[SERKIT]

How about some forensic study of Hillary’s podium rigged for a portable teleprompter, or her earpiece?

[Oldeconomybuyer]

What else was rigged?

[Brilliant]

Why didn’t he stop the debate and tell them to fix it?

[BenLurkin]

“Was that on purpose?”

[CatOwner]

Typical DEM tactic. Apologize after the horse has left the barn.

[vinny29]

I will bet on purpose>

[ZULU]

Trump posed the question: “Was that on purpose?”

Of course not. It could have happened to any other conservative Republican!

[detective]

Defective microphone for Trump, Clinton earpiece, hand signals, rigged moderator, electronic device on Clinton’s lectern and Clinton got the questions in advance.

The debate was rigged and Trump still won.

[fhayek]

Let’s see. The mic was defective. The moderator was erroneously ‘fact checking’ Trump. Trump was interrupted ten times more than Clinton. Clinton had an oddly itchy face, and Clinton was allowed to sucker punch Trump with a sketchy story about a fat beauty queen, that the press was ready to run with. But it was all ‘inadvertent’.

[Diogenesis]

They cheated in so many ways.

Gave the Benghazi Witch the questions, and she them
with a errant FedExNBC operative picking up the pieces
of paper.

Different podium, the Witch’s with electronic cheating.

AND NOT ONE MSM ANCHOR WILL DISCUSS IT.
IT IS ELECTION FRAUD.
THEY BELONG IN PRISON WITH COMEY.

[Democrats hate too much]

Damn, he had everything thrown at him then...

[Gay State Conservative]

And now on to the question of *her* earpiece.

[TXBlair]

Hmm. Well. “After the fact” seems the appropriate time to address the issue when you KNEW it was a problem during the debates./s

We ALL knew both of their mics were screwy. For one thing, we couldn’t hear Pickles wheeze. Hers was probably silenced in between the comments she barfed out.

[NEMDF]

Next debate, he should wait until they are all ready to start, then he should insist on trading spots with her. That might be enough to make her faint right there!

[browniexyz]

He had a defective mic; she had a “custom” podium complete with a teleprompter!! What the heck!!!

[Verginius Rufus]

"Was that on purpose?"

Rhetorical question.

[rdcbn]

Not only was Trumps mic sabotaged intentionally to make him look bad, it sure sounds like Hillary's voice was run through a Milli Vanilli style voice synthesizer to make her infamously grating, finger nails on a chalk board voice sound more mellow and less annoying.

[gaijin]

Whether it’s four years ago or now it seems like whenever there’s a debate it involves a conservative having to trust Network people.

that just never works.

The next one should be on OAN, moderated by Milo.

let them suck on that.

[Sans-Culotte]

Wow, they could just trust Holt to take care of Trump for them. This is like the King in Hamlet having the poisoned wine for Hamlet to drink in case Laertes didn’t wound him with the poisoned rapier. Over-kill.

[Ohioan]

After giving this careful analysis, some committee should be formed with a reasonable budget, to target a carefully selected listing of those most likely to respond favorably to this concept: Making the Presidential election to a major extent a rebuff to those who would use American Freedom of the Press to promote an amoral, "our ends justify any necessary means," to foist our will on the American public.

I am sure that a computerized scan of web blogs could be designed to ferret out a list of people, whose public commentary indicates that they would pick up such an idea and run with it.

The ammunition, of course, would be a verifiable list of all the dirty tricks to which the Trump campaign has been subjected by an amoral cadre of journalistic bullies, who seek to tear down the America, Trump wants to revitalize.