Posted on 11/21/2016 6:57:30 AM PST by COUNTrecount
Jeanine Pirro is said to be in the running for a top job in the Trump administration.
The Fox News host and former Westchester DA — a longtime friend and early backer of President-elect Donald Trump — was spotted on Thursday morning going into Trump Tower with Rudy Giuliani
(Excerpt) Read more at pagesix.com ...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OWk2G-cgoMw
I’ll go for that.
This is just too much winning.
NAW! Just Joking!!!
GO TRUMP!
Judge Jeanine for SCOTUS?
She’d be good for theater oversight.
For what?
Let’s put her in charge of the NEA.
Just because she walks into Trump Tower with Rudy doesn’t necessarily mean she’s applying for a job. She might have been wanting to talk about Trump doing an appearance on her show.
Put her on The View.
Let's get rid of the NEA.
SCOTUS might be going too far. Returning to the bench as a federal judge — very doable.
Judge Jeanine will be good anywhere!
...Oh well, one can dream
...of course there's not enough popcorn in the world for that anyway.
If true, and if the rumors of Eric Bolling from Fox News and Laura Ingraham are also true, it seems as if Trump is taking an interesting tack. That is, it would seem, select strongly credentialed and competent people from government for selected positions (SecDef and AG, for example) and sprinkle in conservative media people for other positions, people who are outstanding at communicating and not afraid of the press at all. If that’s the case, it signals Trump is stocking up weapons for a probable war with the media. Very cool!
She could take on those three commie harpies, Justices Sotominor, Ruth Buzzi Ginsburg and Elena Kookin with just one of her deadly stares.
At any rate, she should be given a high-profile spot, not buried away at a desk day-in, day-out in a DC mausoleum building as Secretary of Nothingball. Better she remains on TV.
Leni
BOTH of them...............
>>Judge Jeanine for SCOTUS?<<
Good grief, one could only hope. What a freaking bull dog.
Agree, only I’d note these were each well educated and experienced people in the real world before turning to a career in the media ;-) In other words, they actually know something and have a track record, unlike the Katie Pavlich, Mandy Carpenter, et al’s of the media world.
Why would a misogynist nominate a woman? /s
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.