well, this didn't take long!
1 posted on
11/08/2016 11:55:49 PM PST by
llevrok
To: llevrok
Never count your chickens until they’ve hatched.
2 posted on
11/08/2016 11:56:34 PM PST by
Morgana
( Always a bit of truth in dark humor.)
To: llevrok
No kidding! Trump isn’t even off the stage yet!
3 posted on
11/08/2016 11:57:36 PM PST by
BradyLS
(DO NOT FEED THE BEARS!)
To: llevrok
The toughest opponent, IMO, would be Cuomo.
4 posted on
11/08/2016 11:57:47 PM PST by
TBP
(0bama lies, Granny dies.)
To: llevrok
Maybe there should be a list of Newpapers, magazines and pollsters that will no longer exit by 2020.
Mother Jones is one.
5 posted on
11/08/2016 11:58:05 PM PST by
bobo1
(Truth has but only one voice.)
To: llevrok
Liberal bed-wetters in full ‘slit-my-wrists’ mode.
To: llevrok
That looks like too many white people to satisfy the racist Democrat voter base. Of the non-whites, I can say that Corey Booker is a Wall Street tool who actually has very little charisma, and Wookie is another useless First Lady who would get smashed just like Hitlery.
7 posted on
11/09/2016 12:00:02 AM PST by
Objective Scrutator
(All liberals are criminals, and all criminals are liberals)
To: llevrok
And soon the cry will go out: vote fraud! LMAO!
8 posted on
11/09/2016 12:00:16 AM PST by
snuffy smiff
(Blessed be the Lord my Rock, who trains my hands for war, my fingers for battle...)
To: llevrok
Do the Democrats have a “diversity” candidate? Such a candidate will be run.
To: llevrok
Your queen couldn’t do it.
Give it up and take the bread crumbs...
11 posted on
11/09/2016 12:08:11 AM PST by
Vendome
(Don't take life so seriously-you won't live through it anyway - "Enjoy Yourself" ala Louis Prima)
To: llevrok
These twits. If hillary had won, there probably wouldnt be an election in 2020 cuz we wouldnt have a country.They think they can calculate the future as if survival is assured. Just poorly thinking emotobots
13 posted on
11/09/2016 12:11:15 AM PST by
Getready
(Wisdom is more valuable than gold and diamonds, and harder to find.)
To: llevrok
Kamala Harris will be the nominee.
To: llevrok
Do you
really gotta post this shit this soon? Give the guy a minute to fart in the Oval Office, m'kay?
15 posted on
11/09/2016 12:14:15 AM PST by
Viking2002
(My ttitude in your rear view mirror may be bigger than it appears......)
To: llevrok
20 posted on
11/09/2016 12:29:06 AM PST by
cyn
(Benghazi -- is all we need to know about hilliary)
To: llevrok
Given how bad the last 8 years of liberal utopia have been... Just about anything President Trump does is going to be a tremendous improvement. Heck, he doesn't even have to do anything - just get the government out of the way and American business will find a way to snap back. There is a lot of pent-up potential out there just waiting for the yoke of government oppression to be removed.
The next 4 years are going to be some of the most successful this century. If my gut feeling/prediction holds true - there's no 'rat bastard that will stand a chance against President Trump's record of record level success.
22 posted on
11/09/2016 12:41:31 AM PST by
ThunderSleeps
(Stop obarma now! Stop the hussein - insane agenda!)
To: llevrok
I’m surprised they didn’t come up with the “historic hermaphroditic Eskimo” candidate.
25 posted on
11/09/2016 12:54:13 AM PST by
euram
To: llevrok
Talk about an ill-timed, tone-deaf message!
To: llevrok
30 posted on
11/09/2016 1:18:21 AM PST by
McGruff
(#HillaryForPrison #DrainTheSwamp)
To: llevrok
LOL! What a list and fumbling attempt to portray their "strengths".
With Trump in the hot seat, one can safely bet that conventions of yesterday being no longer relevant, the perceived conventions of today will also no longer be relevant in 3 years.
He will be a hard act to catch.
32 posted on
11/09/2016 3:43:33 AM PST by
trebb
(Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson