Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Over 2,000 emails.
1 posted on 10/07/2016 1:57:48 PM PDT by Pinkbell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last
To: Pinkbell

Friday news dump


2 posted on 10/07/2016 2:00:07 PM PDT by Beautiful_Gracious_Skies
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pinkbell

assange got immunity?


3 posted on 10/07/2016 2:01:14 PM PDT by drewh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pinkbell

Soon find out if all sizzle and no steak.


4 posted on 10/07/2016 2:03:24 PM PDT by AU72
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pinkbell

Ohhhh Chaaarlieee Brooowwn...


7 posted on 10/07/2016 2:08:55 PM PDT by MNDude (God is not a Republican, but Satan is certainly a Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pinkbell

Are these emails she claims were personal?


8 posted on 10/07/2016 2:10:19 PM PDT by DrDude (This poll)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pinkbell

OOH there is some good stuff in these emails, like how “Fifty percent of the population are illiterates!” HA HA HA!! And Stu Eisenstadt’s note to Podesta on how Hillary should discuss the Iran agreement!! Hey Team Trump! Hey Hope Hicks! I HOPE YOU ARE TAKING NOTES!!!


11 posted on 10/07/2016 2:13:49 PM PDT by browniexyz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pinkbell

He dumped it 2 minutes after this - https://www.dhs.gov/news/2016/10/07/joint-statement-department-homeland-security-and-office-director-national

I believe Julian said they would have egg on their face if they tried to blame the leaks on Russia.


14 posted on 10/07/2016 2:16:31 PM PDT by Voluntaryist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pinkbell

Not sure why the `rats are in high dudgeon over the Rooskies and their e-mail. It sounds like any bright junior high kid with an HP could take a look at them if they wanted.
She was the town pump .....


18 posted on 10/07/2016 2:20:46 PM PDT by tumblindice (America's founding fathers, all armed conservatives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pinkbell

Why only 2,050 Podesta emails were released,out of 50,000?


24 posted on 10/07/2016 2:26:57 PM PDT by Wisconsinlady (What we tolerate today, our children will embrace tomorrow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pinkbell

$250,000.00 is Chump Change to Hillary:

“To judge from those disclosures — which list the contributions in ranges rather than precise amounts — the only Uranium One official to give to the Clinton Foundation was Mr. Telfer, the chairman, and the amount was relatively small: no more than $250,000”


34 posted on 10/07/2016 2:33:15 PM PDT by Uncle Miltie (This posting is a microaggression.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pinkbell

Search from addresses @nytimes.com and also @washingtonpost.com...


36 posted on 10/07/2016 2:34:02 PM PDT by Geronimo (Voting for Hillary is the political equivalent of coprophagia...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pinkbell; SE Mom; nutmeg; maggief

#Podesta on Twitter!


37 posted on 10/07/2016 2:34:19 PM PDT by Miss Didi ("After all...tomorrow is another day." Scarlett O'Hara, Gone with the Wind)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pinkbell
Here's a good one. Link. Read the whole thing ... Emphasis added and redacted for brevity:

==

Iran Nuclear Deal

From:seizenstat@cov.com
To: Jake.Sullivan@gmail.com
Date: 2015-06-22 04:23
Subject: Iran Nuclear Deal

Dear Jake,

I have sent several detailed notes on the Iran nuclear deal, and will avoid repetition. But with the June 30 deadline fast approaching (although it may be extended), and with Hillary certain to be pressed on whether she supports the deal and will urge Congress not to disapprove it, I wanted to share a few thoughts.

1. This could well be a voting issue for many moderates in the Jewish community. The mainstream organized leadership will almost certainly oppose the deal, along with Israel and all the Republican candidates, Saudi Arabia and the Gulf States, and perhaps Egypt.

2. While we cannot be sure until there is a final agreement, it appears that many of the open issues since the preliminary accord, may be resolved in Iran's favor:

(1) Enriched uranium will stay in Iran for dilution, rather than be sent to Russia or France for reprocessing.

(2) Sanctions will not be phased-out commensurate with compliance, as the US Fact Sheet indicated after the last "agreement", but may come off more quickly. This will transfer billions to Iran and enhance its funding for terrorism and its efforts to gain hegemony in the region.

(3) It is not clear what Iran will be required to do on PMD, if anything. This was required of Iraq by the UNSC in September 2002. Iran should be held to the same standard. They have yet to answer 11 of the 12 IAEA questions, yet UN sanctions will be lifted.

(4) Russia, China and Iran itself may be able to block "snapback" sanctions if there is a violation of the agreement. US companies will be disadvantaged compared to European companies, since many US non-nuclear sanctions will remain, while all EU sanctions are nuclear-related.

(5) Military sites (Parchin) are likely to be off the table for inspections.

(6) Iran will likely be able to do research on advanced centrifuges, which enrich more uranium more rapidly than the current generation. This would markedly reduce the breakout time in the last years of the accord. Presidenr Obama has conceded this point (e.g. David Sanger article in NYT, April 8, 2015)

(7) Iran will have an industrial size nuclear program, and will be left as a "nuclear capable state".

(8) Iran will be able to keep 1000 centrifuges at Fordo.

(9) Nothing in the agreement will limit its support for terrorism.

41 posted on 10/07/2016 2:36:24 PM PDT by SSS Two
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pinkbell
HRC paid speeches (credit @Cernovich)

45 posted on 10/07/2016 2:37:59 PM PDT by Voluntaryist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pinkbell
 
 
"BS" is Bernie Sanders, heh heh.
 
 
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/238
 
From:bfallon@hillaryclinton.com
To: john@algpolling.com
Date: 2015-10-04 17:24
Subject: Re: BS and guns
 
Circling back around on guns as a follow up to the Friday morning discussion: the Today show has indicated they definitely plan to ask bout guns, and so to have the discussion be more of a news event than her previous times discussing guns, we are going to background reporters tonight on a few of the specific proposals she would support as President - universal background checks of course, but also closing the gun show loophole by executive order and imposing manufacturer liability.
 
On Friday, October 2, 2015, John Anzalone wrote:
 
>Here is the BS interview last night on tragedy/guns last night I
> referenced on the call where he punts on gun manufacturer liability. He
> also keeps using the term “sensible” gun legislation
>
> *MSNBC’s All in With Chris Hayes: Bernie Sanders on Gun Control and Oregon
> Shooting*
>
 
 

63 posted on 10/07/2016 2:56:35 PM PDT by lapsus calami (What's that stink? Code Pink ! ! And their buddy Murtha, too!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pinkbell

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/1213

“Why is Jake Tapper such a dick”


66 posted on 10/07/2016 3:02:19 PM PDT by Bogey78O (We had a good run. Coulda been great still.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pinkbell

Bttt.

5.56mm


68 posted on 10/07/2016 3:06:42 PM PDT by M Kehoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pinkbell

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/275

Two NYT reporters coordinating with Clinton’s people for damage control on release of the book `Clinton Cash’.


72 posted on 10/07/2016 3:11:52 PM PDT by tumblindice (America's founding fathers, all armed conservatives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pinkbell

Paid Speeches: https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/927


79 posted on 10/07/2016 3:20:31 PM PDT by GraceG (Only a fool works hard in an environment where hard work is not appreciated...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pinkbell

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/297

Asking if they can get Elijah Cummings to bring up emails in Congress.

“Who is the right person to raise a simple question of the audacity of > members of congress asking others to release their emails when they don’t”


81 posted on 10/07/2016 3:21:50 PM PDT by Bogey78O (We had a good run. Coulda been great still.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson