Bill Clinton rape accuser Juanita Broaddrick is weighing in on Donald Trump’s controversial comments from 2005 that are mysteriously resurfacing just hours before the second debate and weeks before the general election.
“How many times must it be said,” she tweeted Saturday morning.
“Actions speak louder than words. (Donald Trump) said bad things! (Hillary Clinton) threatened me after (Bill Clinton) raped me.”
How many times must it be said? Actions speak louder than words. DT said bad things!HRC threatened me after BC raped me.
— Juanita Broaddrick (@atensnut) October 8, 2016
http://www.theamericanmirror.com/broaddrick-hillarys-actions-speak-louder-trumps-words/
America is far too important for us to allow ourselves to be side-tracked & lose focus. I suspect that there are very few people, here or elsewhere, who would think it acceptable to have every private conversation on any subject to be recorded and used against them, eleven years later.
Contrast this mass feeding frenzy in the media, with the handling of Hillary items--not eleven years old, but directly related to her present campaign!
We need such principles-based opinions expressed over and over on forums such as this and others.
Progressives want to focus on issues.
Liberty lovers must focus on the principles and ideas which can restore freedom, opportunity, prosperity and hope to rising generations of Americans and the world.
What is the state law regarding recording someone without their knowledge
where this happened? Just curious.
In the scene of this nation's political history, what Trump said 11 years ago, about something that took place longer ago than that, is a big fat NOTHING!
Jefferson called Adams an Hermaphrodite and much worse.
Burr called EVERYONE, including Washington, terrible things and killed Hamilton on purpose, whilst Hamilton shot into the air, like a gentleman.
The Whigs went after Jackson and his wife so badly, that Andy blamed the entire party for his wife's untimely death!
There's so much more, but lets skip forward to more modern times...the 1950s. The Dems started a vile "WHISPERING CAMPAIGN" that Mamie Eisenhower was a "closet drunk" AND WORSE...A FALLING DOWN ONE and a CUCKHOLD.
Most people, now, have less than NO idea what was done to Mr. Nixon, FOR MANY DECADES, nor why he was labeled "tricky Dick" by them, or even what the context of "I AM NOT A CROOK" was, yet they throw it all out there, STUPIDLY !
The "Tricky Dick" thing was in reference to a flyer printed on PINK paper ( in reference to Helen Gahagen Douglas being a PINKO ! ) when he ran for the Senate and won.
The "I AM NOT A CROOK", was said in the 'CHECKERS SPEECH" which everyone needs to look up!
Nixon was driven to paranoia and chased out of office for NOTHING but revenge from the left!
Hopefully, everyone here knows how Reagan was treated and forward.
BTTT
That was a clear misuse of the son's sacrifice, however you slice it. It reminded me of the morally disgraceful way that Sarah Brady paraded her brain damaged husband around America as a prop for anti-Second Amendment activities.
But let me confess to a weakness. My every instinct is to revile the sanctimonious twit--and how else can one describe those posturing pseudo intellectual twits, who today pretend that remarks Donald Trump made 11 or more years ago--never intended for publication--only indulging a sexual fantasy--were in any sense even 1/1000 as important as the life or death issues of the American Republic in 2016!
Anyone who is too prissy to put America ahead of this posturing sanctimony, deserves the contempt of all rational men & women! Who here, or anywhere in American political discourse--and in an era where every form of vulgarity (but with the approved slang rather than the unapproved slang) is used on TV and radio to market all sorts of health & hygiene products;--who in such an era will dare insult our intelligence by suggesting that their feigned sanctimonious horror can ever out weigh the question of who goes on the Supreme Court; or the question of how we deal with mass migrations by people who do not share our values into our lands; or the question of our military needs; or the question of whether we back or target those in law enforcement, etc. All matters in the crucible of here and no, and absolutely vital as public questions, essential for public attention!
How dare these twits endanger an American future with their ludicrous posturing! Will anyone suggest that their behavior is actually defensible?
2. Without wasting effort by trying to name the most contemptible Trump detractor--or diverting attention from the issues crucial to the very survival of America--we need to put into juxtaposition, the insane narrative of the prissy poseurs, as a class, with the issues that are crucial to any American future. Can anyone, that is any rational person, suggest that Donald Trump's mistake in letting a recounting of a sexual fantasy, eleven years ago, be recorded, is 1/100,000th as important as any of a half dozen issues, where he is for America & Hillary Clinton is not.
3. Again, not getting into wasting time, or building a specific barrier against any sanctimonious twit returning to the cause, as a reformed prodigal; we must organize discussions that compare priorities. The more that we focus on what is really important, the stupider & less principled the twits will sound--and the more certain their comeuppance on November 8th.
Damn the pseudo intellectual poseurs--for that is what they truly are;--Damn the liars & Damn the lies. Trump to the White House!
God Bless & sustain Donald Trump in this ordeal, which he has undertaken because he loves America! Let us redouble our efforts to the end that his vision, not that of the poseurs, hypocrites and liars, prevails.
Imagine what would have been the reaction, if, when the original Horatio stepped on to the bridge to defend his civilization, there had been a msss media to stab him in the back? Donald Trump is all in for us. We dare not let the dishonest, pseudo intellectual poseurs of the mass media destroy our brave warrior risking his all for us and an American Future!
How can any American support a woman, running for President, who openly refuses to respect the specific purpose of the Constitution, she has repeatedly sworn to preserve:
The Preamble to the Constitution states that purpose:
We the people of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.
Our posterity, of course, are our lineal descendants. The stated purpose is 100% consistent with Donald Trump's call to put America First. It is 100% consistent with the Fifth Commandment, and traditional Western values, in general. Mrs. Clinton's call for open borders, and the failure to properly vet immigrants from lands with very different value systems, is 100% inconsistent with the Constitution.
How can any American refuse to vote for Donald Trump, who not only understands what the Constitution requires. He also strenuously opposes Mrs. Clinton! Trump is willing to risk a lifetime of success--his whole career & fortune--to take on a corrupt media, that tries in every unfair, intellectually dishonest way, to cover up Mrs. Clinton's crimes and repeated acts of betrayal, in order to stand for us, our Constitution and our obvious interests, on a host of vital issues.
These include:
1. Trump supports and has been endorsed by the border guards. Mrs. Clinton has shown only disdain for those trying to keep America safe from a flood of unauthorized invaders.
2. Trump supports the rights of Americans to efficiently arm themselves, both for their own protection and for the protection of America! Mrs. Clinton has repeatedly sought means to disarm American families.
3. Trump has supported the local Police in the violent confrontations with neighborhood thugs, while Mrs. Clinton & Obama have allied themselves with virulently anti Police groups--some funded by George Soros--who seem determined to deny the law abiding people in the involved neighborhoods, the necessary Police protection, to make those neighborhoods safe.
4. Trump understands that making poor neighborhoods much safer, is the key to increasing constructive activity in such neighborhoods--or any neighborhood;--the key to people being able to start local businesses, with some hope of success; the key to better job opportunities, better credit ratings, etc. Mrs. Clinton seems more intent on encouraging and approving those Soros funded groups.
5. Donald Trump supports American energy production in all forms; wants to let the coal miners get back to work; to take advantage of improved technology that allows a cleaner use of coal. Mrs. Clinton has insulted to coal miners, by refusing to help them get back to work, while she patronizes them, offering them a new dependence on even more Government meddling.
6. To return to the Constitution--the solemn compact or contract that authorizes us to even have a Federal Government;--the charter, that once--when truly honored--made us the envy of the earth:
Donald Trump has pledged to appoint only those who honor the clear intent of that compact, to the Federal Judiciary. Mrs. Clinton has promised to only appoint Judges who agree with her ghoulish view of Feminist issues, such as the idea that it is acceptable for a woman on mere whim to have an otherwise healthy baby, already half out of her body, killed in cold blood, in something euphemistically labeled a "partial birth abortion."
7. Donald Trump has addressed great rallies every day, discussing these and other vital issues; such as the damage to American workers & communities, resulting from trade deals, and immigration policies, that do not protect our rooted population. Mrs. Clinton has generally avoided any in depth discussion of issues; preferring, instead, an incessant attack on Donald Trump's personality; his tone; his supporters;--in each case always misrepresenting the same by a combination of lies, cherry picking misleading data, gross exaggerations, and citations of spurious media smears, engineered by a slavish press, which also covers up her actual crimes, in their blind but determined support.
Under such circumstances: How can any American vote for Mrs. Clinton? How can any American refuse to vote for Donald Trump?
An excellent read! Also property rights and agenda 21, and even war with Russia and China should be considered.
When I was in Russia in the 90’s it was at first like a 3rd world country in many ways. Yet the average ten year old spoke perfect English and was working on a 3rd language. Russia and China will beat us without Iran helping them.
A Hillary election is the end as we know it.
I do not want to come across as arrogant; but based on 60+ years of fighting for traditional American values, including hours of using live TV to advantage, I want to share some experience driven suggestions, both for our candidate, and all of us who will be actively promoting a Trump victory in just 20 days.
While speaking in anger can sometimes help rally those who share your beliefs and priorities, it is not the most effective way to convert those who dissent from our purpose. When there is a real problem to be addressed, it is almost always better to speak in sorrow than in anger.
In the present ideological conflict, there is great reason for sorrow. We need to interject, in every possible exchange, those contemporary phenomena that are not only unfortunate from our stand point; but which are likely to be understood as sad by anyone listening to us.
Putting this understanding to work in a situation such as tonight's Presidential debate; Trump needs to intertwine his response to essential policy issues, by sadly lamenting the background social climate, which certainly impacts all aspects of contemporary American life, including the problem reflected in the issue. For example:
The decline in pride in heritage, openly encouraged by Obama's repeated apologies to others for America's traditions & achievement--leading to Americans kneeling through the Star Spangled Banner;--his & Mrs. Clinton's siding with Soros financed thugs against the Police--leading to the cold blooded assassination of American cops;--their refusal to protect the border, leading to job losses among rooted Americans, brutal crimes against American women, and the despicable riots in California, where aliens who do not share our values, or honor our heritage, intimidate local officials into not celebrating the achievements of the Founding Fathers and their posterity.
It was only last week, when anti-American culturalists advocated not celebrating Columbus Day! The Obama/Clinton cabal seem intent on denying that our values & achievements, under uniquely American cultural values, grew directly out of the experience driven values of particular European settlers. That is fact. It takes nothing away from the achievements or values of any other people; but it is our fact, and we are entitled to honor that fact and the rich cultural heritage it reflects.
To the extent that the Obama/Clinton cabal would deny us pride in our history, they are truly bigoted enemies. But we do best, again, when we lament the success of our enemies, as we explain, again quietly and sadly, how totally despicable is this ongoing attack, coming indeed from those who have benefited so much, while gaming our system.
Some may think that this approach is going soft. It is precisely the opposite. In place of venting our wrath at the Obama/Clinton betrayal, we begin to instill wrath in some of those who otherwise would simply go along with the enemy, "to get along."
There is nothing the least bit new in these tactics. Anyone familiar with Shakespeare's play "Julius Caesar," is quite familiar with the technique. It worked in the play because it reflects a true understanding of the psychological factors involved.