Friday news dump
assange got immunity?
Soon find out if all sizzle and no steak.
Ohhhh Chaaarlieee Brooowwn...
Are these emails she claims were personal?
OOH there is some good stuff in these emails, like how “Fifty percent of the population are illiterates!” HA HA HA!! And Stu Eisenstadt’s note to Podesta on how Hillary should discuss the Iran agreement!! Hey Team Trump! Hey Hope Hicks! I HOPE YOU ARE TAKING NOTES!!!
He dumped it 2 minutes after this - https://www.dhs.gov/news/2016/10/07/joint-statement-department-homeland-security-and-office-director-national
I believe Julian said they would have egg on their face if they tried to blame the leaks on Russia.
Not sure why the `rats are in high dudgeon over the Rooskies and their e-mail. It sounds like any bright junior high kid with an HP could take a look at them if they wanted.
She was the town pump .....
Why only 2,050 Podesta emails were released,out of 50,000?
$250,000.00 is Chump Change to Hillary:
“To judge from those disclosures — which list the contributions in ranges rather than precise amounts — the only Uranium One official to give to the Clinton Foundation was Mr. Telfer, the chairman, and the amount was relatively small: no more than $250,000”
Search from addresses @nytimes.com and also @washingtonpost.com...
#Podesta on Twitter!
==
Iran Nuclear Deal
From:seizenstat@cov.com
To: Jake.Sullivan@gmail.com
Date: 2015-06-22 04:23
Subject: Iran Nuclear Deal
Dear Jake,
I have sent several detailed notes on the Iran nuclear deal, and will avoid repetition. But with the June 30 deadline fast approaching (although it may be extended), and with Hillary certain to be pressed on whether she supports the deal and will urge Congress not to disapprove it, I wanted to share a few thoughts.
1. This could well be a voting issue for many moderates in the Jewish community. The mainstream organized leadership will almost certainly oppose the deal, along with Israel and all the Republican candidates, Saudi Arabia and the Gulf States, and perhaps Egypt.
2. While we cannot be sure until there is a final agreement, it appears that many of the open issues since the preliminary accord, may be resolved in Iran's favor:
(1) Enriched uranium will stay in Iran for dilution, rather than be sent to Russia or France for reprocessing.
(2) Sanctions will not be phased-out commensurate with compliance, as the US Fact Sheet indicated after the last "agreement", but may come off more quickly. This will transfer billions to Iran and enhance its funding for terrorism and its efforts to gain hegemony in the region.
(3) It is not clear what Iran will be required to do on PMD, if anything. This was required of Iraq by the UNSC in September 2002. Iran should be held to the same standard. They have yet to answer 11 of the 12 IAEA questions, yet UN sanctions will be lifted.
(4) Russia, China and Iran itself may be able to block "snapback" sanctions if there is a violation of the agreement. US companies will be disadvantaged compared to European companies, since many US non-nuclear sanctions will remain, while all EU sanctions are nuclear-related.
(5) Military sites (Parchin) are likely to be off the table for inspections.
(6) Iran will likely be able to do research on advanced centrifuges, which enrich more uranium more rapidly than the current generation. This would markedly reduce the breakout time in the last years of the accord. Presidenr Obama has conceded this point (e.g. David Sanger article in NYT, April 8, 2015)
(7) Iran will have an industrial size nuclear program, and will be left as a "nuclear capable state".
(8) Iran will be able to keep 1000 centrifuges at Fordo.
(9) Nothing in the agreement will limit its support for terrorism.
Bttt.
5.56mm
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/275
Two NYT reporters coordinating with Clinton’s people for damage control on release of the book `Clinton Cash’.
Paid Speeches: https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/927
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/297
Asking if they can get Elijah Cummings to bring up emails in Congress.
“Who is the right person to raise a simple question of the audacity of > members of congress asking others to release their emails when they don’t”