Figure 1: A comparison of the control of transcription in E. Coli (left) with the Linux call graph (right). The bacterial cell is able to control many protein-coding genes (green lines at bottom) with relatively few controls (yellow and purple lines). Linux, while obviously a result of intelligent design, falls far short in that it requires many more high-level instructions to control relatively few outputs. From Yan et al. 2010.1
Related post!
Three-Dimensional DNA Code Defies Evolution
4-27-2015
by Jeffrey Tomkins, Ph.D.
Posted on 4/27/2015, 9:00:46 AM by fishtank
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3283555/posts
It just kind of happened. Because millions of years.
There are many things that defy naturalistic explanaition. Such as the existence of a finite nature, the objectivity of moral principles, the objectivity of reason, and the ability of people to experience nature and interact with it including making choices. None of these things we experienced so often we take them for granted can fit in a model that is saddled down with the arbitrary presumption of naturalistic materialism. While some forms of naturalism venture from materialism just far enough to admit the basic facts of these observations as if they were one off exceptions, I must reject them as silly stubbornness. If I just believe in giraffes and somebody showed me a documentary video with giraffes in it it would be very silly of me to just assume that the only part of the giraffes that existed were the outside of the animal facing the camera. Either I should make the case that the giraffes were some kind of computer simulated hoax or accept that they are likely to be full working animals with more to them then I can see.
Emergent complexity is worth studying. Amazing complexity can & does arise from simple rules & processes. Be humble enough to realize that not understanding how it happened doesn’t mean it’s not simple. And realize that intelligent design doesn’t mean it didn’t take a long time to arrive at current states.
Check out this related video.
Drew Berry: Animations of unseeable biology
This is a very good representation of some of the machinery in play .... amazing!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WFCvkkDSfIU
Amen, fishtank. The idea that life sprang from lifeless chemicals is absurd, with all we now know about the stupendous complexity of life. To evolutionists I say, “Prove it.” Throw lifeless chemicals together and make a “simple” single-celled organism. Until then, theirs is just as much a faith-based belief as mine.
Because the more complex life is, the less tenable evolutionary theory becomes.
...
Actually, evolutionary theory supports the improbability and rarity of life as we know it, I think.
Too bad the ICR is so biased that it’s a bad source of information on the subject.
