back in 92 a man here paying child support for a kid that wasn't his walked into the social services office and murdered the four women in the support/collection department then committed suicide this too could end badly
Shameful. And you wonder why there is a mens rights movement.
Harass that bitch until she returns the stolen money, apologizes, and gets sterilized.
Use lawyers...they’re poison. But in this case they’d be _our_ poison.
Since forever, the offspring of a married couple are the husbands responsibility. She’s legally his daughter. He should pay.
Men used to strongly consider the character of the women they married. It’s more important than looks.
A really rotten woman in MANY ways. She’s screwing over the dad that her daughter grew up with and her daughter, too.
Even when the kid IS YOURS you can get screwed over: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D9scj-AC1RI
The courts have seen fit to interpret the obligations incurred in entering into marriage. They haven’t achieved a just balance in all cases. If one interprets marriage from the viewpoint of a legal instrument, obviously several clauses and expectations were explicitly violated by her conduct.
Fraud should still be held accountable, even when discovered long after the transgression occurred. Chris Atkins life is still being impacted—the biological father skated on obligations other courts would have tasked him with, if the mother of the child had been single.
She effectively wielded a technicality with the courts blessing to burden him with the consequences of a concealed default. Why are the courts not as interested in a just outcome for Chris, as they are in awarding a prize to Lori? In this type of case why wouldn’t an independent trustee be tasked to administer application of the fathers financial support for a child?
The fuss is primarily about the fact that he wants visitation with the girl, who is now 15 years old. Then we have This:
When asked if she was taking advantage of the situation, Lonnquist responded, “Maybe so, but that's also not on me. My kid doesn't want to see him. She wants nothing to do with him.”
Could it be that she's been properly poisoned about him now?
Wonder if Danny Clinton Williams can file a case with this judge?
It won’t be long before some fool comes along this thread and says that it’s perfectly appropriate for this to occur “for the child”.
It would appear that Chris Atkins, the legal father, has sufficient grounds to sue the biological father, Logan Doolen, for the amount of child support. Is there a reason that he can’t?
I had a great employee who didnt show up one day and was never heard from again. He went to ground to avoid paying support for 3 kids that were not his.
Marries a woman who has a kid because she says she is pregnant by him. Kid is born and wife talks him into adopting her first child. His second child by her comes along under suspicious circumstances but he doesn’t do anything until after the child is born. He sneaks a DNA test disproving his paternity. At the divorce trial she admits the other one she birthed while married isn’t his either. Judge tells him tough luck, legally they are yours.
He says he hasn’t seen the girl in 4 years. So how did he get a DNA test done? How did he get a DNA sample from the child? Wouldn’t a DNA sample from her be necessary to prove paternity?
Of course if he has been denied contact with the child and a DNA test proves that he isn’t the father, then no, he shouldn’t be required to pay child support going forward and should be IMO due a refund going back the 4 years he was denied visitation, if that is indeed true.
But then on the other hand, the mother remarried and asked for Atkins’ permission to change the child’s last name and he refused. If her new husband is able to provide support and is willing to adopt her, then I would think that would get Atkins off the hook for child support – would it not?
I understand if he still feels and wants to be the child’s father since he believed himself to be so for 11 years, but it sounds to me like he is perhaps also being a bit of an obstacle to this end.
Sad - especially for this 15-year-old girl caught in the middle of this legal and emotional mess and tug of war.
Imagine how messed up she must feel – the dad I knew as my dad for 11 years isn’t really my dad and I’m either not allowed to see him or my mother has poisoned me to the point I no longer want to, or maybe, perhaps I have legitimate reasons why I don’t want him in my life; my new dad isn’t allowed to give me his name and my biologic father who I never knew, suddenly comes into my life but doesn’t have to take any financial responsibility for me.
back in 92 a man here paying child support for a kid that wasn't his walked into the social services office and murdered the four women in the support/collection department then committed suicide this too could end badly
He should sue the real father for recompense
Dna tests should be required at birth, or before. That would help put a stop to this crap.
A good friend of mine had to pay support for a kid that wasn’t his as well. He had been separated from his wife for 5 years and she called him to finalize the divorce because she wanted to marry another man. So both parties show up for court as well as the future husband and all their attorneys. The judge looks up and notices that the woman is pregnant and said that changes everything, even though all parties and thier attorneys spoke up that the child was not his. This was in Idaho about 30 years ago
“And the biological father has been found “
And the poor guy paying child support for a child not his, he should sue the DNA father.