But Pewtin’s a friend.
And the bad news is?
I thought Jimmy Carter took care of that with SALT.
You do not tug on Superman’s cape, and you don’t mess around with Vlad.
:: Putin’s Nukes Could Wipe Out Entire American East Coast In Minutes ::
Well..dayum!
We will miss y’all yankees.
And, Thanks to Hillary, they now know there is a 4 minute response time.
Obama and Hillary are busy picking fights with Russia.
Trump is busy telling voters that we’ve destroyed our own military strength.
. . and Make America Great Again!!
And the problem with wiping out a potfull of progressives is?
I am also very concerned about our recent behavior towards Russia, and that is just one more reason (if another one was needed) to vote for Trump. But a nuclear attack by Russia would be suicidal, and I don’t believe that the Russians would risk annihilation to save Assad.
Basically the situation for, oh....around the last 50 years.
He is not going to send any bombs our way.
Could Putin maybe split them up between the upper NE coast and the lower SW coast? That would solve a lot of problems in one fell swoop.../s
Yeah, but in response we would send Putin a strongly-worded letter saying that wasn’t a very nice thing to do. And boy that would show him.....
Maybe Putin could just nuke the west coast, instead? Or, stick to the upper east coast and maybe throw in the west coast areas too, as a bonus?
This has been true from about 1960 on wards.
My view is that while Putin is not suicidal, things could escalate. For example multiple American and Russian planes shot down in Syria. Mutual attacks on Russian and American airbases.
Maybe the Russians get tagged particularly hard, and fire a nuclear-tipped Sunburn missile (or several) at a carrier to retaliate. Then instantly 7,000 sailors are vaporized.
And then they immediately announce any nuclear attack on Russian soil, whether or not it targets civilian or military would result in an immediate nuclear strike on a major US city.
Then the question is, what does the US do in return?
How far can I travel in 4 minutes?
This is ANOTHER “deliberate, Hillary-news-media-coordination ploy: SCARE the voters by “threatening the voters” with a Donald Trump-Russia-linked nuclear threat, while ignoring the collusion between Hillary and Russia, between Oboma-Kerry-Hillery and THEIR LONG-SERVING communist policies and anti-America policies THAT SUPPORT the threat against America!
Use Hillary’s “vast experience” (in foreign affairs” and “in the White House”) to draw down Trumps’ appeal. Ignore her incompetence and HER failures during ALL of those long years, but play up the fears that ignorant voters have about Donald’s impromptu and on-the-fly statements.
(Hillary’s focus-group-tested, pre-planned and totally programmed responses are “safer” in the real world? ) Well, according to the Never-Trumpets in Washington who program Hillary and program the Washington consultants, “yes” . Hillary is “safer”.
First of all, they are not “Putin’s” nukes.
Second, this has been the case for the last 50 years. Why are they re-hashing this now??