Posted on 10/29/2016 1:58:43 PM PDT by Zakeet
The FBI found emails pertinent to its Clinton investigation, reportedly on a computer from her aide's home. That doesn't jibe with she told lawyers this summer.
[Snip]
On June 28, 2016, Abedin said under oath in a sworn deposition that she looked for all devices that she thought contained government work on them so the records could be given to the State Department. (These records were subsequently reviewed by the FBI.)
"How did you go about searching for what records you may have in your possession to be returned to the State Department?" Attorney Ramona Cotca for Judicial Watch asked her.
"I looked for all the devices that may have any of my State Department work on it and returned - returned - gave them to my attorneys for them to review for all relevant documents. And gave them devices and paper," Abedin answered.
(Excerpt) Read more at thedailybeast.com ...
Any of you Freepers think Huma will come out of this alive? ... or Granny Pickles? ... or the Weiner?
Huma will skate, so will Hilliary et al.
The next time you see Huma, she will be in Riyadh.
Isn’t there a regulation against lying under oath?
Oopsy
Hillary with throw Huma under the bus in a New York minute to save her own skin.
She didn’t intend to lie to the FBI.
She probably got immunity along with every other crook involved in this thing.
When I was a kid, what Ms. Weiner did would have been a crime and would be in jail right now awaiting trial. Unfortunately, that was when America was a nation of laws and not a third world, banana republic sewer.
Oaths mean nothing to these people.
The FBI is angry because she was supposed to give them all the evidence so they could destroy it. Imagine their surprise when the NYPD discovered evidence on Wiener’s laptop computer.
Perhaps they can start appealing to the no-such-thing-as-free will defense?
I hope the FBI has read Mirandized her and arrested her for lying to the Bureau. It is her only hope.
All she has to say is, “I did not think that computer contained government information.”
If the e mails were on Weiner’s computer she could truthfully testify that there were no emails on devices in her possession
“Isnt there a regulation against lying under oath?”
Not if you have a (D) after your name.
However mis-remembering a date under oath in a case where not only no crime was committed but also you had nothing to do with “non existent crime” will get you ScooterLibbyized and go to jail if you have an (R) after your name
Dear Humma Weiner,
Eat the salad, roll the bean, munch the carpet.
...and stay away from Fort Marcy Park.
With much love, Ed D.
Oops, sorry, I forgot that one and those over there and these and ...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.