Skip to comments.
Stein wires payment to WI Board of Elections
https://twitter.com/WI_Elections ^
Posted on 11/29/2016 2:30:52 PM PST by dirtboy
Wisconsin Elections @WI_Elections 25s25 seconds ago Wire transfer of $3,499,689 from @DrJillStein has arrived at Wisconsin Elections Commission.
(Excerpt) Read more at twitter.com ...
TOPICS: Breaking News; Politics/Elections; US: Wisconsin
KEYWORDS: 2016recount; boardofelections; election; jillstein; payment; recount; stein; wi2016; wisconsin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161-176 next last
To: Cementjungle
Hillary needs to flip three states.
A tall order.
41
posted on
11/29/2016 2:46:09 PM PST
by
goldstategop
((In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever))
To: goldstategop
She paid the first estimate. they’ll accept the 3.5 as payment enuff to start the recount.
Michigan will of course want 4 million and Pennsylvania will want 10 million ( no paper trail in PA...how does one go about a recount ?)
42
posted on
11/29/2016 2:46:26 PM PST
by
stylin19a
(obama = Fredo smart)
To: blueunicorn6
Not the Presidency, but she might get Secretary of State out of this. She just needs to give a speech ripping Trump as a big stupid ugly racist and that should clinch the position for her.
43
posted on
11/29/2016 2:46:27 PM PST
by
JediJones
(We must deport all liberals until we can figure out what the hell is going on.)
To: stylin19a
Course, now should we even trust the count, much less the recount ? Could be they're having some fun with Dr. Stein, knowing that she's not spending her own money.
I expect the recount to find more Trump vote, and maybe fewer Clinton and Stein votes.
Those Wisconsin folks can be crafty when they want to be!
To: Cementjungle
OK, how bout this....
yesterday there was a post that massive Democrat fraud would be uncovered in wisconsin
That being so, it was noted that Trump could be funding the recount to uncover the democrat fraud and then severely punish the fraudsters
45
posted on
11/29/2016 2:47:13 PM PST
by
Thibodeaux
(Exile Barack, Exile the Wookie, Exile Malia, Exile Shasha)
To: JediJones
Still clinging to your Cruzite butt hurt I see.
46
posted on
11/29/2016 2:47:29 PM PST
by
MNJohnnie
(This revolt is not ending, it is merely beginning.- Pat Caddell)
To: bgill
State employees still have to facilitate the recount, I’d presume. They just don’t let the volunteers have free run of the place, free of security.
47
posted on
11/29/2016 2:47:31 PM PST
by
fwdude
(Stronger, To Get Her)
To: bigbob
WI counties can either do a machine count or a hand count.
Dane and Milwaukee are D strongholds in WI.
48
posted on
11/29/2016 2:47:49 PM PST
by
goldstategop
((In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever))
To: Blue Jays
You want to bet she’s a bill splitter?
49
posted on
11/29/2016 2:48:43 PM PST
by
Hoosier-Daddy
("Washington, DC. You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy. We must be cautious")
To: dirtboy
Jill Stein needs to tell us why she's really doing this. I don't expect any honesty in her answer. The electorate certainly didn't buy her BS.
To: dirtboy
What a colossal waste of money
51
posted on
11/29/2016 2:50:58 PM PST
by
Conserv
To: Cementjungle
Hillary has never spent a dime of her own money running for office.
Being the true Grifters they are, the Clintons ALWAYS have someone else pay their bills for them
52
posted on
11/29/2016 2:51:16 PM PST
by
digger48
To: day10
OK all - whats going on here that we arent seeing?
That's rhetorical, right?
53
posted on
11/29/2016 2:51:20 PM PST
by
Genoa
(Luke 12:2)
To: windsorknot
Electoral integrity, my ass.
Is it really worth $4 million? We’re looking at $20 million (spread out across three states) just to recheck the outcome.
54
posted on
11/29/2016 2:51:31 PM PST
by
goldstategop
((In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever))
To: windsorknot
Do we know if Trump has lawyers on the ground in all the counties? Even if we’re against the recount, we need to make sure that we have the bases covered.
55
posted on
11/29/2016 2:52:06 PM PST
by
sharkhawk
(GO CUBS GO)
To: Repealthe17thAmendment
This should make you happy, and iterates my question about "trusting the count of the recount"
Even before the recount began, Trumps unofficial lead of 22,177 was due to grow by 440 votes, as officials moved to correct a reporting error in Oneida County. Trumps vote in the Town of Hazelhurst had been recorded as 44 instead of 484. (Clintons vote total was 330 in the same town).
56
posted on
11/29/2016 2:52:17 PM PST
by
stylin19a
(obama = Fredo smart)
To: eyeamok
and no one with 1% of the vote should be able to get a recount approved
To: windsorknot
Jill Stein needs to tell us why she's really doing this. I don't expect any honesty in her answer. The electorate certainly didn't buy her BS. Revealing the donor list should shed pretty good light on that. It sort of surprises me that no one in the press seems to be even asking that question. Perhaps they know the answer and don't want to reveal it.
In any case, keeping that list a secret further erodes what little credibility or integrity the Green Party had.
To: JediJones
Oh.
She’s running for President so she can be Secretary of State.
That seems kind of like lying.
59
posted on
11/29/2016 2:53:33 PM PST
by
blueunicorn6
("A crack shot and a good dancer")
To: stylin19a
Trump is likely to pick up more votes at the margins.
But liberals can never leave well enough alone.
60
posted on
11/29/2016 2:53:41 PM PST
by
goldstategop
((In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever))
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161-176 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson