Posted on 10/15/2016 4:55:05 AM PDT by Jack Hydrazine
Shameful. And you wonder why there is a mens rights movement.
Harass that bitch until she returns the stolen money, apologizes, and gets sterilized.
Use lawyers...they’re poison. But in this case they’d be _our_ poison.
The laws state that a child born with in the marriage is the child of both parents, DNA results not withstanding. This is a law passed years before there would be ways to definitively track genetic heritage.
The laws may need to be changed, but this is what they are now.
As it sits the child is his because legally the child is his, not genetically.
Since forever, the offspring of a married couple are the husbands responsibility. She’s legally his daughter. He should pay.
Men used to strongly consider the character of the women they married. It’s more important than looks.
A really rotten woman in MANY ways. She’s screwing over the dad that her daughter grew up with and her daughter, too.
Even when the kid IS YOURS you can get screwed over: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D9scj-AC1RI
I would say the wonder is why more men don't support it, but I know why.
You stated: “Since forever, the offspring of a married couple are the husbands responsibility. Shes legally his daughter. He should pay.”
This ANCIENT LAW was accepted before there was a test that POSITIVELY PROVED who the father was. He was “poking” her before they got married while the whore was “poking” others. When she got pregnant he had the choice to marry her or pay child support for another dog’s puppy (unknown to him) for the next 18 years. What a Bitch!
As long as we don’t have a “MEN’S RIGHTS” movement this will go on forever.
“Men used to strongly consider the character of the women they married.”
That was a long, long, long time ago. People of my advanced age married for life and most marriages did so. Today it’s different. Check out the average length of marriages today.
BIG DIFFERENCE!
The courts have seen fit to interpret the obligations incurred in entering into marriage. They haven’t achieved a just balance in all cases. If one interprets marriage from the viewpoint of a legal instrument, obviously several clauses and expectations were explicitly violated by her conduct.
Fraud should still be held accountable, even when discovered long after the transgression occurred. Chris Atkins life is still being impacted—the biological father skated on obligations other courts would have tasked him with, if the mother of the child had been single.
She effectively wielded a technicality with the courts blessing to burden him with the consequences of a concealed default. Why are the courts not as interested in a just outcome for Chris, as they are in awarding a prize to Lori? In this type of case why wouldn’t an independent trustee be tasked to administer application of the fathers financial support for a child?
The fuss is primarily about the fact that he wants visitation with the girl, who is now 15 years old. Then we have This:
When asked if she was taking advantage of the situation, Lonnquist responded, Maybe so, but that's also not on me. My kid doesn't want to see him. She wants nothing to do with him.
Could it be that she's been properly poisoned about him now?
Women bearing other men’s children isn’t new. Men not supporting their own children isn’t new. This man was probrably fornicating with this woman before marriage. If he was he knew what she was before he married her. Once he did, her children are his.
The mother should be in jail for criminal fraud.
Wonder if Danny Clinton Williams can file a case with this judge?
It won’t be long before some fool comes along this thread and says that it’s perfectly appropriate for this to occur “for the child”.
You advvocate3 for the enslavement of this man...why?
Since genetics is ignored, what about the financial responsibility for the children following a divorced woman in a new marriage she may engage in.?
New husband takes over the responsibility.
Stories like this are why I never married, terrible deal for the man in a ‘no fault’ arrangement.
I got snipped 15 years ago when I decided I did not need to reproduce.
Always entertaining to observe a womans reaction when I told them I had had the surgery, and educational.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.