Posted on 09/12/2016 1:01:01 PM PDT by BlackFemaleArmyColonel
Rush Limbaugh thinks that there are two separate videos of Hillary Clinton stumbling into her car but one of them is a fake.
Limbaugh came upon this idea apparently because the radio host does not understand that, often, pirated videos will appear on YouTube having been mirrored, or flipped, from the original source.
Limbaugh said:
In the first video, the van approaches from the left. So what they want you to believe is that theyve simply flipped this to show you a new angle. But you cant flip the video. I mean, you can play a video backwards, forwards, but it doesnt change the angle youre looking at. The footage is identical.
The second video purports to show a new angle. And this new angle shows Hillary in even greater distress, or I should say gives you a better view of the distress, than the first video. But what is intriguing to me is that nobody seems to have noticed that it cant be the same video. How can, in one video, the van approach from the left and the door on the right side of the van open and Mrs. Clinton gets in. In the next video, same setting, but the van approaches from the right with the street being on the left of it. And then the door opens in the van, which would be the left side of the van and then Mrs. Clinton gets in.
And all of the people in the video appear to be properly placed, and they appear to be reversed, lapel pins are on the opposite lapel in the second video. Its a really great trick, but the second video cant be one of the two cant be real.
(Excerpt) Read more at mediaite.com ...
Stfu, Limbaugh, you just proved you don’t know wtf you’re talking about.
Wow. Limbaugh is clueless. Both he and that little coward Mark Levin should just go away already.
The video was flipped so that it would gain new viewers who would think it was a different video on YouTube. I didn’t notice it at first until I watched the bald guy and realized it was just a mirrored video.
That’s absurd..
No, he said the video from ‘a different angle’ was just the original reversed and there was no way to determine any new info from it. He says that stuff happens all the time, in this case it was reversed and zoomed in a bit to appear different. That’s all.
This is embarrassing.
Fake as in “to fake out,” to feint.
The mirror image is put up, to get people talking about it and then to present the “expose’” that it is incorrect.
Somehow it is not seemly to hop all over Rush about this. Nor is it seemly to hop all over Rush about some headline writer’s misrepresentation.
Yeeees yeeeeees yeeeeees for decades he has hidden and by virtue of a non political figure he has been uncovered!!! Revealed!!!! No one saw this!! It’s amazing! A discovery of epic proportions! Someone should be awarded a Pulitzer! Whoever did this is genius!
Please!
Just because we have “some” that don’t agree lockstep with our candidate doesn’t make them a traitor, shill, leftist, etc. That would be an Obamabot, a mindless drone, a cult of personality. Trump has said some very stupid things and some things not conservative at all. Just because one does not agree doesn’t make them what you attempt to make one to be.
That isn’t thinking, that’s called democrat.
How the hell did he not know that from the start?
Lots of people flip the video when they reposted in on YT to avoid their copyright bot bulling the video when the owner decided to claim it.
Jeesh! If he wants to be part of the story that damn bad, then find a better way than putting out stupid stuff like that.
The ‘2nd video” (where the van approaches from the right) is simply the 1st video that was mirrored. It was also edited (zoomed in).
Everything is a mirror image. Look at the SS agent standing in the center of the video and is in front of the tree. In the 1st video, his credentials are on the right lapel. In the 2nd video, they are on the left side.
Mirror image of the same video. The 2nd video was edited to zoom in to get a closer look.
The radio antenna is on the wrong side and so is the sliding door. The video is flipped. Rush is flipped. Maybe he is taking heroin now. He sure has become disconnected.
Everyone, apparently, except Limbaugh.
The ‘2nd video” (where the van approaches from the right) is simply the 1st video that was mirrored. It was also edited (zoomed in).
Everything is a mirror image. Look at the SS agent standing in the center of the video and is in front of the tree. In the 1st video, his credentials are on the right lapel. In the 2nd video, they are on the left side.
Mirror image of the same video. The 2nd video was edited to zoom in to get a closer look.
That’s what u get for relying on a biased report. Listen to Rush in full and you’ll know what he’s talking about. This guy just took bits and pieces and made his own story.
That is not what he said. He said it was a reversed image video someone made so they could sell the new video as a different view. He called it a hoax. Why are you saying this? Check the transcript.
/////////////
That is exactly right and what he said; I was listening live. He was not fooled, he was calling them out on THEIR LIE on THEM saying it was another angle. He knew what he was talking about.
DAMMIT...
There are ONLY two videos. But one of them had two different online versions, one of them is the mirror image reversed by someone’s cell phone OR on purpose by computer.
The reason they sometimes reverse a video is to avoid havving it scrubbed from the internet. To the computer software that ‘scrubs’ the internet, it looks like a different video.
The videos of the car heading to the right, on the right side of the road are the originals. There is a REVERSED copy of one of them online, that shows what would be a car on the wrong side of the road heading toward the left (wrong way on the wrong side of the road) THAT ONE is the reversed one.
W
Were people talking backwards on the flipped video? (just being sarcastic).
He actually did say the word when referring to the flopped/reversed footage.
For some reason he believes it “shows more” of Clintons staggering around. It doesn’t.
Mr tech, Mr apple...doesn’t understand this was simply mirrored? He’s an idiot.
...No, he said the video from a different angle was just the original reversed....
That’s exactly what be said.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.