Posted on 10/21/2016 8:18:07 AM PDT by rktman
With Hillary Clinton reaching the end of a generation-long quest to return the Clintons to the White House successful or not some are pondering the First Lady-to-POTUS model in the future. With Michelle Obama hitting the hustings hard for Hillary*, that question obviously applies in the present tense. Dont worry, former Barack Obama campaign chief tells Hugh Hewitt this morning hed bet everything I own that the current First Lady wants a non-electoral life when Barack Obama retires in January:
(Excerpt) Read more at hotair.com ...
She’d more likely join The View.
So that means she will at some point.
Michelle in 2024 to 2032, then it is Chelsea’s turn.
Yes. She hasn’t seemed to like living in our White House.
Gaggle time. Cackling galore. She’s nearly as intelligent as most of the view crew. Such tolerance. Do they give nobel prizes for groups who further diversity and tolerance. /s
Then we now know she is.
Her butt will only get bigger.
Who asked him?
Democrats always say one thing then do the opposite.
Ya , she’s way too Crabby
Speaking of witch...
I was so pleased to see the little snowflake getting a crash course on her rapist father, and her murdering mother and traitor, during the second debate.
“the current First Lady wants a non-electoral life”
__________________
“non-electoral” is an unusual choice of words ...does that means she desires an lifetime appointed position??? Hmmm, maybe SCOTUS???
Translation: She will run. She just wants people to beg her to run.
Maybe if she leaves Barak and has nothing to do. Her hospital job was a no-show job and she wasn’t replaced.
She hasnt seemed to like living in our White House.
I don’t know. She sure likes those designer clothes we buy for her and all those vacation and all those make up artists that make her look human. I don’t know if she wants to give all that up.
Michelle O. knows good and well that if she wants to serve the country, she doesn’t really have to sweat it. The job, or a similar job will be hers, no problem. Either she will simply be appointed to a position, such as head of a committee or an ambassadorship, or the dems will ‘cook the votes’ for her.
Worse comes to worst and she has to outright run for a nomination “and stuff’, efforts will be made to elimmnate all true competitors. She will be running against a group of nobodies who have comparatively no money.
So, if I, a true ‘nobody’, can figure out how this system works, I know Michelle’s group can do the same if she so chooses. Oh, and then, there is always the chance that she does run fairly, and simply is not popular enough to sufficiently cheat and carve out a win. She may lose and lose big.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.