Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Election Recount to Begin in Wisconsin Following Green Party Petition, Officials Say (maybe)
NbcNews ^ | 11/25/2016 | ADAM HOWARD and ALEXANDRA JAFFE

Posted on 11/26/2016 2:24:06 PM PST by GilGil

The fine print on her website tells donors that she cannot guarantee that a recount will happen and that any surplus money raised will go towards "election integrity efforts and to promote voting system reform." All of their money has come from private citizens, the Green Party does not accept corporate donations.

(Excerpt) Read more at nbcnews.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Wisconsin
KEYWORDS: 2016; 2016recount; clinton; election; hillary; jillstein; recount; stein; trump; wi2016; wisconsin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-75 next last
To: DarthVader

Darth, please recite your credentials for the record. (I agree with you, I remember you stating how you know such things from another thread, I want it on-record.)


41 posted on 11/26/2016 4:05:35 PM PST by Lazamataz (TRUMP WINS!!!! TRUMP WINS!!!! TRUMP WINS!!!! TRUMP WINS!!!! TRUMP WINS!!!! TRUMP WINS!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: GilGil

https://americanlookout.com/jpb-flashback-hillary-said-not-accepting-election-results-was-direct-threat-to-democracy-video/

Are Hillary’s supporters supporting her words?


42 posted on 11/26/2016 4:06:42 PM PST by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LS

Well, the concern trolls don’t quit when he’s elected.

They drove me off of FR most of October until after the election when I figured it was finally safe to venture back. Maybe I was wrong.


43 posted on 11/26/2016 4:12:48 PM PST by usmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

Of course not. You know they’re not going to hold her to any standard of practicing what she preaches, so it’s a waste of time trying to call them on it.


44 posted on 11/26/2016 4:13:59 PM PST by TwelveOfTwenty (Clinton's actions speak louder than Trump's words.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

I am an election officer and a political activist. The problem with Stein doing this is 2-fold. One she had roughly 2% of the vote and the money she got looks to be laundered through a bot and backed by Soros or other corrupt millionaires. This whole recount affair is frivolous.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frivolous_litigation

The claims of frivolity will be very easily made by Trump’s attorney.


45 posted on 11/26/2016 4:19:59 PM PST by DarthVader ("These lying tyrants are about to get hit with a tsunami of destruction on their evil reign." Gaffer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

Here is more:

http://www.dailywire.com/news/11095/7-reasons-jill-steins-recount-scam-aaron-bandler?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=social&utm_content=062316-news&utm_campaign=benshapiro


46 posted on 11/26/2016 4:22:40 PM PST by DarthVader ("These lying tyrants are about to get hit with a tsunami of destruction on their evil reign." Gaffer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Principled

If Wisconsin allows this, they should go ahead with the electoral vote and just leave them out. Stupid,there is no basis for a recount.


47 posted on 11/26/2016 4:30:29 PM PST by Hattie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: TwelveOfTwenty

In one of the articles that came out BEFORE the election when the whole idea of Trump not accepting the election results was going around, one said that Pennsylvania doesn’t have to agree to a recount unless the petitioner shows evidence of irregularity in the vote counts.


48 posted on 11/26/2016 4:47:14 PM PST by JediJones (We must deport all liberals until we can figure out what the hell is going on.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: LS

The problem is, that you don’t know what you don’t know. Unknown unknowns, as Rumsfeld would say.

Never, ever, underestimate the ability of a Clinton to pull a tremendous lie out of their ass, or the obseciance of the msm in taking their side.

Plus, she has too much to lose. Either this Ardennes offensive works, or she faces an uncomfortable prospect of being brought up on charges.

When have these people ever NOT cheated?


49 posted on 11/26/2016 5:00:26 PM PST by OKSooner (Geno's is a tourist trap.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Bobalu

The machine s can’t be hacked in one of the states A. They usea paper ballot and B. The tabulator is never connected to the internet.


50 posted on 11/26/2016 5:05:18 PM PST by stockpirate (OBAMA MUST BE ON THE PAYROLL OF THE CLINTON FOUNDATION.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

fighting for wacky causes like this? sorry that does nothing to raise her credibility in my eyes


51 posted on 11/26/2016 5:07:45 PM PST by b4me (If Jesus came to set us free, why are so many professed Believers still in chains?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: buffaloguy

Trump would still win. If the electoral votes of those states aren’t actually flipped in Hillary’s favor he’ll still lead in electoral votes. Hillary can’t win if the recounts are still ongoing and the votes aren’t actually flipped in her favor when the EC votes.


52 posted on 11/26/2016 5:08:01 PM PST by ScottfromNJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: GilGil

The White House put out a statement that the election is over, Trump is president-elect. So they’re not getting support from that quarter.


53 posted on 11/26/2016 5:10:29 PM PST by EDINVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: b4me

It is not your eyes that she is interested in. It is people on the left.


54 posted on 11/26/2016 5:30:11 PM PST by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: TwelveOfTwenty

Correct.


55 posted on 11/26/2016 5:34:55 PM PST by Nuc 1.1 (Nuc 1 Liberals aren't Patriots. Remember 1789!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TwelveOfTwenty

Don’t forget the SOS of Wisconsin is Soros SOS Project person. She will do anything she is told by her masters.


56 posted on 11/26/2016 5:42:46 PM PST by Nuc 1.1 (Nuc 1 Liberals aren't Patriots. Remember 1789!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: buffaloguy

The state assembly, not certain which house, would apportion the electors.


57 posted on 11/26/2016 5:51:02 PM PST by Nuc 1.1 (Nuc 1 Liberals aren't Patriots. Remember 1789!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: CurlyDave

It is even better than that. The state has not even decided how many millions have to change hands. They are estimating that, but I bet they don’t really get started until Monday,

So, Tues or Wed they tell Jill how much it will cost and Jill has to pony up before anything starts. And, the money is completely lost. The recount instigator has to pay for the recount unless they win the election. Jill is so far behind she can not possibly win. Money thrown into the swamp.

________________

Finally some sanity! Wait until the real figures come in. Government charges are always devoid of reality. I am thinking at least $5 million to start for all 3 states. Stein would have a better outcome if she got $5 million in cash and cracked a match to it. The money would be gone but someone would get some heat from it. Anyone with a brain sees this is a sucker’s bet.All theater!


58 posted on 11/26/2016 6:17:05 PM PST by GilGil (E. Deplorabus Unum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Hattie
If Wisconsin allows this, they should go ahead with the electoral vote and just leave them out.

According to Wisconsin rules concerning recounts in a presidential election, the state has until 13 December to finish the recount, or their electoral votes will be thrown out.

I personally believe the recount request was timed to produce that precise result.

I also believe that the Clintons have strategies worked out for Pennsylvania and Michigan, too, though we'll have to wait til Monday to see what those are.

Make no mistake. They're desperately trying to steal this thing.

59 posted on 11/26/2016 6:34:34 PM PST by Windflier (Pitchforks and torches ripen on the vine. Left too long, they become black rifles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: DarthVader

Yes I agree the recount is frivolous. I also agree claims of frivolity can be easily made. What I also know is that truth is irrelevant to marxists courts and Wisconsin is full of them. Thankfully the Wisconsin Supreme Court is an ethical and moral court. When it goes against the marxists in a state court they will take the matter to a friendly federal court. The venue is important in this b/c as I am certain you know the lower federal court ruling just before the SCOTUS will stand due to the divided Supreme Court. I do not believe the PIAPS will win the electoral college or even send the election to the Congress. I do believe they will do everything they can to delegitimize Trumps Presidency and cause endless problems. The Sorous threat needs to be eliminated and the integrity of the ballot box restored.


60 posted on 11/26/2016 6:42:29 PM PST by Nuc 1.1 (Nuc 1 Liberals aren't Patriots. Remember 1789!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-75 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson