Liberal Logic (Priceless)

American Thinker ^ | December 17, 2016 | Tom Trinko

[OrangeHoof]

Passing debate questions to a presidential candidate before the debate is a disturbing practice worthy of dismissing any said member of the news media. The candidate ACCEPTING debate questions before the debate is completely fair and ethical.

[mc5cents]

Liberal logic is a perfect example of an oxymoron.

[Boomer One]

One of the best summation articles in a while and worthy of being passed on to others. Thanks for posting it.

[NYer]

So true. And let's not forget Hillary's reaction in the final debate. Recall that Chris Wallace asked (only) Trump if he would accept the election results. When Trump said he would "look at it at the time", Clinton unleashed the following, scathing attack. Also priceless, given her reaction to the actual election results.

This Is What Hillary Clinton Said About NOT ACCEPTING Election Results(VIDEO)!!!

Liberalism at its best.

[Redleg Duke]

The insane are running the asylum...for the next 35-days.

[CA_soon_gone]

We need to stop arguing against the 97% of scientists.
Look up the history of where that number came from. Never did 97% agree on this, it’s a bs made up number from a bs poll. Another lie told often enough to become truth.

[KSCITYBOY]

btt

[wastoute]

Ironic, ain’t it? That the BSM is worked up into such a dither over Fake News? Considering what they have been peddling for decades!

[bert]

George Orwell was right. We think it is 2016 but the reality is Nineteen Eighty-Four

[quantumman]

In the future the only crimes will be thought crimes. Libs only care about feelings not facts and figures.

[Mister Tee]

Tobacco smoke is unhealthy, kills innocent people and only benefits the evil cigarette companies...marijuana smoke is cool, makes life great and to be enjoyed by society!

[djpg]

It is an admirable act of “conscience” for an elector to betray his pledge to support the candidate that his state voted for. It is not an act do conscience to keep that pledge.

[SES1066]

From the article; "A Supreme Court justice who cites foreign laws is a patriot. A Supreme Court justice who cites the Constitution is an extremist."

The difference between the 'living' Constitution and the 'constructionist' view of the actions of the senior judiciary.

[BenLurkin]

bttt

[sauropod]

bkmk

[Carriage Hill]

Bmk.

[fortes fortuna juvat]

We need to stop arguing against the 97% of scientists.
Look up the history of where that number came from. Never did 97% agree on this, it’s a bs made up number from a bs poll. Another lie told often enough to become truth.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Very good point. All of us need to be careful not to inadvertently use deceptive Marxist-inspired verbiage.

[wjcsux]

Excellent read thanks

[snooter55]

BMK