Skip to comments.
SHAME! Juanita Broaddrick and Paula Jones SLAM Joy Behar for calling them tramps
http://twitchy.com ^
 | 10/11/2016
 | sam J.
Posted on 10/11/2016 8:17:04 AM PDT by Beowulf9
Remember when Hillary Clinton said something about how all women who are sexually assaulted should be heard? Or something along those lines, its hard to keep it all straight considering how much nonsense she spews but it was something like that. Apparently the Left only agrees with her when women who are Democrats want to talk about being sexually assaulted, otherwise theyre just tramps.
(Excerpt) Read more at twitchy.com ...
TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: behar; broderick; clinton; liberalmedia; rape
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
 first 1-20, 21-23 next  last
1
posted on 
10/11/2016 8:17:04 AM PDT
by 
Beowulf9
 
To: Beowulf9
    It’s all politics now.
Global warming, abortion, rape, sex, bathrooms... all politics.
Did our side do this?
 
2
posted on 
10/11/2016 8:19:02 AM PDT
by 
Steely Tom
(Vote GOP: A Slower Handbasket)
 
To: Beowulf9
    The liberal view: If one isn’t of her political persuasion, one is not really human and should very well be done away with.
 
3
posted on 
10/11/2016 8:20:05 AM PDT
by 
ArtDodger
 
To: Beowulf9
    Halloween is getting close so they’ve brought out Joy Behar with her huge head to frighten children.
 
4
posted on 
10/11/2016 8:20:30 AM PDT
by 
blueunicorn6
("A crack shot and a good dancer")
 
To: Beowulf9
    Then Joy is “Hillary’s Whore”
 
5
posted on 
10/11/2016 8:22:27 AM PDT
by 
Darteaus94025
(Can't have a Liberal without a Lie)
 
To: Beowulf9
    As a political maneuver, this is brilliant and classic Trump. He addresses the big issues and let's his surrogates do the nasty close quarters mudslinging for him.
 
 Perfect example. Here we have two sympathetic individuals, wrong by the democrat presidential nominee, who are difficult to attack in the media. The media can attack them, but the media damages itself by doing so.
 
 It's a political landmine and the MSM is stomping all over it.
6
posted on 
10/11/2016 8:23:21 AM PDT
by 
JamesP81
 
To: Beowulf9
    An executive propositions a low level employee in the most vulgar manner imaginable.
That’s what happened to Paula Jones and Hillary set out to destroy her reputation.
 
7
posted on 
10/11/2016 8:33:38 AM PDT
by 
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
 
To: BenLurkin
8
posted on 
10/11/2016 8:38:38 AM PDT
by 
DIRTYSECRET
(urope. Why do they put up with this.)
 
To: Steely Tom
    I feel our side is complicit in some way. This march to madness has taken multiple generations.
Maybe most of us were to comfy to try and stop this.
 
9
posted on 
10/11/2016 8:38:52 AM PDT
by 
Jay Thomas
(If not for my faith in Christ, I would despair.)
 
To: Jay Thomas
    True, but we are awake now. We try to awaken others but many of them resist. They call us names and continue to talk about the Kardashians.
 
10
posted on 
10/11/2016 8:40:23 AM PDT
by 
uncitizen
(JFK: The first victim of the New World Order)
 
To: Beowulf9
11
posted on 
10/11/2016 8:42:02 AM PDT
by 
Fiddlstix
(Warning! This Is A Subliminal Tagline! Read it at your own risk!(Presented by TagLines R US))
 
To: Steely Tom
    that’s because the Left have no relationship with God, therefore their politics is their religion.
 
To: Beowulf9
    Paula Jones should not be part of this. She was not sexually assaulted as Broderrick and Willey were, or raped and attacked as the Kathy woman was
 
To: ArtDodger
    The liberal view: If one isnt of her political persuasion, one is not really human and should very well be done away with. And if you're not a DemocRAT, you're just supposed to bend over and take it. Right, Mitt? 
 
 
14
posted on 
10/11/2016 8:45:09 AM PDT
by 
COBOL2Java
(Hillary's screeching voice is like the pipe organs of hell)
 
To: Beowulf9
    Kelly on Fox last night showed a video of Trump supporting B.J. Clinton during the women eruptions. He said of them that they were unattractive and other adjectives. That was in the 90s when he was A Democrat ( I guess), also, supported Tyson up on rape charges.. Anyway, his spoke person said that was before he learned the truth from the women and met personally with them. Said that he supports right to life now, too. Kelly said that Broderick denied ever being raped when she was interviewed by the FBI.
 I saw the tape. He apparently was a typical Clinton supporter at the time. A lot of people defended Clinton. As for Broderick, I did not know that she was on record denying the rape. That is too bad. I just took a deep breath and said that that was then when he was A Democrat. I hope the women forgave him. Also, wonder if the video of him talking badly about the women will make the rounds. Kelly was puffed up showing it.
15
posted on 
10/11/2016 8:45:33 AM PDT
by 
Bronzy
(America needs Trump to stop the insider gravy train. No insiders)
 
To: Steely Tom
    >
Its all politics now.
Global warming, abortion, rape, sex, bathrooms... all politics.
Did our side do this?
>
A: Yes. Evil to prevail and all that....
 
16
posted on 
10/11/2016 8:47:19 AM PDT
by 
i_robot73
("A man chooses. A slave obeys." - Andrew Ryan)
 
To: montag813
    Respectfully, you could not be more wrong: In 2016 America, the Left have “dumbed-down” rape to mean just about anything...Besides, after the way she was savaged by the Media she needs to be heard.
 
To: Beowulf9
18
posted on 
10/11/2016 8:48:08 AM PDT
by 
SteveH
 
To: Beowulf9
    "Apparently the Left only agrees with her when women who are Democrats want to talk about being sexually assaulted, otherwise theyre just tramps."
 
 Actually, I think most of Clinton's victims WERE Democrats at the time, which was why they came into contact with him in the first place.
19
posted on 
10/11/2016 8:56:51 AM PDT
by 
Steve_Seattle
("Above all, shake your bum at Burton.")
 
To: Beowulf9
    Look the Left would have already moved this into courts by suing for slander and conjuring up some strange interpretation of a civil rights violation. We need to do stuff just like that! Yes it costs money but it could be crowd funded or some conservative benefactor could kick in.
Why do this? Primarily to generate the negative Clinton publicity! You will likely lose in the courts (Doubt if they would even hear it!) But again think “theater”, drama for the “low infos”, first impressions often sets their view! It’s likely the only way you can keep the issue alive with the MSM desperately trying to ignore it.
 
20
posted on 
10/11/2016 8:59:43 AM PDT
by 
Reily
 
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
 first 1-20, 21-23 next  last
    Disclaimer:
    Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
    posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
    management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
    exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson