Posted on 11/19/2016 11:20:11 AM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Rumors are that Donald Trump might pick John Bolton for Secretary of State. Heaven forbid.
One of the things I occasionally liked about the President-elect was his opposition to the Iraq war and regime change. He not only grasped the mistake of that war early, but also seemed to fully understand how it disrupted the balance of power in the Middle East and even emboldened Iran.
We liberated Iraq, but today their best friend is Iran, their second greatest ally is Russia, and their third strongest alliance is with Syria. Trump really seems to get the lesson. Hillary Clinton never did.
Most importantly right now, John Bolton never learned and never will.
Bolton is a longtime member of the failed Washington elite that Trump vowed to oppose, hell-bent on repeating virtually every foreign policy mistake the U.S. has made in the last 15 years — particularly those Trump promised to avoid as president.
John Bolton more often stood with Hillary Clinton and against what Donald Trump has advised.
None of this is secret. It’s all out there. Perhaps the incoming administration should take a closer look.
Bolton was one of the loudest advocates of overthrowing Saddam Hussein and still stupefyingly insists it was the right call 13 years later. “I still think the decision to overthrow Saddam was correct,” Bolton said just last year.
Trump, rightly, believes that decision was a colossal mistake that destabilized the region. “Iraq used to be no terrorists,” Trump said in 2015. “(N)ow it’s the Harvard of terrorism.”
“If you look at Iraq from years ago, I’m not saying he was a nice guy, he was a horrible guy,” Trump said of Saddam Hussein, “but it was a lot better than it is right now.”
Trump has said U.S. intervention in Iraq in 2003 “helped to throw the region into chaos and gave ISIS the space it needs to grow and prosper.” In contrast, Bolton has said explicitly that he wants to repeat Iraq-style regime change in Syrian and Iran.
You can’t learn from mistakes if you don’t see mistakes.
Trump has blamed George W. Bush, Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton for helping to create ISIS — but should add John Bolton to that list, who essentially agreed with all three on our regime change debacles.
In 2011, Bolton bashed Obama “for his refusal to directly target Gaddafi” and declared, “there is a strategic interest in toppling Gaddafi… But Obama missed it.” In fact, Obama actually took Bolton’s advice and bombed the Libyan dictator into the next world. Secretary of State Clinton bragged, “We came, we saw, he died.”
When Trump was asked last year if Libya and the region would be more stable today with Gaddafi in power, he replied “100 percent.” Mr. Trump is 100 percent right.
No man is more out of touch with the situation in the Middle East or more dangerous to our national security than Bolton.
All nuance is lost on the man. The fact that Russia has had a base in Syria for 50 years doesn’t deter Bolton from calling for all out, no holds barred war in Syria. Bolton criticized the current administration for offering only a tepid war. For Bolton, only a hot-blooded war to create democracy across the globe is demanded.
Woodrow Wilson would be proud, but the parents of our soldiers should be mortified. War should be the last resort, never the first. War should be understood to be a hell no one wishes for. Dwight Eisenhower understood this when he wrote, “I hate war like only a soldier can, the stupidity, the banality, the futility.”
Bolton would not understand this because, like many of his generation, he used every privilege to avoid serving himself. Bolton said, with the threat of the Vietnam draft over his head, that “he had no desire to die in a Southeast Asian rice paddy.” But he’s seems to be okay with your son or daughter dying wherever his neoconservative impulse leads us: “Even before the Iraq War, John Bolton was a leading brain behind the neoconservatives’ war-and-conquest agenda,” notes The American Conservative’s Jon Utley.
At a time when Americans thirst for change and new thinking, Bolton is an old hand at failed foreign policy.
The man is a menace.
Our Constitution and our founding fathers were explicit war was not to be fought without the permission of Congress. No matter which party occupies the White House, I will not shrink from my constitutional duty to oppose any advocate for war.
The true statesmen realizes, with reluctance, that war is sometimes necessary but as a country, we should resist any would-be leader who wants to bomb now and think later.
President-elect Donald Trump campaigned on changing our disastrous foreign policy. To appoint John Bolton would be a major first step toward breaking that promise.
Rand Paul is the junior senator from Kentucky.
Bolton...I’d call him the Kissinger for this time
in this case, i’m in complete agreement with rand. just say no to bolton.
Bolton is a neocon. No thanks.
I love John Bolton and pray he is appointed secretary of state.
Bolton would be good as UN ambassador, but not as Secretary of State.
Not my favorite, yet he’d be the best one since George Schultz
If Trump hires Bolton he is sending a message that will irritate a lot of the right people.
I don’t think either Bolton or Romney will be Trump’s Secretary of State. I think he’ll pick a mere figurehead to be at State the way JFK picked Dean Rusk as his SOS and Nixon picked William Rogers to be his too while both presidents essentially ran the nation’s foreign policy from the White House. I can picture Trump doing something similiar to what those two presidents did.
Bolton may have a lot of fans here on FreeRepublic, but we also have a lot of folks who have done the research to expose his background.
He would have been a perfect Secretary of State.
For Hillary Clinton.
I have seriously had no problem with those we perceive to be actual Trump hired hands. It seems to me there are two or three jobs in any administration that you could put Bolton as a giant on the world stage.
If Trump hires Bolton he is sending a message that will irritate a lot of the right people.
You are exactly right!
“the Kissinger for this time”
That would not be good.
I can not accept Mitt Romney for any office in this Adm. but it is Trump's decision regarding both men..
He is the one who has to work with them...I am nothing but a grain of sand..so it will be who it will be...
so tired of the way media and politicians are treating Trump/Pence, that I will never vote for a liberal or a democRAT.
There is a danger for falling in love with guys who act tough on foreign policy, but that is the same way I felt when I used to hear Bolton speak. In hindsight, I now know that you can talk tough AND STUPID, at the same time. So, I say NO to John Bolton.
Bolton has a very good understanding of foreign affairs and diplomatic relations. However, the points that Rand makes are accurate in many ways. The question becomes - was Bolton towing the line for the person he worked for or was he representing his own views.
If Trump believes Bolton will carry out his vision to the letter I am not too concerned about Bolton’s past comments. If Trump is not certain that Bolton shares his vision this would be a mistake. I would have the same concerns with Romney.
This is, in my opinion, the most difficult pick for Trump because he not only needs 100% loyalty in the position, but he needs gravitas because we have a lot of damage to repair with our relationships to long-term allies. A lot of damage. The Obama administration did not do right by our friends and we have a serious trust deficit.
You can't "drain the swamp" in Washington by hiring some jack@ss who has been living there breathing the putrid fumes for 30+ years.
Rand Paul trying to make himself relevant again. Apple Tree.
No, thanks. I will hold a very dim view of Donald Trump and his administration if he nominates this jerk to any position of authority in his administration.
Donald Trump has made a very strong, assertive move by forcing prospective senior administration officials to sign an agreement to refrain from lobbying for five years after they leave office. He would do himself -- and this country -- a great favor by eliminating anyone from consideration who has worked as a lobbyist for the LAST five years, too.
That would eliminate a lot of people who should be permanently exiled from the Beltway. John Bolton would be one of them.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.