Posted on 11/27/2016 3:37:39 PM PST by Freedom of Speech Wins
Jill Stein has requested a full recount of the presidential election in Wisconsin, alleging that foreign hackers could have skewed the result by obtaining the state’s voter database and then filing bogus absentee ballots.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/nov/25/jill-stein-election-recount-clinton-trump-michigan-pennsylvania-wisconsin
Why isn’t the Corrupt News Network asking to see her evidence?
Are bogus ballots submitted by someone other than the registered voters something checked by a recount, or in Jill Stein asking for the wrong remedy to the suspected problem?
Why, you know, it's the "seriousness of the charge" that counts!
I allege that Jill Stein is an alien pod who was placed here by Satan to destroy the American Republic. I think I can find more evidence to back my premise than she can her bogus hacking story where there is absolutely no corroberative evidence.
What say your FREEPERS?
Explain why they only did it to these three states, Jill.
That is a rather specious claim.
You cannot vote absentee unless you request an absentee ballot. How would hackers know ahead of time who voted and who didn’t, and then request absentee ballots for the non-voters?
If there were ballots introduced fraudulently into the election (and I have no doubt that some were), they almost certainly are Hillary votes. So, if a recount could determine which ballots those are, the overall total would change in favor of Trump.
Proof, Jill? None exists. I see.
Foreigners do not CARE about our election, unless she means Soros helped out Hillary...that I could believe.
“alleging that foreign hackers could have skewed the result”
That’s pretty weak.
The woman has no vested interest in the recount at all.
Only those who have a possibility of winning by way of a recount should be allowed to request one.
This is clearly foul play.
The only people who do this kind of crap in WI are democrats.
Fake news.
Hackers filed bogus absentee ballots? What drug is this woman on? She’s a whack job. I’m seeing a lot of people online who say they voted for her and they wish they had a do-over!
I don’t know how you can prove this. All those variables and suppositions.
She’s a barking moonbat nutjob with a conspiracy theory about Russian hackers hacking Michigan’s paper ballots.
She has no evidence.
The petition presents speculation and a hypothetical series of events that might compromise election technologies, but presents no information that any such compromise has occurred and no information that any of those hypothetical events have occurred.
Her petition specifically states in item 3(g) that a manual recount is necessary to determine if any evidence exists to support her belief.
Wisconsin law [Wis. Stat. § 9.01(1)(a)2.b] states the petitioner must be “informed and believe”, both must be true. Being informed means “possessing information”, “based on information”, “understanding the facts”. She has presented no facts to inform her belief.
Her petition should be denied.
Stalinists lie. ALWAYS
Most of WI has paper ballots. I have always voted on paper ballots.
You got that right.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.