Posted on 11/28/2016 8:49:44 AM PST by SeekAndFind
Most “married” gays still retain their Grindr accounts.
Their “marriages” are in name only. They are just as big health threats.
Homos don’t need marriage as an excuse to remain “monogamous.”
Their whole argument is order from chaos. What starts as chaos cannot, by the laws of entropy, become order by human means.
In addition to the sham marriage, Elton John has had a years-long estrangement from his mother over his relationship with Furnish. John is a sad soul.
I agree, but only insofar as it does not adversely affect another human being of any age...
Besides, it's not nice to fool Mother Nature.
All marriage has ever been to the state in the modern era is whatever judges, pols or the voting majority happen to think it is at any one time. First civil divorce and remarriage, then really easy civil divorce and remarriage, now ‘gay marriage’ and who knows what in another fifty years. Pope Leo XIII warned about the state defining and regulating marriage 130+ years ago. Now many are conditioned to think the state defines and creates marriage, and guess what? They accept the definition changing because civil law changes. The state doesn’t have any other way to define it in the modern era.
Freegards
Introducing religion into the discussion is no help whatsoever!
If we can't discuss the topic, in the secular realm, with the guidance of millenia of civilization, we can't be much of an intelligent species.
Well it does turn out that humanity without God is pretty damned (literally) dumb.
And if you LOOKED at that millennia of civilization, the atheist approach would be seen as the rare exception, until today when Americans and Europeans have been spoiled by the civilizing, load-bearing work that was done before them by, yup, Christianity.
Look for an atheist anywhere in the third world. You might die before finding one. His or her beliefs might seem weird, but not atheist.
All of you are missing the point of “gay marriage.”
It’s not about anything beyond the ability to punish those who will not bow the knee to their proclivities.
The same way they turned action, "Flag Burning" into speech.
Political protest (action) has been legal and part of the definition of the first amendment forever. Examples: Marching, carrying signs, wearing clothing with fags or sayings, squatting outside government buildings, including the WH. All actions.
clothing with flags
Maybe you could just look to Hollywood, they have plenty of kids willing to tell their stories.
I can’t see any change in the new status quo for marriage. The idea that they’d change the policy after many same sex couples have been married isn’t credible to me. I can’t see the government telling people that got “married” that they now aren’t married. I just don’t see it - it’s going to be here for a while.
I’m against it, but I don’t see it changing.
“Maybe you could just look to Hollywood, they have plenty of kids willing to tell their stories.”
I’m not looking anywhere. I’m not the one pushing this “pizzagate” conspiracy theory. The burden is on the ones claiming something is there to produce the evidence.
Yep. I compare flag burning to yelling fire in a crowded theater.
It was never about gays getting married, it was about legitimizing Sodomy.
I encourage young people of Christian values or conservative Jews to have lots of children, and its up to the rest of us out of our child bearing years to support in every way possible these young families...
That would certainly be a blessing.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.