Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Colorado electors plan to challenge state law in bid to derail Donald Trump's victory
The Colorado Springs Gazette ^ | December 3, 2016 | Rachel Riley and The Associated Press

Posted on 12/03/2016 8:00:19 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet

Four of Colorado's nine Electoral College electors plan to challenge a state law that would prevent a long-shot bid to keep President-elect Donald Trump out of the White House.

Robert Nemanich, of Colorado Springs, said Saturday he and three other electors intend to sue Colorado's governor, attorney general, secretary of state and state Democratic Party chairman claiming state law requiring electors to vote for the presidential and vice presidential candidates "who received the highest number of votes at the preceding general election in this state," is unconstitutional....

(Excerpt) Read more at gazette.com ...


TOPICS: Politics/Elections; US: Colorado
KEYWORDS: co2016; colorado; election; electoralcollege; trump; trumptransition; washington; wod
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-131 next last
To: 2ndDivisionVet

“Robert Nemanich, of Colorado Springs, said Saturday he and three other electors intend to sue Colorado’s governor, attorney general, secretary of state and state Democratic Party chairman claiming state law requiring electors to vote for the presidential and vice presidential candidates “who received the highest number of votes at the preceding general election in this state,” is unconstitutional.”

Well, that’ll either be dismissed right away or take 25 years to adjudicate, with the final answer being “No!” or the plaintiffs running out of money, which ever comes first. Basically, this is just a stupid publicity stunt.


41 posted on 12/03/2016 8:26:14 PM PST by catnipman (Cat Nipman: Vote Republican in 2012 and only be called racist one more time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

The only problem with the electoral college, is the electors.

There should NOT BE ANY ELECTORS.

Electors are supposed to do the will of the voters. Thus, the electors don’t really have any say as to how they should be voting, and so, they should be eliminated.

The people spoke, and the electors are only a formality.

Instead of the electoral college being represented by people, just eliminate the people part, and let the electoral college be just a simple number. The number can’t vote. The number represents the same vote as an elector, but it can’t change it’s mind, and therefore, it can’t change the will of the people.

It is the will of the people, and no single person should be granted any power over the will of the people. Not voting the way the people decided, is a betrayal of the will of the people. Any elector that votes against what the people decided, would be disenfranchising thousands, if not millions of people. Assigning a live people to represent “elector counts”, is in itself, contrary to the constitution.

That someone with political beliefs that are contrary to that of the winner of that electoral vote, does not authorize that person to disregard the decision by thousands that are represented by that elector.

It’s time to remove the idea that electoral college votes have to be actual people.


42 posted on 12/03/2016 8:27:24 PM PST by adorno (w)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Aside from insane, these hateful people have too much time on their idle hands.


43 posted on 12/03/2016 8:27:27 PM PST by onyx (CELEBRATE PRESIDENT-ELECT TRUMP'S VICTORY DONATE MONTHLY or JOIN CLUB 300!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: God luvs America
I don't think we're talking weed here.


44 posted on 12/03/2016 8:27:27 PM PST by katana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

so what are they complaining about? The fact that they have to vote for her and they wanna change to donald?


45 posted on 12/03/2016 8:27:30 PM PST by Bob434
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SSS Two

This isn’t about this election cycle... they are attacking the electoral college... if they can get a popular vote..they think they can win every election going forward.


46 posted on 12/03/2016 8:28:49 PM PST by willyd (I for one welcome our NSA overlords)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

This is industrial strength stupid.


47 posted on 12/03/2016 8:29:49 PM PST by rdl6989
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: adorno

Nope.
What if the nominee dies?
What if the nominee is abducted by a foreign power?
What if the nominee ... (insert unusual, unlikely event preventing taking office).


48 posted on 12/03/2016 8:30:55 PM PST by mrsmith (Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat/RINO Party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: God luvs America
"isn’t weed legal in Colorado? that would explain a lot..."

This is more evidence that marijuana causes brain damage.

49 posted on 12/03/2016 8:31:20 PM PST by Sooth2222 ("Every nation has the government it deserves." - Joseph de Maistre (1753-1821))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SSS Two
They can't.

The Good Lord has favored us by making our enemies stupid.

50 posted on 12/03/2016 8:32:07 PM PST by Harmless Teddy Bear (Not a Romantic, not a hero worshiper and stop trying to tug my heartstrings. It tickles!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
It's explicit in the Constitution, but it's UnConstitutional?
51 posted on 12/03/2016 8:34:09 PM PST by Rashputin (Jesus Christ doesn't evacuate His troops, He leads them to victory !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rbg81
What’s the point exactly? CO went for Clinton.

Dude, don't harsh their buzz. They were like, totally baked during the election results. Man, they are just barely starting to see normal, and like; you are totally trashing their mania.

52 posted on 12/03/2016 8:34:24 PM PST by Hodar (A man can fail many times, but he isn't a failure until he begins to blame somebody else.- Burroughs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Bob434

I think the play is to free them to vote for Kasich and convince other Trump electors to do the same...giving a ‘compromise’ Republican candidate for Trump’s electors to coalesce around. Juvenile bullshit.


53 posted on 12/03/2016 8:34:36 PM PST by Mjreagan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
A pointless temper tantrum.

So then they ARE standard Democrats!

54 posted on 12/03/2016 8:39:27 PM PST by Still Thinking (Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

This is the libs twisting themselves into knots like that stupid, moron woman from the west coast who was a pledged Democrat elector and now says she is for Hillary as a “faithless elector”. It’s just the media interviewing their own people again and howling at the moon together.


55 posted on 12/03/2016 8:39:34 PM PST by Luke21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SIDENET
"Second, and more importantly, the leftists in the US are gonna keep pushing until they get a reaction for which they didn't bargain". Let's see...what devilment can we come up with...
56 posted on 12/03/2016 8:40:05 PM PST by Beowulf9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I have no doubt that laws binding electors, once they have been appointed, are unconstitutional.


57 posted on 12/03/2016 8:40:25 PM PST by Jim Noble (Die Gedanken sind Frei)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Plummz
some Hillary electors are also planning on voting for someone like Romney to give the US House a NeverTrump person to vote for

Well, that's a good strategy and totally legitimate - IF they can get Trump below 270.

58 posted on 12/03/2016 8:42:01 PM PST by Jim Noble (Die Gedanken sind Frei)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Mjreagan

this is going to be a very very long 2 months- as those liberal idiots do everything they can to try to undermine the will of the people


59 posted on 12/03/2016 8:43:57 PM PST by Bob434
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Aren’t they required to vote for Clintoonie anyway? Sounds like they been hittin’ da weed a little bit too much.


60 posted on 12/03/2016 8:44:19 PM PST by FlingWingFlyer (As long as tyranny exists, the Constitution and Bill of Right will never be "outdated" or "obsolete")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-131 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson