Posted on 09/29/2016 6:47:13 AM PDT by Whenifhow
Earlier during our initial review of the debate we identified something that looked entirely suspicious because it is only evidenced for one specific candidate, and one specific lectern. We initially drew attention to it as “The Cleaner”:
Well, this intrigue just got a whole lot more interesting.
See “The Cleaner” at work here immediately following the debate:
https://twitter.com/gigi2my4/status/781122139696930816
The Cleaner has been identified as George Lewis, a former member of NBC staff:
🐸PepeTrump @fige1000 Remember the guy that took the notepad from Hillary's podium at the debate? George Lewis, NBC Nightly News Staff @Cernovich@mitchellvii
https://twitter.com/fige1000/status/781288137536446465/photo/1
Wiki: George Lewis (born 1943) is a retired American television journalist who worked for NBC News for 43 years from 1969 to 2012. His stories have appeared on NBC Nightly News.
Lewis joined NBC in December 1969 as a war correspondent covering the Vietnam War. He also covered the Iranian hostage crisis from 1979 to 1981, the 1989 Tiananmen Square revolt in China, and Operation Desert Storm in 1991. Lewis has won three Emmys, the George Foster Peabody Award, and the Edward R. Murrow Award throughout his career covering wars and other events abroad. (link)
Lester Holt, the debate moderator, works for NBC. George Lewis, “the cleaner” is now “Freelancing“ Watch:
https://twitter.com/ChatRevolve/status/781306081746284550
Here’s where it gets even more interesting. And again, unfortunately no-one is putting these disparate segments together into one cohesive story. First this video where something electronic is clearly visible on Hillary Clinton’s lectern at the conclusion of the debate. Notice it is not present on Donald Trump’s lectern:
1:37 Minutes HILLARY DEBATE TELEPROMPTER CAUGHT ON CAMERA https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=97&v=rzTeRZ9M_lU
There is definitely something going on there, and we already know these were custom built lecterns (podiums) for each candidate. Whatever that is on Hillary’s lectern is not seen operational on Donald Trump’s.
Now here’s another video which delves into both “the cleaner”, and the activity in/around the lectern. Unfortunately the uploader’s narrative makes him sound like a loon. Annoyingly, this is a problem we often run into when there is indeed something very important in the content, but the person creating the video’s narrative is over-the-top. This is where CTH really misses having Diwataman as a frequent YouTube contributor.
Watch the video, at least the first 10 minutes, because it is indeed important. [Ignore the entire last 10 minutes] You have to ignore the barking conspiratorial aspects of the person who created it. Focus on the content, not the narration per se’.
20:51 Minutes Proof Hillary Clinton's Corrupt, crookedness @ debate stage, worse than "Watergate"⚪️ 🔴 🔵Podium Gate https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RIYdjq2Wa6E
It’s the over-the-top conspiracy narration makes videos like this too easy for people to dismiss. As a result the important facts and truth get hidden or ignored because the creators sound like moonbats. It is frustrating because these videos could be extremely valuable for truth finding.
All of that said, the essential elements remain. The cleaner, George Lewis, was trying to remove, and did eventually remove, something much more than just notes atop the lectern. Another person also is seen removing something. All of the key players are very aware of, and very cautious of, the people around them when they are in “cleaning mode”.
Additionally, there’s entirely too much evidence of two things which somewhat relate to what we are seeing here.
#1) Hillary Clinton has no lower visual field. We’ve pointed this out for well over a year, her eyesight is compromised in the lower part of her eyesight. Stairs are a serious issue. Her eyeglasses contain prism lenses, everyone accepts that – however, there’s something beyond that aspect regarding her vision. More than likely she wears some kind of contact lenses to assist her eyesight. This might be the issue with her lower field of vision problem when wearing them. Once you are aware of it, it becomes very noticeable.
Photo
#2) Again, as pointed out for well over two years – When Hillary Clinton is in a public forum where she will be answering questions, or giving a speech with the potential for follow-ups, she uses a very specific single cordless microphone. Anytime there is a possibility for her to have an unscripted moment, she always has a single cordless microphone. Never, even during press events, does she have a bank of microphones or multi-microphones on a podium, pedestal or palate.
She uses a double mic for speeches when there’s no risk of “off script”; but when there is a risk of “off script” need, it is always the single cordless mic. With or without the flexi mic-holder. Often she chooses to hold the mic in her hands.
Looks like 3 equipment status lights are on in the shelf below Hillary’s wrist.
More info here; see first two pics in the story that is linked in this comment:
Story:
Everybody knows it's Ne'-ve-da.
Longer vid linked here
ID’ed
Fox news
Lou Dobbs picked up on it; next comment says he’s covering it in his show:
Hand motions
Lou Dobbs showed the vid on his broadcast (not sure which one)
Pic from other events:
Thanks very much for the post; ping. BTTT!
That's all he did? That's expected that he wouldn't want his notes left for anyone to take.
Hillary's multiple cleaners look like they were movers cleaning out a house. They kept going back for more.
Ok, Fine.
Convo seems to go on as if only clinton had a cleaner. I don’t want us to look stupid that’s why I mentioned that trump had one also. Granted, his had less work. Unfortunately Trump’s cleaner missed the piece of paper that fell to the floor.
Back to clinton and her lectern light. Perhaps we should look at previous debates of earlier years to see if that light was used before or was even present. Maybe Trump did not need that light... (because he was not reading from his notes)
The difference between pronouncing aunt as “ant” or “aunt”. Those who pronounce aunt as aunt also tend to pronounce Nevada in the way you don’t like.
I don’t care how you pronounce it. I was just putting the accent on the first syllable.
Another video..............https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JsriYyuigVo&feature=youtu.be
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.