Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Schumer: I Wish Democrats Hadn’t Triggered the ‘Nuclear Option’
Breitbart ^ | January 4, 2017 | by ADELLE NAZARIAN

Posted on 01/04/2017 3:32:49 PM PST by Jim Robinson

Incoming Senate minority leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) says he regrets a 2013 decision by Senate Democrats, known as the “nuclear option” to decrease the number of senators needed to confirm Cabinet picks from 60 to 51 votes.

“I wish it hadn’t happened,” Schumer said in an interview with CNN, about the move that was triggered by former Senate Democratic leader Harry Reid (D-NV).

The move is dubbed the “nuclear option” because by altering the filibuster rules it stands to blow up bipartisan Senate relations.

“I argued against it at the time,” Schumer said. “I said both for Supreme Court and in Cabinet should be 60, because on such important positions there should be some degree of bipartisanship. I won on Supreme Court, lost on Cabinet. But, that’s what we have to live with now.”

Republicans hold a 52-48 majority in the new Senate which means they already have the number needed to confirm Trump’s nominees without the Democrats. However, the Democrats have still vowed to fight against the picks. Schumer and his fellow Democratic senators will aggressively target eight of President-elect Donald Trump’s Cabinet picks, which he refers to as “rigged.”

“If Republicans think they can quickly jam through a whole slate of nominees without a fair hearing process, they’re sorely mistaken,” Schumer said recently...

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 115th; cabinet; democrats; filibuster; nuclearoption; reid; schumer; trump; trumpcabinet; trumptransition
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-104 next last
To: All

#9 should be CARL Levin of Michigan, not Mark Levin!


41 posted on 01/04/2017 4:06:15 PM PST by jjotto ("Ya could look it up!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Let me get this clear:

First the Dummies wanted to abolish the electoral college, even though they have won elections that way. Now they want to do away with the nuclear option because suddenly it doesn’t suit their needs.

So: when it works for THEM, it’s OK. When it works for us, it’s all wrong and must be fixed.

Now I got it.


42 posted on 01/04/2017 4:07:12 PM PST by Old Grumpy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Schumer is as disgusting bottom feeder as Harry Reid was. I pray a prayer based on Psalms in the Book of Psalms, that God, not humans, will make him as an abortion, and that God will not show grace to our enemies.


43 posted on 01/04/2017 4:07:52 PM PST by righttackle44 (Leave the bodies as a warning--take scalps.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cpdiii

Correction it was “Embrace the Suck” and was told to the Republicans and Democrats alike. Click link below for the article.

http://www.politico.com/story/2013/12/nancy-pelosi-budget-deal-101072


44 posted on 01/04/2017 4:08:21 PM PST by cpdiii (Deckhand, Roughneck, Mud Man, Geologist, Pilot, Pharmacist, THE CONSTITUTION IS WORTH DYING FOR.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
...by altering the filibuster rules it stands to blow up bipartisan Senate relations.

There's that slippery, one-way "B" word again.

45 posted on 01/04/2017 4:10:36 PM PST by bkopto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

No backsies, you hypocritical double-dealing jerk.


46 posted on 01/04/2017 4:11:45 PM PST by jiggyboy (Ten percent of poll respondents are either lying or insane)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

If the filibuster rule was changed in order to pass Obamacare, then Obama can claim it as his legacy.

At any rate, here’s to filibuster rules at our disposal. There is a lot of fixing to do in every respect and we need every tool we can get - hopefully Chuck will drop the delusion and pick up the teeny violin.


47 posted on 01/04/2017 4:14:40 PM PST by LurkedLongEnough
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man

48 posted on 01/04/2017 4:14:44 PM PST by Carriage Hill ( Peace is that brief glorious moment in history, when everybody stands around reloading.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

He finally remembers and regrets.


49 posted on 01/04/2017 4:16:46 PM PST by Parmy (II don't know how to past the images.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Elections have consequences!

Now, sit down and STFU! You lost!


50 posted on 01/04/2017 4:17:54 PM PST by unixfox (Abolish Slavery, Repeal the 16th Amendment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Feel the suck schmuck I mean Chuck.


51 posted on 01/04/2017 4:18:38 PM PST by Romans Nine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Actually, the nuclear option is just the return to regular order. The present need for 60 votes to pass anything is not a filibuster but an unconstitutional super majority. With a true filibuster the senator needed to control the floor by continuing talking. All other business stopped. It was difficult to maintain and was thus only rarely used. The present misnamed filibuster, in which other business can continue, has made it too easy, thus now requiring 60 votes on practically everything. It is time to get rid of it.


52 posted on 01/04/2017 4:20:22 PM PST by Petrosius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Live by the sword, die by the sword. Timeless...


53 posted on 01/04/2017 4:21:23 PM PST by Noumenon (Proud Irredeemable Deplorable, heavily armed Infidel. Islam delenda est.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins

All started with giving women the vote.

Next thing you know Senators are picked by popular vote and the IRS is helping themselves to a piece of every business and individuals income, from whatever source.

Not to mention FDR, Kennedy, Carter, Clinton, and Hussein Obama.

Worst thing to happen to the Republic since Lincoln.


54 posted on 01/04/2017 4:21:54 PM PST by Rome2000 (SMASH THE CPUSA-SIC SEMPER TYRANNIS-CLOSE ALL MOSQUES)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Petrosius

Correct on all counts.


55 posted on 01/04/2017 4:24:47 PM PST by Jim Robinson (Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

BULLCRAP!!! You only had a problem with it the day after Hillary lost.


56 posted on 01/04/2017 4:28:37 PM PST by Organic Panic (Rich White Man Evicts Poor Black Family From Public Housing - MSNBCPBSCNNNYTABC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jjotto

It should be noted that Mark Levin pressured Republcians to reverse it in 2014. Good thing no one listens to him.


57 posted on 01/04/2017 4:30:49 PM PST by proust (Trump / Pence 2016!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
If a super majority was intended, our forefathers would specifically have put it in the Constitution.

A President is entitled to choose his own cabinet. Why does it even need Senate approval?

58 posted on 01/04/2017 4:35:54 PM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

People are forgetting about the 10 democrat senators up for reelection in red states in 2018. The Republicans can put quite a bit of pressure on them and make them dance a bit.


59 posted on 01/04/2017 4:40:25 PM PST by Revolutionary ("Praise the Lord and Pass the Ammunition!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Cat’s out of the bag, Schmuckie Chuckie. If the Democrats filibuster Trump’s SCOTUS nominee, the Republicans will likely abolish the filibuster regarding SCOTUS nominees.


60 posted on 01/04/2017 4:43:29 PM PST by Repeal 16-17 (Let me know when the Shooting starts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-104 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson