Posted on 10/14/2016 1:18:00 AM PDT by Mr. Mojo
Although the U.S. Justice Department didn't end up pursuing criminal charges against Hillary Clinton, she's still having to answer questions about her private email server. And it's not just on the campaign trail it's in court.
Clinton's attorneys submitted on her behalf answers to 23 of the 25 questions posed to her by Judicial Watch as part of its Freedom of Information Act lawsuit against Clinton. Judicial Watch is a "conservative, non-partisan" watchdog organization.
She signed and submitted her answers under penalty of perjury on Monday.
And Thursday, Judicial Watch released Clinton's responses.
Many of the responses included the phrase: "does not recall." Based on Newsy's count, the phrase was used 20 times in her answers.
Clinton said she didn't recall ever discussing or being told the use of a private email for State Department business "conflicted with or violated federal recordkeeping laws." She also said she didn't recall any reasons other than convenience for using her private email account for State Department business.
(Excerpt) Read more at aol.com ...
someone please answer a question for an amatuer- the way the article reads the questions were asked to her by Judicial Watch. Why is she under any obligation to answer questions posed by Judicial watch?
Trump would appoint a new AG. She can’t be pardoned before she’s convicted and she won’t be convicted before January.
Even “they” don’t really like or trust her; but the
Dhimmicrat worship among these people is viral and also
genetic, like DIARRHEA it runs in the jeans.
I THOUGHT THE PROPER RESPONSE WAS
pleading the 5TH
so the next step in dealing iwth amnesia is to PRESENT THE FACTS
and then ask if that refreshes your memory....
ask if they dispute the facst and specifically how... or what or when... etc...
PUT EM IN A BOX..
BUT AS THE SATANIC WITCH AHS SAID.... what difference does it make.
because loretta lynch/comey are NOT GOING TO PROSECUTE
so
congress should get off its fat lazy good for nothing ass and appoint an independent prosecutor based on testimony provided in fornt of various congressional committeed..
bundle it into one massive indictment and proceed ....
but the POS’s are lazy or bought off or both...
THEY ALL SHOUDL BE FIRED..
USELESS
ABSOLUTELY USELESS
and not just with reagrd to the Clintons....
allowing Obama to abuse executive pwoer, unrestrained...
use the LAW to reign him in....
if not we are being misled into a confrontation wiht both CHINA AND RUSSIA....
and that is real serious... and avoidable
of course she can be pardoned before conviction or even being charged-see nixon
they fail to ask her when she says i don't remember
THEN IT COULD HAVE HAPPENED RIGHT???
as did you kill chris stevens
i don't remember
BUT YOU COULD HAVE, RIGHT???
make the b!tch go on record as saying yes or no so she can be charged later with perjury
She can be pardoned at any time for any and all crimes. She does not need to be charged or convicted of anything.
nope most of the media still running 24 hours how some women who have no facts have come forward after 10 to 30 years ago about groping.
The media are so entrenched in their propaganda that they refuse to cover anything Clinton, unless it is a positive.
I honestly believe that they can’t see their bias due to their circle of friends and work associates who are like minded.
Sooo,
The “smartest woman in the world”, is in reality stoopid as can be?
Can’t remember what she had for breakfast.
Bullshit. The Fifth Amendment protects a right to be silent, not a right to lie under oath repeated and egregiously.
Link to Judicial Watch article:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3480307/posts
Killary, or rather her lawyers, answered these questions in the manner expected: deny, delay, obfuscate.
Nothing new here. Nothing expected either.
Elect Trump/Pence! Put an end to the Clinton Crime Machine.
Hasn’t this been this woman’s excuse for 40 years??
Maybe she is the smartest woman on Earth?? Who knew that you can make yourself a multi-millionaire by saying. “I do not recall...”
How many of those “I don’t recalls” were captured on video? It’d be amusing and effective to do a video mix over rap music with those. What rap song would be most appropriate? Gold Digger?
When one cannot keep their lies straight, it is time to “not recall”.
If her lawyers provide answers she can’t be held responsible for perjury.
“of course she can be pardoned before conviction or even being charged-see nixon”
Which would be an admission of guilt. Of course that probably doesn’t matter anymore. The dumwits would vote her no matter what as long as they get a little something something in return.
Exactly. A pardon needs to be accepted, and acceptance is an admission of guilt. Nixon tried to avoid an admission of guilt while accepting Ford's pardon, but Ford's reps explained they would have to walk away and leave Nixon to the legal system. Nixon, of course, surrendered on the point.
In case anyone has forgotten: Hillary was part of the Watergate team that argued that “I don’t recall” may constitute perjury under certain circumstances.
At any rate, what with all the DNC types having such bad memories one must wonder how they ever plan to write their memoirs?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.