Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

DC private schools giving Kellyanne Conway the brush-off
NY Post ^ | December 28, 2016 | Richard Johnson

Posted on 12/29/2016 5:51:59 AM PST by COUNTrecount

Kellyanne Conway is worried establishment elites in Washington, DC, are so prejudiced against President-elect Donald Trump that she won’t be able to get her kids into private school in the nation’s capital.

Conway divulged her fears to other parents at the Elisabeth Morrow School in Englewood, NJ, on Thursday night, when her twins, George and Claudia, performed a concert with other students. Alicia Keys was also there to hear her goddaughter perform.

Conway, who was Trump’s campaign manager, is moving to DC to be counselor to the president. Her husband, George, happens to be the lawyer who wrote the Supreme Court brief when Paula Jones sued Bill Clinton for sexual harassment.

The mother of four had experienced some good-natured razzing from the left-leaning parents at Elisabeth Morrow.

“But after the concert, all the parents converged on Kellyanne, congratulating and sucking up to her,” said one source. “Kellyanne is asking everyone with connections to DC schools for help.”

(Excerpt) Read more at pagesix.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: District of Columbia; US: Maryland; US: Virginia
KEYWORDS: bakethecake; blacklisted; discrimination; kellyanne; kellyannechildren; trumptransition
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-125 next last
To: 9YearLurker

DC ‘education’ liberals need to feel DeVos’ intent gaze on them before pulling stunts like this.


101 posted on 12/29/2016 8:25:07 AM PST by txhurl (Chode: a word about taglines)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: bgill

There’s a huge difference between income and spendable take home. For many, $33k is just an unreachable dream.

Multiply that by her 4 kids. That’s $132k. That’s nothing short of laughable.


Actually the tuition is $39,360/year/child. Though not noted on their website, I know from personal experience that some private schools have sliding scale for second, third, fourth child. Some private schools offer merit scholarships off of admissions testing, though I saw none of that on SF website.

As SF is a private school, things may be more negotiable that what is publicly stated.


102 posted on 12/29/2016 8:31:52 AM PST by Freedom56v2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: bushwon; bgill

Her husband is a successful attorney as well.


103 posted on 12/29/2016 8:34:46 AM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: semimojo
There’s absolutely nothing in the article to support the headline.

If you can't publish fake news, just make the headline fake. This seems to be a trend in journalism. And a tiresome one.

104 posted on 12/29/2016 8:43:59 AM PST by Semper911 (When you want to rob Peter to pay Paul, you'll always have the support of Paul.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Night Hides Not

I can drive to D.C. in just under four hours from my house.
It may as well be on Mars, it’s so different from where I live.

You can literally feel the money bubbling up through the sidewalks at you. The locals are extremely smug....like the five most popular kids at your high-school, on steroids.

When I get to around Hagerstown, Maryland on the drive home, and once again see closed businesses and boarded-up buildings I know I’m back in the real world.


105 posted on 12/29/2016 8:54:33 AM PST by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: JimRed

>
We (our representatives, that is) need to set the example by having our kids either attend public schools, with the attendant security that it entails disrupting everything, or commit to homeschooling. Or how about the new administration folks teaming up to buy an existing charter school? The city would never issue a new charter to such a group, or they’d take several years to do so, but they couldn’t revoke an existing charter!

Then to rub salt in the liberal wounds, they could invite kids from the neighborhood who have stable families stuck there to attend. A little diversity and opportunity.
>

Sure as shit if D.C. can make ‘mandatory service(s)’ *legal* (O’Care, etc.), the same can be done TO govt employees: Every program\service created MUST be utilized by any/all govt employee(s) and their immediate family.

Let ‘em be the guinea pig(s) first and foremost.


106 posted on 12/29/2016 9:08:14 AM PST by i_robot73 ("A man chooses. A slave obeys." - Andrew Ryan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick

Okay, thanks for clearing that up.
Idiot “journalists”.


107 posted on 12/29/2016 9:25:15 AM PST by Bigg Red (To Thee, O Lord, I lift my soul. Thank you for saving our Republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: bgill; litehaus
There’s a huge difference between income and spendable take home.

Yes, that's true, I was just offering the available figure.

$132,000/year in primary-school tuition is a "not like us" thing. When people are not like us, they don't have to care about a lot of the issues that affect us, such the price of food, the price of gas, crime rates, the cost of insurance, etc.

I don't think there's anything wrong with people's being not-like-us, but I do think there's something wrong with how much control they have over everything that affect us but doesn't affect them. We need both a diminution and a devolution in government power: either take the authority away from them entirely, or put it at the city or county level, where the people making the decisions have to live with the results.

108 posted on 12/29/2016 9:32:54 AM PST by Tax-chick (I love Thomas Sowell!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: Bigg Red
Idiot “journalists”.

You can say that again.

109 posted on 12/29/2016 9:34:38 AM PST by Tax-chick (I love Thomas Sowell!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick

Okay, I looked her up. Beautiful young woman. Not my genre of music, though.


110 posted on 12/29/2016 9:38:10 AM PST by Bigg Red (To Thee, O Lord, I lift my soul. Thank you for saving our Republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Bigg Red

It’s not the kind of music I care for, either, but she is very nice-looking. She might be nice, too - I don’t know!


111 posted on 12/29/2016 9:39:22 AM PST by Tax-chick (I love Thomas Sowell!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick

“I don’t think there’s anything wrong with people’s being not-like-us, but I do think there’s something wrong with how much control they have over everything that affect us but doesn’t affect them.
>>We need both a diminution and a devolution in government power: either take the authority away from them entirely, or put it at the city or county level,
>>>where the people making the decisions have to live with the results”

I take it you would favor that amendment a lot of folks want— That congresscritters be subject to ALL/SAME LAWS JUST AS WE ARE ???>


112 posted on 12/29/2016 9:41:45 AM PST by litehaus (A memory toooo long)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: litehaus
I take it you would favor that amendment ...

Oh, absolutely.

However, I would prefer even more that decisions be made by state representatives or county commissioners or city councilmember. I know some of my local officials are crooks - I see a particularly shady ex-county commissioner at the gym several times a week - but they still live here. They're personally affected by the tax rates, the state of the roads, the schools, the sewer system, and the crime.

113 posted on 12/29/2016 9:45:43 AM PST by Tax-chick (I love Thomas Sowell!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Sivana
I also know that a D.C. prep school may not like the complications and risks that may come with the deal.

LOL - tell me - why weren't there 'complications and risks' for Obama's children at Sidwell Friends School? Maybe our side isn't criminal?

Could it be the same reason Trump supporters were roughed up by thugs at our rallies but Hillary didn't have to deal with that kind of violence?

Have you seen the O'Keefe video showing how democrat operatives HIRED VIOLENT STREET PEOPLE TO ROUGH UP TRUMP SUPPORTERS...

THEN TO ADD INSULT TO INJURY THEY RAN TO THEIR FOOLS IN THE MSM AND COMPLAINED ABOUT VIOLENCE?

Reminds me of the guy who killed his parents and threw himself on the mercy of the court because he was an orphan... We MUST NOT live in fear of Democrat thugs, their paid shills, their butt boys in the press, or the violent street people they hire to rough us up. To give into those forces is to accept totalitarians. Kellyanne should be able to place her children in any school - and if the school is afraid to democrat thugs - protection should be provided by DC police. It's NOT our problem that democrats are criminals...

114 posted on 12/29/2016 9:47:48 AM PST by GOPJ (Anyone remember New York Times CRYBULLIES calling for 'moderation' when Obama was elected '08?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker
“I would not characterize myself as ‘worried’ so much as amused by the silence and sighs on the other end of the phone when friends and allies have made preliminary inquiries on our behalf.”

That's the only quote that even hints at an issue, and it's ambiguous. Is the silence from her friends or the schools?

Even if it's from the schools, there are lots of reasons there could be hesitancy. For one, it's the middle of the school year and all of the good private schools are probably over-subscribed with waiting lists.

Kellyanne is working the refs by playing the victim - with very sketchy evidence. I don't blame her - getting your kids into DC private schools is a bloodsport - but there's a lot more implied in this article than is really there.

115 posted on 12/29/2016 10:11:31 AM PST by semimojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: Sooth2222

Don’t know which part of NJ you’re familiar with. Very few parts are Soprano’s territory.


116 posted on 12/29/2016 10:14:52 AM PST by j.argese (/s tags: If you have a mind unnecessary. If you're a cretin it really doesn't matter, does it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ
LOL - tell me - why weren't there 'complications and risks' for Obama's children at Sidwell Friends School? Maybe our side isn't criminal?

I suspect that you are not getting the gist of what I am saying. Private prep schools, to the degree they are political at all, lean liberal on non money issues. Many of the teachers are okay, but the administration tends to draw from a lefty pool. The students tend to come from northeastern old money or overseas. Parents of boarding students are often not terribly involved. If the school is teaching lefty stuff, the Obamas are glad. Kellyanne might well ask them about it. If she speaks of the confrontation publicly, it is no-win for the school. If she withdraws the kid, it is no-win for the school. If a bunch of rich-government execs with kids in the school pull their kids, it is a BIG no-win for the school.

This no slam on Trump or Conway, it is a slam on the reality of a prep school based in an area where the customers (the PARENTS of the kids).
117 posted on 12/29/2016 10:25:20 AM PST by Dr. Sivana (There is no salvation in politics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: semimojo

Finding room for the children of someone with the title of counsel to the president is what DC schools are all about. And if it weren’t a concern, she wouldn’t have enlisted the help of the other parents in their current school. That’s how the Post got the story.


118 posted on 12/29/2016 10:36:36 AM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: JimRed

I am a retired public school teacher and my children could NOT attend public school today.


119 posted on 12/29/2016 10:39:48 AM PST by jch10 (President Trump, President Trump, President Trump! I just love saying that!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount

Liberals! The most intolerant are “liberals”!


120 posted on 12/29/2016 10:49:55 AM PST by minnesota_bound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-125 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson