Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Are Ad-Blockers Saving Internet Users, or Ruining the Internet?
Motherboard ^ | 1/13/2017 | Meredith Rutland Bauer

Posted on 01/13/2017 1:49:00 PM PST by qam1

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-82 next last

1 posted on 01/13/2017 1:49:00 PM PST by qam1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: qam1

We use Ad Blocker Plus to protect our computer from hostile advertising sites/services that often push malware in their ads.

The way to deal with this is to place the ads as content in a site instead of using these annoying weblinks that stream crap to your computer and hog up all your bandwidth.


2 posted on 01/13/2017 1:52:38 PM PST by MeganC (Hate crime: The heinous act of disagreeing with a liberal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: qam1
the EU’s European Commission even proposed a rule this week that would allow media companies to ban users who use ad-blockers

I've already run into this. You know what I do, I don't visit those websites. Screw 'em. If they're gonna be that way, I don't need them.

3 posted on 01/13/2017 1:53:51 PM PST by ducttape45 (Every Saint has a past, Every Sinner has a Future!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeganC

When linking to some news sites from Drudge or here I get a popup that won’t let me continue unless I whitelist their site. I do just the opposite and blacklist them as not worth the effort.


4 posted on 01/13/2017 1:54:27 PM PST by Oshkalaboomboom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: qam1

Ad blockers allow me to visit websites that are otherwise unusable. Some newspaper sites take 10 minutes to load a page without an ad blocker but take a few seconds with the ads suppressed.


5 posted on 01/13/2017 1:56:21 PM PST by Senator_Blutarski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: qam1
It is not my concern over whether someone makes money. If they have content available for free, i'll peruse it if I wish, but I do not want to be bombarded with adds, and I do not care if your business depends upon them.

It's my choice what I want to watch, not theirs.

6 posted on 01/13/2017 1:59:52 PM PST by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: qam1

The reason ad-blocker is necessary is because have you ever tried to access some of these websites on your cellphone and find it completely overtaken by ads? Enough said.


7 posted on 01/13/2017 2:00:04 PM PST by GrandJediMasterYoda (Hillary Clinton IS a felon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: qam1

It allows me to not have to see an ad for every damn 1 minute video on YouTube.


8 posted on 01/13/2017 2:00:46 PM PST by VanDeKoik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: qam1

This is a simple problem to solve.

Charge for access to your site. If people are not willing to pay for it, it’s not market-viable anyway. And should return to dust.


9 posted on 01/13/2017 2:02:28 PM PST by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: qam1

I have found a new browser called “Brave”. It annihilates ads and pop up. . It claims to have stopped over 100,000 ads since I installed it two months ago. This pleases me so much. It is a 95 mb program ( huge) and it is slightly slower but the damned thing works.
Also never watch any ads on FOX NEWS. We tape every show we like and watch 30 minutes later and zip through ads. We live in such a great age!! I didn’t watch a single ad on college football or any halftime. I watch an entire recorded game in under 1 hour. I hate Ads.


10 posted on 01/13/2017 2:02:44 PM PST by WENDLE (Meet force with more force in DC !! Take nothing off these thugs!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: qam1

The ad people are like the Progressive elites, they think they know best and you have to put up with their crap.

When I go to a news page I don’t want to load a crap movie trailer for a movie I will never watch with no escape. If I were interested, I would click on it.


11 posted on 01/13/2017 2:03:43 PM PST by RetiredTexasVet (Dan Rather, a 60 Minutes Investigative Reporter for CBS, invented "Fake News"-fake but accurate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: qam1

If web companies didn’t put in so many ads, and if the ad makers didn’t so frequently use crappy code, we wouldn’t use ad blockers. It’s just like telemarketing, when it was a minor irritant we accepted it, but once telemarketers started hitting everybody multiple times a day we started finding ways to block them. I had a lot of fun over election season blocking any number whose ID was just some city.


12 posted on 01/13/2017 2:03:47 PM PST by discostu (Alright you primative screwheads, listen up!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oshkalaboomboom

Yup. Any sites that don’t like our ad blocker I just don’t go to.


13 posted on 01/13/2017 2:03:47 PM PST by MeganC (Hate crime: The heinous act of disagreeing with a liberal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: qam1

Maybe they should make better ads .... I never pass up a Budweiser dog and horse ad.


14 posted on 01/13/2017 2:04:46 PM PST by RetiredTexasVet (Dan Rather, a 60 Minutes Investigative Reporter for CBS, invented "Fake News"-fake but accurate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: qam1

I also use and recommend Ad Block plus. I pay for Internet, and I go out of my way to blacklist any company whose ads occasionally sneak through. F ‘em!


15 posted on 01/13/2017 2:06:26 PM PST by W. (A funny thing happened on the way to the forum...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: qam1

Abusive ads are why there are ad blockers.


16 posted on 01/13/2017 2:06:33 PM PST by Ray76 (DRAIN THE SWAMP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: qam1

If ad blockers become universal in use then there will have to be fees to use the internet, either metered usage or fees per email and fees per page view. Something has to pay for it all. And yes, I do use an ad-blocker or the internet must be reduced to commercial sites i.e. entirely consisting of ads.


17 posted on 01/13/2017 2:08:39 PM PST by arthurus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: qam1

Netflix is a great example of how non-ad offerings to consumers can be successful. Netflix streams movies and TV series for a REASONABLE monthly fee, ad-free.

Netflix is adding members every month, whereas cable/satellite companies are losing members every month. The main reason? People are fed up with too many ads. A couple of years ago, the ‘industry’ added even more ads by shortening regular tv programs by another couple of minutes.

In the 1970s, and hour TV show had approximately 50 minutes of content. By the 1980s those shows had about 46 minutes of content. A few years ago, the content was down to 42 minutes, and now, many programs have been reduced to about 39 minutes.

Many people will pay for ‘good’ content, but they are infuriated by commercial concerns who try to sell both — a subscription fee and a website full of ads. That is why cable/satellite are losing customers — the massive subscription fees AND increasing ad contents.


18 posted on 01/13/2017 2:10:07 PM PST by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: qam1

I don’t want the added delay getting to my destination, the clogging of my computer buffer, having to close tons of windows once they are done, and the malware that creeps in.

Sorry, find a better way of achieving your goals folks.

Pop-up adds will never be welcome.


19 posted on 01/13/2017 2:15:38 PM PST by DoughtyOne (John McStain. The friend of those who hate our nation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy
Netflix streams movies and TV series for a REASONABLE monthly fee, ad-free.

If you don't mind an abundance of faggot movies and otherwise general trash. Plus they've been having more and more raghead type nonsense.

I finally cancelled Netflix. I think they're trying to get away from having to pay royalties to quality entertainment.

20 posted on 01/13/2017 2:16:04 PM PST by LouAvul (The most High ruleth in the kingdom of men, and giveth it to whomsoever he will.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-82 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson