Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Axelrod: I’ll bet the house that Michelle Obama never runs for office
hotair.com ^ | 10/21/2016 | Ed Morrissey

Posted on 10/21/2016 8:18:07 AM PDT by rktman

With Hillary Clinton reaching the end of a generation-long quest to return the Clintons to the White House — successful or not — some are pondering the First Lady-to-POTUS model in the future. With Michelle Obama hitting the hustings hard for Hillary*, that question obviously applies in the present tense. Don’t worry, former Barack Obama campaign chief tells Hugh Hewitt this morning — he’d bet “everything I own” that the current First Lady wants a non-electoral life when Barack Obama retires in January:

(Excerpt) Read more at hotair.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: yewwwww
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last
Oh crap. Axleshaft said that? You know he's lying. As usual. I propose that someone, anyone, cobble a bill together forbidding any relative, by blood or marriage, from running for the presidency for at least 100 years after their relative served in that position. NO DYNASTIES! You could tie it to term limits as well.
1 posted on 10/21/2016 8:18:07 AM PDT by rktman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: rktman

2 posted on 10/21/2016 8:20:28 AM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

She’d more likely join The View.


3 posted on 10/21/2016 8:20:38 AM PDT by jimfree (In November 2016 my 16 y/o granddaughter will have more quality exec experience than Barack Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

So that means she will at some point.


4 posted on 10/21/2016 8:21:26 AM PDT by wastedyears (precious bodily fluids)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Michelle in 2024 to 2032, then it is Chelsea’s turn.


5 posted on 10/21/2016 8:21:52 AM PDT by buckalfa (I am deplorable.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimfree

Yes. She hasn’t seemed to like living in our White House.


6 posted on 10/21/2016 8:21:55 AM PDT by Jamestown1630 ("A Republic, If you can keep it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jimfree

Gaggle time. Cackling galore. She’s nearly as intelligent as most of the view crew. Such tolerance. Do they give nobel prizes for groups who further diversity and tolerance. /s


7 posted on 10/21/2016 8:22:31 AM PDT by rktman (Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Then we now know she is.


8 posted on 10/21/2016 8:23:01 AM PDT by ColdOne ((poochie... Tasha 2000~3/14/11~ Because you'd be in jail!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jamestown1630

Her butt will only get bigger.


9 posted on 10/21/2016 8:23:05 AM PDT by DIRTYSECRET (urope. Why do they put up with this.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: rktman
I think being POTUS would involve with her mooching too much. Being paid a large some of money for berating Americans will provide her the lifestyle she is accustomed to with a lot less work.


10 posted on 10/21/2016 8:25:26 AM PDT by Gamecock (Gun owner. Christian. Pro-American. Pro Law and Order. I am in the basket of deplorables.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Who asked him?


11 posted on 10/21/2016 8:25:33 AM PDT by McGruff (Time for a Tea Party II)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock
involve=interfere
12 posted on 10/21/2016 8:26:07 AM PDT by Gamecock (Gun owner. Christian. Pro-American. Pro Law and Order. I am in the basket of deplorables.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Democrats always say one thing then do the opposite.


13 posted on 10/21/2016 8:26:34 AM PDT by McGruff (Time for a Tea Party II)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Ya , she’s way too Crabby


14 posted on 10/21/2016 8:27:13 AM PDT by butlerweave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: buckalfa
then it is Chelsea’s turn.

Speaking of witch...

I was so pleased to see the little snowflake getting a crash course on her rapist father, and her murdering mother and traitor, during the second debate.

15 posted on 10/21/2016 8:27:52 AM PDT by ROCKLOBSTER (RATs, RINOs......same thing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: rktman

“the current First Lady wants a non-electoral life”
__________________

“non-electoral” is an unusual choice of words ...does that means she desires an lifetime appointed position??? Hmmm, maybe SCOTUS???


16 posted on 10/21/2016 8:28:39 AM PDT by Ozymandias Ghost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Translation: She will run. She just wants people to beg her to run.


17 posted on 10/21/2016 8:30:17 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ozymandias Ghost

Maybe if she leaves Barak and has nothing to do. Her hospital job was a no-show job and she wasn’t replaced.


18 posted on 10/21/2016 8:30:22 AM PDT by DIRTYSECRET (urope. Why do they put up with this.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Jamestown1630

She hasn’t seemed to like living in our White House.

I don’t know. She sure likes those designer clothes we buy for her and all those vacation and all those make up artists that make her look human. I don’t know if she wants to give all that up.


19 posted on 10/21/2016 8:34:13 AM PDT by Bitsy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Michelle O. knows good and well that if she wants to serve the country, she doesn’t really have to sweat it. The job, or a similar job will be hers, no problem. Either she will simply be appointed to a position, such as head of a committee or an ambassadorship, or the dems will ‘cook the votes’ for her.

Worse comes to worst and she has to outright run for a nomination “and stuff’, efforts will be made to elimmnate all true competitors. She will be running against a group of nobodies who have comparatively no money.
So, if I, a true ‘nobody’, can figure out how this system works, I know Michelle’s group can do the same if she so chooses. Oh, and then, there is always the chance that she does run fairly, and simply is not popular enough to sufficiently cheat and carve out a win. She may lose and lose big.


20 posted on 10/21/2016 8:34:49 AM PDT by lee martell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson