Posted on 10/19/2016 11:54:25 AM PDT by jazusamo
Full title: Judicial Watch: New Emails Show Hillary Clinton Contacts with Bryan Pagliano – Raise New Questions About Her Sworn Testimony
(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch today released new State Department documents, which were uncovered by the FBI in its investigation of Clinton and her use of the clintonemail.com system. The emails reveal direct communications between former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and her top IT specialist, Bryan Pagliano, about clintonemail.com management problems. Last week, Clinton claimed under oath to Judicial Watch that she “does not recall having communications” with Pagliano relating to the email system. Clinton’s emails to Pagliano, who installed and maintained the clintonemail.com computer system in the Clinton’s New York home, relate to email management problems with Clinton’s BlackBerry . The FBI recovered these new emails from those not turned over by Hillary Clinton. These new emails are government documents and not personal emails as Hillary Clinton claims in defending her decision to not turn over 30,000 emails sent or received by her as Secretary of State.
The new documents were among the nearly 15,000 Clinton emails discovered by the FBI, and obtained in response to an April 8, 2016, federal court order directing the Department of State to begin producing materials for Judicial Watch in response to a September 3, 2015 Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit (Judicial Watch, Inc. v. U.S. Department of State (No. 1:15-cv-01441)). The lawsuit was filed after State failed to comply with an August 5, 2015 FOIA request seeking information about Bryan Pagliano’s involvement with Clinton’s email system.
Several “Test” messages were sent between Pagliano, Clinton, and her then-Deputy Chief of Staff Jon Davidson on September 2, 2011. And on March 2012 Clinton writes to Pagliano, “Once again, I’m having BB [BlackBerry] trouble”:
From: H
Sent: Sunday, March 18, 2012 8:45 AM
To: Justin Cooper, Bryan Pagliano [Cooper was a senior advisor to Bill Clinton]
Cc: Oscar Floras [manager of Clinton’s New York home]
Subject: Help!
Once again, I’m having BB trouble. I am not receiving emails although people are getting ones I send but I get their replies on my IP. I’ve taken out the battery and done what I know to do but with no luck yet any ideas?
***
From: H
Sent: Sunday, March 18, 2012 8:54 AM
To: Justin Cooper
Cc: Bryan M. Pagliano, Oscar Flores
Subject: Re: Help!
Thanks, Justin. How does that happen. do I need to do anything?
***
From: Bryan Pagliano
Sent: Sunday, March 18, 2012 10:32 AM
To: H
Cc: Justin Cooper, Oscar Flores
Subject: Re: Help!
Let me take a look at the server to see if it offers any insight. iPhone is not much different from iPad, however in both cases the security landscape is different from the blackberry.
-Bryan
***
From: H hdr22@clintonemail.com
Sent: Sunday, March 18, 2012 11:44 AM
To: Justin Cooper
Cc: Bryan M. Pagliano, Oscar Flores
Subject: Re:
Thanks again. I’m back in business.
On October 13, 2016, Judicial Watch released Clinton’s responses given under oath to 25 questions posed by Judicial Watch as ordered by U.S. District Judge Emmet G. Sullivan in separate litigation. The final question reads:
Identify all communications between you and Brian Pagliano concerning or relating to the management, preservation, deletion, or destruction of any emails in your clintonemail.com email account, including any instruction or direction to Mr. Pagliano about the management, preservation, deletion, or destruction of emails in your account when transferring the clintonemail.com email system to any alternate or replacement server. For each communication, identify the time, date, place, manner (e.g., in person, in (e.g., in person, in writing, by telephone, or by electronic or other means), persons present or participating, and content of the communication.
Clinton’s response:
Secretary Clinton objects to Interrogatory No. 25 on the ground that it requests information that is outside the scope of permitted discovery for the reasons set forth in General Objection No. 5. Secretary Clinton further objects to Interrogatory No. 25 on the ground that the word “management” is vague. Secretary Clinton further objects to Interrogatory No. 25 insofar as it requests information related to alternate or replacement servers used after Secretary Clinton’s tenure as Secretary of State. Subject to and without waiving the foregoing objections, Secretary Clinton states that she does not recall having communications with Bryan Pagliano concerning or relating to the management, preservation, deletion, or destruction of any e-mails in her clintonemail.com email account. [Emphasis added]
Clinton also claimed she “ does not recall” 20 times in her responses given under oath.
In addition, Judicial Watch deposed Bryan Pagliano in June. He invoked his Fifth Amendment right not to incriminate himself more than 125 times, including:
Q. During your tenure at the State Department, did you communicate with Secretary Clinton by e-mail?
A. On the advice of counsel, I will decline to answer your question in reliance on my rights under the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution.
“These new emails leave little doubt that Hillary Clinton was less than forthright and misled the public when she wrote, under oath, that she ‘couldn’t recall’ communicating with Bryan Pagliano about her email scheme,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “No wonder Clinton and her agents deleted these emails time and time again. And these smoking gun emails would never have seen the light of day but for Judicial Watch’s federal lawsuits.”
PING
I have come to think she gets off on blatantly lying and then saying “Prove it”. It gives her a thrill to know that people know she is lying and she has been oh so clever deleting, hiding, working around the evidence. She even did it on her first case with that young girl who got raped - and then Hillary laughed about it.
Judicial Watch; doing what Congress is supposed to be doing.
Briefly and concisely explain each scandal, i.e., the Readers Digest condensed Version.
Overwhelm the LIV with a tidal wave of crimes.
putting aside her stautory felony criminal violations....
CONSPIRACY TO OBSTRUCT IS ANOTHER UNINDICTED CRIME FOR HILLARY AND HER MINIONS
that is what took Nixon down.... and ultimately will take the beast down...
40+ years she’s been in public ‘service’ in some form or another. And yet, nothing sticks. Nothing.
Simply amazing. She really IS some sort of Dr. Evil and has the goods on everyone!
Couldn’t agree more.
It totally blows me away that even Rats can support a person as corrupt and criminal as her.
Anyone who can prepare for a 90 minute performance from scripted material; and, hit all the cues, can’t possibly have such a poor memory.
I sure am happy that Judicial watch goes after Hillary like a pit bull with the persistence of the EverReady Bunny.
I’m sure they have a free rent section in her head.
Sadly, tbey have sold their souls for the illusion of power in this world.
The criminal unindicted b**ch is guilty beyond any reasonable or unreasonable doubt.
Why is it necessary to continue beating this dead horse?
No matter how much addition evidence emerges there is nothing left to beat!
Q. During your tenure at the State Department, did you communicate with Secretary Clinton by e-mail?
A. On the advice of counsel, I will decline to answer your question in reliance on my rights under the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution.
Thanks for the ping... more stuff the MSM will ignore...
More evidence for Trump to submit to the masses tonight. She can look like a kid with his hand in the cookie jar or she can say she had a fall and doesn’t remember a lot of things. All that will do is show the masses she’s not in physical shape to be President.
“I do not recall” is not a lie if it’s learned later that she DID know. She never said “Absolutely not.” I’m an expert at figuring out the Clintons’ doublespeak.
It's Pretty simple, really.
Hillary, early on in her life of crime, discovered by trial and error that like magic, if she lied convincingly no one would challenge her. Not because it wasn't obvious, but the minor bureaucratic mind takes the path of least resistance when too much work (and his job) might be involved.
As her power and "connections" grew, all she had to demand when challenged was, "Can you prove it?"
Power corrupts; Absolute Power corrupts absolutely...James Comey is whole other total puzzler... not being exactly a minor bureaucrat.
This is a different Bryan Pagliano - this one is her yoga instructor.
Right. “I do not recall” = plausible deniability.
I should mention that she's been around forever ... and the smoking gun - since HRC's email wasn't a .gov address and neither were ANY of her pay for play contacts all the important/criminal emails were deleted and then bleached. On purpose. IMHO.
"White House Counsel
After serving as Deputy General Counsel of the Clinton/Gore Transition Planning Foundation after Clinton's 1992 election, she served as Associate Counsel to the President in the White House[3] from 1993 on.[11] Until the impeachment, she was little known to the public.[12]
During the impeachment trial, the BBC reported that she was "widely regarded as the shining star of the defense team, and gave an effective presentation on President Clinton's behalf on the second day of defense arguments."[1] Other media outlets also viewed her work quite favorably.[13] Her presentation to the Senate focused on refuting the obstruction of justice charge and the House Managers' claim that failure to convict the President would damage the rule of law.[1] Her summation became known for its endorsement of Clinton's record with respect towards women and minorities;[2] she said, "I stand here before you today because President Bill Clinton believed I could stand here for him ... I'm not worried about civil rights, because this President's record on civil rights, on women's rights, on all of our rights is unimpeachable."[2][9]
After Clinton was acquitted, Mills was offered the White House Counsel position when Charles Ruff stepped down, but she declined.[2]" Source: Wiki: Cheryl Mills
It doesn’t matter
Unless Trump appoints a Special Prosecutor, this is all so much hot air
Nice find.....her nose is so far up the Clintons
butts, amazing she can breathe.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.