Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CFPB “Structurally Unconstitutional” – US Court of Appeals
National Review ^ | October 11, 2016 3:47 PM | by IAIN MURRAY

Posted on 10/11/2016 1:28:48 PM PDT by Behind Liberal Lines

the US Court of Appeals from the DC Circuit today found that the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau was “structurally unconstitutional.”

The offending structure consists of an independent agency with a single, all-powerful executive director. The Court found that structure fell between two stools – an agency with a single head needs to be accountable to the President, while an independent agency needs to have internal checks and balances by having a multi-member commission format like the SEC and others...

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s lack of checks and balances violates the Constitution’s separation of powers. Its director is like a czar. He is not accountable to anyone, and can’t be fired even if voters elect a president with different ideas about how to protect consumers...

the Bureau not only overstepped its powers, it breached due process, and ignored the statute of limitations....

(Excerpt) Read more at nationalreview.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Editorial; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bureau; cfpb; cfpbunconstitutional; consumer; financial; obamalawless; protection; unconstitutional

1 posted on 10/11/2016 1:28:48 PM PDT by Behind Liberal Lines
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

this is potentially huge folks. Stay tuned.


2 posted on 10/11/2016 1:32:30 PM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

NR took time out from trashing Trump ?

Must be a slow day.


3 posted on 10/11/2016 1:33:40 PM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (My Batting Average( 1,000) since Nov 2014 (GOPe is that easy to read))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

Does this mean I can get my 6-percent credit card interest rate back?


4 posted on 10/11/2016 2:04:56 PM PDT by FoxInSocks ("Hope is not a course of action." -- M. O'Neal, USMC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

Damn — I hope the CFPB hangs around for another couple of months. I’m planning to file a CFPB complaint against a lawyer in a phony foreclosure case involving a family member. LOL.


5 posted on 10/11/2016 2:12:18 PM PDT by Alberta's Child ("Go ahead, bite the Big Apple ... don't mind the maggots.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego

Better than nothing, I suppose.

Still seems excessive power to reside in the executive branch.


6 posted on 10/11/2016 2:12:45 PM PDT by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

“But Congress also has a role to play.”

BWAHAHAHA!


7 posted on 10/11/2016 2:23:24 PM PDT by dljordan (WhoVoltaire: "To find out who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

Amen.


8 posted on 10/11/2016 2:26:43 PM PDT by major-pelham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

So it is not constitutional because Obama can control it.


9 posted on 10/11/2016 2:36:32 PM PDT by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Revel

I meant “Can’t” not “Can”.


10 posted on 10/11/2016 2:50:59 PM PDT by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines; All
Let’s say that the post-17th Amendment ratificaton CFPB is a great idea. The major constitutional problem with the CFPB is that it remains that the states have never delegated to the feds, expressly via the Constitution, the specific power to establish such an agency, or to make the Dodd-Frank Act that created it imo. Corrections, insights welcome.

Note that CFPB and Dodd-Frank are examples, imo, of the small encroachment of state powers that James Madison and Thomas Jefferson had warned patriots to be on their guard against.

Remember in November !

Patriots need to support Trump / Pence by also electing a new, state sovereignty-respecting Congress that will not only work within its constitutional Article I, Section 8-limited powers to support Trump’s vision for making America great again for everybody, but will also put a stop to unconstitutonal federal taxes and likewise unconstitutional inteference in state affairs as evidenced by CFPB and the constitutionally indefensible (imo) Dodd-Frank law.

Note that such a Congress will also probably be willing to fire state sovereignty-ignoring activist justices.

11 posted on 10/11/2016 3:43:30 PM PDT by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Agree. To correct an unconstitutionally structured agency, the court unconstitutionally ordered its restructuring. Rather than be rid of the CFPB, and let congress decide whether or not to resurrect an unconstitutional corpse, scotus kept it alive. This isn’t free government.


12 posted on 10/11/2016 3:57:03 PM PDT by Jacquerie (ArticleVBlog.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson