Posted on 11/08/2016 10:18:22 AM PST by xzins
I remember that. I knew a lady that was the court stenographer at the Nuremberg Trials.
There were 2 states that don’t. My memory might have been right about Michigan, but obviously wrong about PA. The other state was also a toss-up state...I remember that.
Her support was down all along. Nobody just changed their mind in the last couples days. HILLARY voters don’t think that way. Well they don’t thinkin period.
The LSM just need an excuse to change their polls to the truth.
Awesome!
It would be great if California democrats were so over-confident and California millennials so uninspired and California worker class trump voters so determined that California ended up going for Trump.
Now THAT would get my attention.
It would make CNN weep. Might make Soros and Clinton both get overcome by what ails them.
No. All I’m saying is how I’m interpreting the Title: “Likely Turnout Poll”
It means she isn’t getting the turnout they projected. But that must mean their “likely voter” model was bad.
I saw one of the pollsters likely voter model and for those who hadn’t ever voted or who hadn’t voted in a long time they had to answer 5 or more on a scale of 10 that they would actually go vote.
At the time, it seemed to me that if I wrote down “5” that I’d be saying 50/50.
That seems a sorry way to say someone is a ‘likely voter’.
__________________________________________________________________
Hmm....OK, interesting! Thanks for clarifying!
That news would be overshadowed by the reports of hell freezing over.
So it’s not that there’s a trend downward over the last few days, but they’re simply adjusting the numbers to comport with a reality they’ve known all along?
No problem. I get to gushing sometimes when I write, and even I don’t know what I said when I go back to read it.
Reuters deleted the poll results after November 3rd.
No explanation, just gone!
I went to their site, because it can be difficult to navigate... but you are absolutely right. Amazing!!! They are trying to suppress the vote. When you do a “Google” search on Reuters what comes up is a statement they released today claiming Hillary has a 90% chance of winning.
But they published the real numbers briefly and now have made them unavailable so they can claim that they were the most accurate later.
Rotflol!!
Probably.
Someone posted this on gatewaypundit.com.
Dan Quist
The archived version of the site shows through Nov 6. So they did change it.
http://archive.is/B12MC
Like · Reply · 3 ·
It is an archive of the Reuter’s poll on Nov. 6th.
No, Obama is going to pardon her.
Rush yesterday apologized for getting it wrong when he said that the polling firms would start adjusting Trump upward just before the election. He said it hadn't happened, and he wanted to get it on the record he was wrong. Now this. They carried it on over to election day. Rush was right all along.
You guys must have a really big house.
Ray Comfort is one of my heroes.The tracts are awesome.
We'll have some answers soon because VT polls close at 7. Sanders beat her 86 to 14 percent in the primary there. It'll be interesting to see how many turned out for her...and how many did not.
They are the best I have ever seen.
Michigan uses paper. Connect the line with magic marker. Tabulated mechanically.
CC
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.