Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama could use 5 minute window to FORCE SCOTUS PICK Garland!
Gateway Pundit ^ | Jan. 2, 2017 | Ryan Saavedra

Posted on 01/02/2017 1:41:47 PM PST by HarleyLady27

Obama has one last chance to force his pick for the Supreme Court, Merrick Garland, on to the highest court in the land.

Obama will have a 5 minute window known as “intersession recess” when he can force the move.

(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: america; bho44; bhoscotus; constitution; fakenews; false; garbage; government; hoax; merrickgarland; nonsense; propaganda; supremecourt; trumptransition
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-122 next last
To: HarleyLady27

Fake click-bait news.


21 posted on 01/02/2017 1:57:49 PM PST by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: txhurl

He could also install Hillary Clinton in this 5 minute window.


22 posted on 01/02/2017 1:58:55 PM PST by kaehurowing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Cold War Veteran - Submarines

The turtle is seldom seen with head unexposed by shell.

Meanwhile, BO’B found enough smarts to push incessantly for a ban on Israel, all the while smiling to proclaim that this was done by others...the Russians perhaps?

However, at this time - wondering just how long ValJar will be assigned Secret Service to guard her as they do other members of the Pressy Prezzy’s immediate family.

So MANY questions and so few truthful answers.


23 posted on 01/02/2017 1:59:32 PM PST by V K Lee (Is it too early for a President Trump?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: kaehurowing

Or Valerie Jarrett!


24 posted on 01/02/2017 2:01:45 PM PST by txhurl (Break's over, kids, back to WAR.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator

+1.


25 posted on 01/02/2017 2:02:10 PM PST by proust (Trump / Pence 2016!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: HarleyLady27

Only if he wants to start Civil War II


26 posted on 01/02/2017 2:03:35 PM PST by Lurkinanloomin (Natural Born Citizen Means Born Here Of Citizen Parents)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HarleyLady27

Fake news.


27 posted on 01/02/2017 2:03:36 PM PST by Oldeconomybuyer (The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurkinanloomin

Which he does.


28 posted on 01/02/2017 2:04:07 PM PST by txhurl (Break's over, kids, back to WAR.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: HarleyLady27
Merrick Garland and the federal judiciary would be a great loser in such a maneuver. He would be a permanent target of controversy and under a threat of impeachment for even the slightest irregularity.

In addition, conservatives would be stirred up against the Supreme Court and the federal judiciary in ways that would energize reform efforts at the expense of the Left. In effect, conservatives would conclude that the federal courts must be diminished because the Left was willing to bend and break norms and rules to prevent conservatives from exercising the political authority over the federal courts even when the public conferred it on them.

29 posted on 01/02/2017 2:04:20 PM PST by Rockingham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RitaOK

I don’t believe it will happen either, if it was going to happen it would have by now...thought it was just some of what Barky would think about...

Anything to ‘unsettle’ the folks is all, the way I see it...

But 18 more days for ‘sunshine’ to happen!!!


30 posted on 01/02/2017 2:04:34 PM PST by HarleyLady27 ('THE FORCE AWAKENS!!!' Trump/Pence: MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: MNDude
Oh God... what if he appoints HILLARY instead??

It would be the ultimate "poisoning the well".

I honestly wouldn't put it past him.

31 posted on 01/02/2017 2:06:27 PM PST by Ciaphas Cain (The choice to be stupid is not a conviction I am obligated to respect.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

“and with this single gavel strike the 114th congress is concluded AND the 115th congress is hereby in session.”

It’s all about how the transition is worded.


32 posted on 01/02/2017 2:07:07 PM PST by USCG SimTech
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: HarleyLady27

And it is the speculation of the conspiracy theorists


33 posted on 01/02/2017 2:07:32 PM PST by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JayGalt
What are the odds of Garland agreeing to the career risks for a 1 year appointment.

I was wondering the same thing.Several points to consider:

1) Assuming that he,like Obola himself,is a filthy Maoist he might go along with it just as a big "FU" to The Most Dangerous Man To Have Ever Drawn Breath.

2) Depending on how such things are calculated he might get a bigger retirement check having served for even a short period on SCOTUS than by continuing with his current gig.Depending on his age he might find that tempting.

3) There's the obvious prestige in having served on SCOTUS for *any* length of time.Many might find *that* tempting.

34 posted on 01/02/2017 2:07:47 PM PST by Gay State Conservative (Deplorables' Lives Matter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: HarleyLady27

Two points:

1) He would appoint someone much more liberal than Garland.

2) The senate could then nuke the filibuster for SCOTUS and install a much more conservative judge permanently.


35 posted on 01/02/2017 2:08:30 PM PST by Neanderthal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gibsonguy

You are so right about McC, but the people of KY are clueless.


36 posted on 01/02/2017 2:09:00 PM PST by Theodore R. (Let's not squander the golden opportunity of 2017.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: HarleyLady27

This option was shot down on an earlier thread.


37 posted on 01/02/2017 2:09:36 PM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JayGalt

I can’t say because I don’t know anything about the man’s ethics.


38 posted on 01/02/2017 2:10:16 PM PST by onyx (`)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: HarleyLady27

All this will do is put an asterisk next to garland’s name and further stain obama, as it will not be a permanent appointment. So go for it, Mandingo. We’re all laughing at you.


39 posted on 01/02/2017 2:10:43 PM PST by clintonh8r (AMERICA! THANK YOU FOR MAKING MY SCREEN NAME OBSOLETE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HarleyLady27

Why are people so focused on GARLAND. He would never allow his name to be put up this way and lose his lifetime position. But Obama COULD name someone ELSE...and VERY likely will.


40 posted on 01/02/2017 2:11:07 PM PST by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-122 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson