Posted on 10/08/2016 11:16:03 PM PDT by detective
Leaked emails from Hillary Clinton campaign manager John Podesta’s personal email account published by WikiLeaks reveal the Clinton campaign’s coordination with George Soros’s Open Society Foundations on the subject of police reform.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailycaller.com ...
I always did think Soros was in bed with the Clintons, so this is no surprise to me. I wish the nasty old goat would just die and put us out of our misery. Soros, too. ;o]
100%
Soros is a US Citizen I believe.
Donald has got to get this out to all Americans...
TOTALLY AGREE. IT’S TIME TO GET REAL AND QUIT PU**Y-FOOTING AROUND.
"There’s a Yuuuge difference between 10 year old locker room talk and a 30+ year streak of criminal activity. Hillary for prison!"
The email is forwarding a translation of an opinion piece by Israeli writer David Grossman, from an Israeli publication, Haaretz.
Instead of the real issues facing our nation. The world is on the ledge, facing war, economies on the brink of collapse or have collapsed and were talking about “guy talk”.
Blood is in the water folks. Trump better do some serious damage control this evening or Hillary is going to pile on him in a big way.
If Trump was smart, he'd chronicle the decades of Clinton scandals from Rose law firm to whitewater to filegate, travelgate, Bill/Hillary's abuse of woman, servergate, foundationgate....all of’em...tonight.
Show the American people who the real shysters are. Chronicle the scandals.
George Schwartz made his first billion crashing the Euro. He salivates thinking he can make a trillion from crashing the dollar. He needs to “not be here any more”
Hillary Clinton and George Soros are a blight upon America and a disgrace to humanity.
George Soros is also funding Sheriff Joe Apaio’s opponent .
But...but...THOSE EVIL KOCH BROTHERS! Aarrgghhhh!!
*Liberal Heads Explode*
How I HATE the world we’re living in these days. WHY is EVIL winning?
(Never mind. I KNOW why!)
Soros is a US Citizen I believe.Is it not illegal for candidates to take money from non US citizens? - Fai Mao
IIRC you are correct. The glaring issue is that Democrats were unanimous, or close to it, behind McCain-Feingold and any and all unconstitutional restrictions (“reform”) on the exercise of free political press. And “the press” was behind it too - at least, the associated press cabal.Theoretically the Federal Election Commission will now come down on Soros and like a ton of bricks Hillary for conspiring to evade “Campaign Finance Reform.” (All right, no snickering in class!)
The scare quotes around “the press” are justified by the fact that, under 1A, everyone has freedom of the press. Jim Robinson exercises freedom of the press by hosting FR on his server; you could do the same (using your own (e.g. licensed) software and server (and your own unique name). Posters to FR don’t exercise freedom of the press by posting here; JimRob can take down any post he doesn’t want on FR without explaining it to any legal authority. The way he exercises that authority is what gives FR its distinct character. And attracts, or does not attract, particular people.
Anyway, we are currently outraged over “the media” bashing Trump and ignoring the issues. Any individual newspaper has a perfect right to do that; the scandal is that all newspapers, and nearly all broadcast journalism, does exactly the same thing. And would do, for any Republican. The intent of the First Amendment is that there will be open competition among promoters of opinion. Not objectivity (implying homogeneity) among them.
Time was, when the former was the norm, now the latter is. It took me a lot longer than I like to admit to myself to figure out a rationale for the difference. What made the difference was the telegraph. The telegraph, and the Associated Press. The telegraph made the kind of newspaper we take for granted - with news from all over the world - possible. But expensive. The AP conserves scarce, expensive bandwidth in the distribution of the news nationwide. The AP and its membership of newspapers (etc) constitute a monopoly; SCOTUS so ruled in 1945. But the AP did not violate the Antitrust act when it was created, because that happened in the 1840s, and Sherman only dates back to 1890.
Even when SCOTUS ruled against the AP (in 1945) it did not break the AP up; its mission was deemed critical and it was “too big to fail.” That was then, it is now seven decades later. Above I styled telegraphy bandwidth “scarce and expensive.” In the Internet age, it is dirt cheap. An honest SCOTUS - which if Hillary wins I will never see again in my lifetime - would declare the AP a blatant violation of Sherman. An honest SCOTUS would declare “Campaign Finance Reform” - and all its works, including the FEC - an abomination and a blatant violation of 1A. An honest SCOTUS would declare the FCC - federal regulation of communication - to be likewise anachronistic. We should be able to “broadcast” via cell phone; the government should have no authority to shut down a Rush Limbaugh by threatening members of his network with loss of license.
</rant>
She says this successful businessman is "dangerous" and "unfit":
Of course they will publish it...
...in the same edition where the weather forecast for Hell is blizzard conditions.
It shouldn't surprise you. I don't know how many times I've posted this...
John McCain funded by Soros since 2001
McCain/Soros by Rabbi Areyh Spero
McCain-Soros Toppled GOP Candidates Nov. 21, 2006
Soros' "Reform" (an article about Soros‘ instrumental hand in McCain/Feingold)
John McCain: George Soros' Useful Idiot?
Through The Weeds; John McCain, George Soros and the Reform Institute
Inside McCain's Reform Institute
McCain’s Reform Institute donor list: (From the WayBackMachine. RI removed it in 2006)
Lining the Pockets of McCain’s Reform Institute
Reform Institute greatfully acknowleges Sen. McCain as past Chairman:
(page has been scrubbed)
But his wife was offended. He’ll be sleeping on the couch. Anyone who has to sleep on the couch doesn’t have the temperament to lay a supermodel for a week or two./s
Noblesse oblige. The Clintons make their own rules.
The real problem is that we allow those who become citizens to keep any others that they may have.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.