homeless stooges. Both look unhinged
The left tries hard to draw a left/right contrast between Marxism and fascism but there’s really not that much difference between them. Marxism and fascism are both totalitarian forms of government where the individual is subservient to the state and has only those rights the state happens to allow on any given day. The state literally holds the power of life and death over the people and eventually descends into mass murder, chaos, revolution, war.
Marxism/fascism are extremely authoritarian (totalitarian) forms of government, usually godless, lawless, statist dictatorships that place the interests of the state over the individual and tries to control every aspect of human society and economic/political activity.
Examples of Marxist/fascist totalitarians include: Lenin, Stalin, Hitler, Mao, Ho Chi Minh, Pol Pot, Castro, Obama (wanted to be a Marxist/fascist dictator, but blocked by we the people).
Our republican form of government with its God-given individual freedoms and liberty for all guaranteed by the US Constitution and with its governmental powers limited by the constitution and supported by conservatives is exactly opposite to the Marxist/fascist totalitarian forms of government supported by godless democrats, progressives, liberals, statists, socialists, Marxists, fascists, and communists, ie, leftist revolutionaries.
The real distinction is between statist Marxism/fascism vs god-given freedom and liberty.
Freedom is a Judeo-Christian principle and is hated by Marxists and fascists.
America’s founding and our republican form of government and constitution was inspired by and based on Judeo-Christian principles and is hated by godless Marxist/fascists (democrats) who constantly try to subvert it and make it fail.
Trump supports our constitutional government and freedoms and Judeo-Christian way of life and therefore is no fascist.
Incoherent
Riverdawg on Cornel West: this is what affirmative action looks like.
Nailed it.
These guys are not very smart - if they kept their mouths shut no one would know how stupid they are.
Cornel West is the guy who tried to pass off a rap video as a scholarly endeavor. LOL
Me on Cornel West: This is what a Neanderthal in a suit looks like...........
Ever noticed how the Communists never referred to the Nazis as “Nazis”, but as “Fascists”.
Because Nazi stood for “National Socialist”, so by calling them “Nazis”, they would have been admitting that they were Socialists.
The left tries hard to draw a left/right contrast between Marxism and fascism but there’s really not that much difference between them.
The godless democrats (maybe not each and every one of them, entirely godless? it can be difficult to tell), the progressives...statists and socialists, and the rest you listed, all of them hi-jack and divert whatever can be taken from this nation's Christian heritage, which in America has been one much more of tolerance of those who choose to disagree, than some kind of theocracy that the left keeps saying will happen if conservative Christians are allowed to speak openly. It is themselves, those on the list you just wrote out, who cannot "tolerate" differences of opinion.
Ok, sorry, preaching to the choir here (or maybe a choir member preaching to a local resident, advanced level theologian, take your pick).
Holy Cow- I thought that tenure at Princeton required at least one opposable thumb.
West is a communist. He even acknowledges that.
Kissing cousins. One National, the other intending to be International.
Slightly different promises from either as to how they'd go about things, but interestingly enough, the latter, the one who promised ultimate freedom to the proletariat, (the so-vi-et') the one who promised would do away with all top-down government entirely, did become to large extent, totalitarian further than did the Nationalists. Then again, the Nationalist were defeated militarily and so did not survive long enough for further evaluation/comparison.
Within the US Constitutional there is a model of the principle of the people having --no king-- no ultimate "ruler", but instead, the people themselves collectively sovereign.
Who need's "soviet" style communism? Must ownership of private property be done away with in order for all to pull together in political sense? Do away with private property "rights" and then see just how fast all the rest (including God-given 'human' rights) go bye-bye.
It happens every time. Why? Because all men are evil. There is none good except the Father, The Creator of the universe.
'Course you know all this stuff I assume, so again on this page, apologies offered for preaching to choir and preachers and others already in-the-know.
Forgive the delay in replying, had to go outside and stand watch just in case I had to shoo a tornado away, over towards the East. Sorry, Grand Prairie, I got me peoples here in this house, other than just me. You guys, over there (whoever you are) you're own your own. Sorry, can't help you...
East Dallas, North of I-30 and then in a line towards due North of downtown Dallas might start thinking about where in their house they'd prefer to be if they hear a freight train sound bearing down on 'em, from some new direction where there ain't no train tracks.
No, I didn't hear any roaring where I'm at. Not even high winds. Some downpour, but I've seen lot's thicker, you know, like it was somebody up in the air was pouring out an Olympic sized swimming pool10?
To own or control (shepherd) property is also a Judeo-Christian concept. Thou shalt not steal; thou shalt not covet thy neighbor’s property, etc.
Ask the Jews or any of the countries or people whose land or property was invaded/stolen by the nazis whether or not they had rights to private property under fascism. But the fascist judges made it “legal” (the taking of life and property). Again, no real difference between fascism and marxism. Both are godless totalitarian systems where the individual has no God-given inalienable rights and no say in the matter. If the state wants your property or your life, it’s gone.
I think the main thing that makes the American republic great and sets our form of government apart from all others is that it was founded on Judeo-Christian principles and on the belief that our inalienable rights (including the right to private property) are granted by God.
Obama and other democrats can state the founding principles, but if they don’t live by or govern by them, they don’t believe it.
Abortion is not a right granted by God. Nor is same-sex marriage. Nor is it right by God that judges make it “legal.”
No, Cornel, what you and your ilk are doing is leaning towards fascism.
Absolutely. Lacking acknowledgement that rights are "bestowed" by a Creator (Nature's God, as written in this nation's Declaration of Independence) gives an opening for those who would prefer themselves, rather than [ahem] Nature's God to be provider of the description of just what are 'rights' (thus by definition, should be inalienable, not allowed to be contravened) and what are not.
To for moment change the subject matter somewhat, from what you were discussing there at the end of what you wrote, if I may I would like to mention an additional contemporary issue;
When it comes to immigration to this nation from other nations and place, that we do indeed champion human rights does not equal that all human beings have any inalienable right to be accepted as co-equal citizen by this nation's inhabitants -- or even allowed entry into this nation, at all.
Build the wall, whatever it takes to stop (or at least drastically reduce) the near-unfettered influx of undocumented persons -- and then we could revamp immigration policies in ways that allowed those who strongly desired to become a part of this nation, joining in with it's foundational Judeo-Christian derived ethos without nullifying the inalienable rights of this nation's present citizens, which citizenship 'rights' do include right to freedom of association.
Part of that 'right' as I understand that to be, does include freedom from being forced into associations one would rather not be.
As you said;
Abortion is not a right granted by God. Nor is same-sex marriage. Nor is it right by God that judges make it “legal.
I cannot but agree (lest being going not merely against you, and others mere opinions) but would be going against what should be plainly enough recognized as natural law.
Have you ever noticed how those whom it does appear would entirely do away with any mention of a Judaeo-Christian "God" if they could, while they are otherwise also presently busy with attempts to construct some form of new religion based upon 'Nature', and we (life itself, even!) according to these religion makers, be just some form of gigantic but possibly still earth-based cosmic accident, in area of considerations regarding sexual reproduction -- are the foremost warrior champions against Nature, itself?
It is one thing to recognize that mankind is woefully, shall we say - sinful.
It is another, to while still trying to hold on to concepts inclusive of (even based upon) the idea that life itself holds a sacredness, possibly still mystery itself (that we've yet to fully grok & map out too) which should be sacred among ourselves (human beings) and at the same time deny that same sacredness whenever it is convenient to their own lusts. That is where wars come from too, of course, according to New Testament scripture, even if not all wars are begun by say -- homosexuals, and others who for sake of convenience want to be free to murder living human forms, when those life forms have not yet become fully born.
The only natural-law incident similar to that which I can think of, is --at times, among honeybees -- when the worker bees detect inviolability of brood, when those brood are still in the cells, the inviolability having come about by too close a "cross" of genetic material through queen/drone mating, the workers bees are known to remove the brood from whichever cell(s) the bees sense the problem with, prior to that same brood-cell's contents maturing, and eventually emerging as a grown "bee". Mating with drones carrying same sex allele as the (a) queen bee carries is one cause of what's called "shotgun brood" pattern, although a queen may fail to lay in good & close cell-by-cell pattern too, resulting in similar appearing comb just for having not laid egg in every cell. Worker bees are known to guide the queen along, nudging and steering her here and there, even at the same time her attendants often surround her, their faces all pointed towards her in interest, if not actual adoration.
Among humans (many social groups worldwide) there are cultural taboos against marrying one's own mother or father, sister or brother, etc. Natural law, at work? Or was possibly recognized among humans as existing? You know, like it being in realm of, or at least towards realm of what could be looked upon as 'objective truth' which exists whether or not anyone sees it as truth, accepting the same as truth. It will always, eventually have it's way.
I mean, if we're going to be having Nature itself be our God, then how could they ever think that going against that God could be among proper dutifully called-for respectful obedience?
Nils Landgren - Nature Boy (live, 2002) it takes about 2minutes to start gettin' with it -- worth the wait for fans of 'clean' jazz
The difference between Communism and Fascism is that fascism co-opts the means of production ( industry) while Marxism puts the means of production into the hands of the working class, Both use totalitarian power and easily commit genocide.
Communist government ignores public ridicule while fascism is destroyed by it. This was a truth understood by Winston Churchill. Ridicule drives Obama quite insane. It is a means of destroying the Obama movement.That’s why its important to understand the difference between Marxism and Fascism. They require different weapons to defeat each of them.( Communism is defeat-able by black market private profit. Fascism is defeated by public ridicule and truth, which is exactly what Donald Trump is doing via Twitter.We need to support him in that.)
Obama was no Communist or Marxist. You can see the difference outlined in this signal article by Kyle Ann Shiver:( Well worth the read.)
Barrack Obama, the Quintessential Liberal Fascist:
http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/05/barack_obama_the_quintessentia_1.html
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.