(Bill Some of it Later? Legal?) Wisconsin Officials Receive Recount Payment From Jill Stein

ABC News ^ | 11-29-16 | Meghan Keneally

[afraidfortherepublic]

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3500820/posts

[Alberta's Child]

You’ll notice my input on that thread, too.

[jonrick46]

What I found may contradict what was said in the “Gateway Pundit”:

http://host.madison.com/wsj/news/local/govt-and-politics/q-a-wisconsin-presidential-recount/article_3516e7c6-2e6f-5b8d-9d0f-ff2916f89f69.html

I hope what was said above is the final word.

[Jim Robinson]

Yes, I know, but it’s not going to happen. They are not going to disenfranchise the entire electorate of a state (and overthrow a valid election) to satisfy the whims of a failed candidate who has zero chance of winning no matter how many times the votes are counted or how long the losing party drags out and delays the phony recount. That’s just flat our un-American and unconstitutional. The courts will get involved and will throw this subversive crap out.

[USFRIENDINVICTORIA]

Only the truly nutty would deny that there are conspiracies. The trick is telling the real ones from the fabulations.

[Lopeover]

She wants the money. Payment for doing this!

[clearcarbon]

Election vote recount workers may be the jobs slick hilly ever creates.

[az_gila]

“...”there was an error in adding up figures” from the state's 72 county clerks, so the actual total is $3,898,340...”

---

It really doesn't look good if they can't simply add up numbers from 72 people.

Doesn't say much about the generic mathematical accuracy in the Elections Dept....:^)

[Stanwood_Dave]

"Payment in full before services are offered. Can't pay, go away!"

Could you help me with just what can a DemocRAT, or anyone else, ask for under Freedom of Information Request, thus bypass[ing] the need to pay-up after services are rendered?

/S