Posted on 12/03/2016 5:20:03 AM PST by NYer
How often have we heard that ‘climate change’ is the greatest threat to mankind! How often have we heard that Global Warming will lead to an unprecedented rise in sea levels! -- when what is the truth?
There is absolutely no truth whatsoever in these assertions, made by a coven of corrupt scientists, who have held the whole world in thrall. Not only is the globe not warming, but we find that the books have been cooked on a truly massive scale. So massive, in fact, that even intelligent members of Parliament with some scientific knowledge have been fooled. The world at large has been fooled, as witness the bizarre antics at COP22. Did you think that that was a Climate Conference? Think again! It was about nothing but money, and who could screw the most out of the supposedly rich nations.
I am indebted to Christopher Booker, who has written in the Daily Telegraph what I would never have dared to write. He has given a cast of those who have been deceiving the world on an unimaginable scale. Here I quote just a few paragraphs, but it is necessary to read the entire article:
The senders and recipients of the leaked CRU emails constitute a cast list of the IPCC's scientific elite, including not just the "Hockey Team", such as Dr Mann himself, Dr Jones and his CRU colleague Keith Briffa, but Ben Santer, responsible for a highly controversial rewriting of key passages in the IPCC's 1995 report; Kevin Trenberth, who similarly controversially pushed the IPCC into scaremongering over hurricane activity; and Gavin Schmidt, right-hand man to Al Gore's ally Dr James Hansen, whose own GISS record of surface temperature data is second in importance only to that of the CRU itself.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
Catholic ping!
Could anyone please tell me a time in history when there was no climate change going on?
Papa Marx is in on the Scam?
Exactly. Or tell us the “correct” temperature for the world?
It is obvious to anyone with any degree of knowledge of data analysis, that the data have been "adjusted" to fit their model.
If anyone in, say, the pharmaceutical industry had done what these "climate scientists" did, they would be in prison.
Imagine what would happen if the government ‘adjusted’ the unemployment figures to fit their model.
The “American Thinker” article cited here references a “Telegraph” article, but uses a bad link.
The correct link is:
Ping.
"This is probably the most difficult task we have ever given ourselves, which is to intentionally transform the economic development model, for the first time in human history.
"This is the first time in the history of mankind that we are setting ourselves the task of intentionally, within a defined period of time to change the economic development model that has been reigning for at least 150 years, since the industrial revolution. That will not happen overnight and it will not happen at a single conference on climate change, be it COP 15, 21, 40 - you choose the number. It just does not occur like that. It is a process, because of the depth of the transformation."
--Christiane Fugueres, Executive Secretary of UNFCCC
Imagine what would happen if the government adjusted the unemployment figures to fit their model.
They do, the unemployment rate is disconnected to labor participation rate...
Thanks. I know that they do. That was my point. The government is used to fudging the figures to try and alter our perception (and hide that they are stealing our money).
Genesis 2.
LOL
Where is the “global temperature” measured?
Wherever at the time is the hottest?
Whata a SCAM!
Aftere the fall, in the last 6,470 years or so.
According to the warmists, the climate was rock steady until evil Republicans invented the SUV, at which point the temperature started rocketing out of control.
Oh, so now you're gonna get picky?
: )
nope.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.