Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 12/30/2016 5:26:23 AM PST by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Kaslin
Obama's motive for (possibly) dropping Hillary's email bombs?

The megolomniac got peeved b/c Hillary didn't run hard enough for his "third term?"

2 posted on 12/30/2016 5:29:05 AM PST by Liz (W W W W W W w w w w w)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

We have yet to be able examine the missing 30,000 H-> emails. Only the Podesta campaign stuff.


3 posted on 12/30/2016 5:29:27 AM PST by Paladin2 (No spellcheck. It's too much work to undo the auto wrong word substitution on mobile devices.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Jug Ears wants to be the head of the Party, what better way to destroy his competitor?


4 posted on 12/30/2016 5:31:22 AM PST by Rumplemeyer (The GOP should stand its ground - and fix Bayonets)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

The Russian hack caused Hillary to lose, and an obscure movie caused Benghazi.


5 posted on 12/30/2016 5:38:09 AM PST by Uncle Miltie (Higher Taxes, Less Freedom, More Bureaucracy! What could possibly go wrong?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Could be, but probably not. Podesta’s emails prove that Obama was communicating with PIAPS on her unsecure server. The fact that he used fictitious names while doing it proves that he knew he shouldn’t be doing it. The fact that he did it in the first place proves he knew her server was unsecure because it wasn’t a .gov account. If anyone were to pursue this, he’d be in hot water as deep as she is. Treason.


9 posted on 12/30/2016 5:47:42 AM PST by MayflowerMadam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

I’ve thought President Stompy Feet was responsible for it from day one. He knew she had done a bad job of running for president Stompier Feet and decided to bring her down, thinking they could slip Biden in at the last minute.


10 posted on 12/30/2016 6:03:26 AM PST by Paleo Pete (When the sun comes up, nitrogen turns into daytrogen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Tactically this makes some sense.
Clear the field of any future Clinton involvement
in running the Rat Party.


11 posted on 12/30/2016 6:04:34 AM PST by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

I do not buy his hypothesi for the following reasons:

1. Omuslim needed a Hilly win to cement his legacy in place. 4 more years of Hilly would mean the ACA stayed in place, borders would stay open, refugees would continue to pour in, the Supreme Court would move well to the left, etc. He did not plan on Hilly losing .... that is apparent by all the stompy foot temper tantrums going on & acts of desperation to try to keep some sort of legacy in place & ruin things for Trump.

2. Wikileaks did not release Hillary’s emails. They released Podesta’s & somewhere along the line, the DNC emails came out (before Podesta’s). The story is that someone from “inside” (perhaps Seth Rich - maybe one day we’ll know for sure), who was disgruntled with the way Bernie was stabbed in the back & the way the Dem primary was rigged for Hilly, was responsible for the DNC leaks. A former ambassador has claimed he picked up the leaked info & delivered it to Wikileaks. I tend to believe this story.

3. While Obama did not want Hilly’s campaign destroyed (as much as he personally dislikes the Clintons, he loves his own legacy more), the “intelligence community” had a vested interest in seeing that Hilly did not become commander-in-chief. By using a private server to protect her pay-to-play schemes & gosh knows what all else she was doing, she put at risk human intelligence sources, probably got a few of them killed, destroyed years/billions in collection methods/resources, and put our nation’s secrets out there for anyone to see. I felt all along that her campaign would be sabotaged by those in the “intelligence community” who could not abide what she had already done & the disdain & lack of regard she would have had for anything but her self enrichment & pursuit of power if she had been elected. The hack itself of the Podesta emails was a piece of cake & easily understood by most folks with a computer, but the release was masterful .... a person at the top of her campaign & definitely close enough to Hilly to damage that campaign, without specifically exposing her private server emails which might point back to the “intelligence community” which probably has them, but through means they won’t disclose to the public.


12 posted on 12/30/2016 6:04:37 AM PST by Qiviut (In Islam you have to die for Allah. The God I worship died for me. [Franklin Graham])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Obozos DOJ let Hillary off the hook and pedestal too. Now they want to blame the Russians with no proof


13 posted on 12/30/2016 6:06:22 AM PST by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
"Who had the motive, the means, and the opportunity" to leak Hillary's most embarrassing secrets, thereby blowing the election?

Neither of these two things happened, so the question and article is moot.

15 posted on 12/30/2016 6:26:17 AM PST by LittleBillyInfidel (This tagline has been formatted to fit the screen. Some content has been edited.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
Oblunder would have to share the stage with Hillary if she had been elected. He can't afford to have any of his programs violated by someone he INTENSELY hates.

Any opportunity to torpedo her campaign even just a little bit would not be out of his doing.
Yes, he campaigned for her, but it was half-hearted, late, and didn't draw in the crowds needed to promote a guarantee of her election.

NOTHING would surprise me if we found all roads, emails, server, Wikileaks, all led back to Oblunder.

20 posted on 12/30/2016 7:18:08 AM PST by Wizdum (Buckle up! It's going to be one hell of a ride.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

I’ll put $10 on this Russian nonsense being a prelude to a Hillary pardon; it’s a fig leaf.

But seriously.

The left contends that Hillary won the popular vote but lost because of hacking.

Huh, whut?


21 posted on 12/30/2016 8:33:30 AM PST by IncPen (I just found out that PIAPS is a reference to the "Pig In A Pants Suit". Ha! #NeverHillary)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

I always thought that Obama would make sure there was something he could blame on the Russians, even if he had to do it. This has a double negative effect for Trump, it undermines the legitimacy of his administration at home and muddies the water in his dealings with the Russians.
Fortunately Obama was the typical miserable failure he is known for. The only people that believe this are the Democrats. The Russians know they did nothing and this is all Obama. I think they should have kicked out the US diplomats and let them back in as soon as Trump took office to make it clear they knew.


23 posted on 12/30/2016 9:59:37 AM PST by HangThemHigh (Entropy's not what it used to be.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

He’s not that smart.


24 posted on 12/30/2016 10:53:11 AM PST by b4its2late (A Liberal is a person who will give away everything he doesn't own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Nothing can change until a few of the elites find themselves in the prison stripes they earned. A petty meth dealer goes to prison; Hillary’s punishment for selling out her country is enormous wealth.


26 posted on 12/31/2016 2:12:03 AM PST by Jacquerie (ArticleVBlog.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson