What if Obama dropped Hillary's email bombs?

American Thinker ^ | December 30, 2016 | James Lewis

[Kaslin]

The phoniest and most irresponsible lie in current politics is Obama's accusation that "the Russians did it!" Dropped Hillary's email bombs, that is. This was originally just attributed to the CIA and FBI at secondhand, and later those agencies reluctantly agreed. But we all know how badly Obama has corrupted those agencies, and their kowtowing to the Big Boss means nothing. This is sad but true.

If you think about this as a mystery story, you can ask, "Who had the motive, the means, and the opportunity" to leak Hillary's most embarrassing secrets, thereby blowing the election? The list of suspects is huge, but Obama is never mentioned. Still, think about it for a second.

Motive: Obama is a major narcissist who always wants to expand his personal power. Being president has not satisfied his power-hungry ego; nothing ever will. For months he has been talking about running for a third term, and he's back at it today.

Washington speculation has long focused on Obama's ambition to become SecGen of the U.N., an office he could try to expand into a genuine power center to achieve the utopian fantasy of the left, a world order in which everything is "properly" controlled from a dictatorial center. This is consistent with the worst kind of Marxism, but it is also the dream of jihad: world conquest.

Obama has shown time and time again that he is a sort of Marxo-jihadophile. Our good friend Recep Erdoğan, the autocrat of Turkey, has just accused the administration of supporting ISIS, showing that this kind of speculation is going on all around the world. In fact, Erdoğan himself is reliably accused of selling Iraqi oil stolen by ISIS on the world market.

So Obama's motive for (possibly) dropping Hillary's email bombs?

[Liz]

Obama's motive for (possibly) dropping Hillary's email bombs?

The megolomniac got peeved b/c Hillary didn't run hard enough for his "third term?"

[Paladin2]

We have yet to be able examine the missing 30,000 H-> emails. Only the Podesta campaign stuff.

[Rumplemeyer]

Jug Ears wants to be the head of the Party, what better way to destroy his competitor?

[Uncle Miltie]

The Russian hack caused Hillary to lose, and an obscure movie caused Benghazi.

[Jimmy The Snake]

I don’t think so - Would he have a better shot at the UN gig w/ HRC in the White House?

I think DNC was Seth Rich and Podesta was a dope that got fished

[dmcnash]

And the DNC stuff. It bears repeating that we have not seen any of the 30,000 deleted HRC emails that DJT joked about the Russians releasing.

[DaveA37]

Something tells me that if Hitlary determines that odumbo actually DID cause her loss to the throne, odumbo’s days may be numbered, as have many before him who crossed her with lesser issues. He would be a dead man and nobody would cry except the snow flakes.

[MayflowerMadam]

Could be, but probably not. Podesta’s emails prove that Obama was communicating with PIAPS on her unsecure server. The fact that he used fictitious names while doing it proves that he knew he shouldn’t be doing it. The fact that he did it in the first place proves he knew her server was unsecure because it wasn’t a .gov account. If anyone were to pursue this, he’d be in hot water as deep as she is. Treason.

[Paleo Pete]

I’ve thought President Stompy Feet was responsible for it from day one. He knew she had done a bad job of running for president Stompier Feet and decided to bring her down, thinking they could slip Biden in at the last minute.

[Buckeye McFrog]

Tactically this makes some sense.
Clear the field of any future Clinton involvement
in running the Rat Party.

[Qiviut]

I do not buy his hypothesi for the following reasons:

1. Omuslim needed a Hilly win to cement his legacy in place. 4 more years of Hilly would mean the ACA stayed in place, borders would stay open, refugees would continue to pour in, the Supreme Court would move well to the left, etc. He did not plan on Hilly losing .... that is apparent by all the stompy foot temper tantrums going on & acts of desperation to try to keep some sort of legacy in place & ruin things for Trump.

2. Wikileaks did not release Hillary’s emails. They released Podesta’s & somewhere along the line, the DNC emails came out (before Podesta’s). The story is that someone from “inside” (perhaps Seth Rich - maybe one day we’ll know for sure), who was disgruntled with the way Bernie was stabbed in the back & the way the Dem primary was rigged for Hilly, was responsible for the DNC leaks. A former ambassador has claimed he picked up the leaked info & delivered it to Wikileaks. I tend to believe this story.

3. While Obama did not want Hilly’s campaign destroyed (as much as he personally dislikes the Clintons, he loves his own legacy more), the “intelligence community” had a vested interest in seeing that Hilly did not become commander-in-chief. By using a private server to protect her pay-to-play schemes & gosh knows what all else she was doing, she put at risk human intelligence sources, probably got a few of them killed, destroyed years/billions in collection methods/resources, and put our nation’s secrets out there for anyone to see. I felt all along that her campaign would be sabotaged by those in the “intelligence community” who could not abide what she had already done & the disdain & lack of regard she would have had for anything but her self enrichment & pursuit of power if she had been elected. The hack itself of the Podesta emails was a piece of cake & easily understood by most folks with a computer, but the release was masterful .... a person at the top of her campaign & definitely close enough to Hilly to damage that campaign, without specifically exposing her private server emails which might point back to the “intelligence community” which probably has them, but through means they won’t disclose to the public.

[Nifster]

Obozos DOJ let Hillary off the hook and pedestal too. Now they want to blame the Russians with no proof

[The Sons of Liberty]

Obama's motive for (possibly) dropping Hillary's email bombs?

Make no mistake about it, 0bama still hates the clintons, but politically can't take overt action that might be deemed "anti party", also expose his corruption, or get him on their "LIST".

[LittleBillyInfidel]

"Who had the motive, the means, and the opportunity" to leak Hillary's most embarrassing secrets, thereby blowing the election?

Neither of these two things happened, so the question and article is moot.

[Liz]

My take is ....yes, he hates them. But he needs the Clintons' get-rick-quick foundation tricks. Plus he's still on the take from then-Secy Hillary's State Dept billion dollar sellout.

Obama's cut of the Saudi monies must have been substantial. B/c Pres Obama and Secy Hillary approved a record $1.4 billion in arms sales to Saudi Arabia.

=================================================

REFERENCE---- The Saudi influence on Obama as a rising star in the political milieu explains why "Hillary ran for Obama's third term." Saudi Royals sucked-up like there was no tomorrow. Turns out they helped stage Hillary's election night "victory"---giving her a huge expensive flat screen TV supposedly to air her crashing through a symbolic 500,000 dollar glass ceiling. (This from a kingdom where women are not allowed to drive).

Saudi Arabia Funded 20% Of Hillary's Presidential Campaign, Saudi Crown Prince Claims
Zerohedge ^ | Jun 14, 2016 3:57 AM | Tyler Durden / FR Posted by xzins

(NOTE: It is illegal in the United States for foreign countries to try to influence the outcome of elections by funding candidates. That appears not to have stopped the Saudis, however.)

“Saudi Arabia provided with full enthusiasm 20 percent of the cost of Hillary Clinton’s election"......the report quoted Saudi Prince Mohammed as having said. According to the US Federal Election commission, over the past two years Clinton has raised a little more than $211.8 million. 20% of this sum is $42.4 million.

The Saudi Press Agency reported on Monday that the senior royal was due to fly to Washington where he will meet Obama admin officials to discuss US-Saudi ties.

--SNIP--

Links between Saudi Arabia and the Clinton family, including Hillary’s campaign, are well reported. In 2008, it was revealed that the Gulf kingdom had donated between $10m and $25m to the Clinton Foundation, a charity set up by Hillary’s husband and former US President Bill Clinton.

Last year the Centre for Studies and Media Affairs at the Saudi Royal Court paid public relations firm the Podesta Group $200,000 for a month-long project to provide “public relations services”. The Podesta Group was founded in 1988 by brothers John and Tony Podesta.

NOTE John Podesta chaired Hillary Clinton’s 2016 campaign, served as Pres Bill Clintons COS, and as Pres Obama's Counsellor.

[Liz]

Secy Hillary arrives in Saudi Arabia----the pay-to-play suckup begins.

[generally]

I agree.

Although nothing would surprise me, I don’t see why 0vomit would do this when he would be better off with Hitlery in the WH instead of Trump. OTOH, it would not be the first time a person who was so filled with rage lashed out at someone and in the end did more damage to himself than to his target. Also, 0vomit is stupid, really, really stupid, so any insane move on his part is a possibility.

[henkster]

I am so disappointed in the American public. So little ability to use critical thinking and evaluation skills. The regime and their propaganda mouthpieces have beaten the drum of “Russia hacked the election” but have never said just how that was done. Wouldn’t we like to know?

So far, they have only said Russia hacked into the DNC server. But if the regime propaganda organs give any credence to Julian Assange’s Wikileaks disclosure of the contents of those e-mails, why do they give no credence to Assange’s statements that it was not the Russians?

Actually, I don’t doubt that the Russians did hack into the DNC’s leaky servers. Just as they were reading Hillary Clinton’s Secretary of State emails before she was. It’s why you have a foreign intelligence service. That’s what they do. If the CIA was not trying to hack into the Russian Foreign Ministry information system, or the servers of the United Russia Party, I would want the agency disbanded because we are getting ripped off.

But still, “facts are stubborn things” and the facts remain that the Russians didn’t rig the democrat primaries, the Russians didn’t collude with the media on the general election, and the Russians didn’t put up a corpse with horrible baggage as a presidential candidate.

It just bothers me that Americans don’t demand that we focus on these things.

[Wizdum]

Oblunder would have to share the stage with Hillary if she had been elected. He can't afford to have any of his programs violated by someone he INTENSELY hates.

Any opportunity to torpedo her campaign even just a little bit would not be out of his doing.
Yes, he campaigned for her, but it was half-hearted, late, and didn't draw in the crowds needed to promote a guarantee of her election.

NOTHING would surprise me if we found all roads, emails, server, Wikileaks, all led back to Oblunder.