Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Chemotherapy warning as hundreds die from cancer-fighting drugs (chemo may kill up to 50% patients
UK Telegraph ^ | 08/30/2016 | Sarah Knapton

Posted on 09/07/2016 3:33:50 PM PDT by MarchonDC09122009

Chemotherapy warning as hundreds die from cancer-fighting drugs (cancer drugs may kill up to 50 % patients)

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/2016/08/30/chemotherapy-warning-as-hundreds-die-from-cancer-fighting-drugs/

Sarah Knapton, Science Editor 30 August 2016

Patients should be warned about the dangers of chemotherapy after research showed that cancer drugs are killing up to 50 per cent of patients in some hospitals.

For the first time researchers looked at the numbers of cancer patients who died within 30 days of starting chemotherapy, which indicates that the medication is the cause of death, rather than the cancer.

In Milton Keynes the death rate for lung cancer treatment was 50.9 per cent, although it was based on a very small number of patients.

Deaths of lung cancer patients from chemotherapy were also far higher than the national average in Blackpool, Coventry, Derby, South Tyneside and Surrey and Sussex, according to the research.

Similarly, around one in five people who underwent palliative care for breast cancer at Cambridge University Hospitals died from their treatment.

Public Health England (PHE), said it had contacted the hospitals concerned to ask them to review practices.

More than 1,300 breast and lung cancer patients died because of chemotherapy in 2014, the study shows Chemotherapy is toxic for the body because it does not discriminate between healthy and cancerous cells.

They advised doctors to be more careful in selecting patients for treatment where it could do more harm than good.

“I think it’s important to make patients aware that there are potentially life threatening downsides to chemotherapy. And doctors should be more careful about who they treat with chemotherapy.”

Professor David Cameron, Edinburgh Cancer Centre, Western General Hospital, added: “The concern is that some of the patients dying within 30 days of being given chemo probably shouldn’t have been given the chemo.

The research was published in The Lancet Oncology.

(Excerpt) Read more at telegraph.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: cancer; cancersurvivors; cancerthread; cancertreatment; cancerwarriors; caregivers; chemicals; chemotherapy; deathrate; mortality; pharmaceuticals
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-159 next last
To: commish

Commish, I’m Very glad for you and your family that your recovery has been complete and long lasting.
Thank you for sharing what you went through.
Stay well+

RE: “I thank God every day for early detection and the miracle of life.”

AMEN


101 posted on 09/08/2016 12:02:50 PM PDT by MarchonDC09122009 (When is our next march on DC? When have we had enough?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62

True. But I or my siblings were never told that. What that means is that someone made the decision to give the minimal dose, knowing full well the possible negative ramifications. What his age the determining factor? Does that mean they thought “oh well, he is so old, why would it matter anyway since he had a good life”, or along those lines. Was is a “mini-death panel” decision? I guess we will never know.


102 posted on 09/08/2016 1:57:34 PM PDT by SgtHooper (If you remember the 60's, YOU WEREN'T THERE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: SgtHooper

Chemo side effects vary from one individual to the next. Some chemotherapy agents have worse side effects than others, also.


103 posted on 09/08/2016 2:00:18 PM PDT by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: RegulatorCountry

All I can hope was that they did it correctly. It seemed they were behind the 8-ball on a few other things as well, such as not using a PET scan to check for cell migration, but a less accurate method. Once migration had occurred, and especially to the brain, it was over.


104 posted on 09/08/2016 2:13:12 PM PDT by SgtHooper (If you remember the 60's, YOU WEREN'T THERE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: SgtHooper

What his age the determining factor? Does that mean they thought “oh well, he is so old, why would it matter anyway since he had a good life”, or along those lines. Was is a “mini-death panel” decision?

...

One possibility is they thought a regular dose of chemo would kill him right away. Look at some of the other comments on this thread.

Perhaps they didn’t do the PET scan because they knew there was nothing they could do if the cancer had spread. As it was he lived a couple of more years to 89. Maybe that was the best possible outcome.


105 posted on 09/08/2016 3:16:35 PM PDT by Moonman62 (Make America Great Again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: MarchonDC09122009

Joey was a strong Christian to the end, even putting Indy’s needs before hers, most of us would have clung tightly to our baby, but Joey began to distance herself from Indy, so the end would not be as hard on her. Being that young and being Down’s made a difference too. The Gospel album is beautiful mostly old favorites.

In the Garden https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DAhsVqbV3pg&list=RDDAhsVqbV3pg#t=0

This one is not on the album, it was my first intro to their music.

The Bible and the Belt https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9yESgfK5Lqk


106 posted on 09/08/2016 6:09:27 PM PDT by GailA (If politicians won't keep their promises to the Military, they won't keep them to you!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: MarchonDC09122009

BFL.

I have lots to say about this.


107 posted on 09/08/2016 6:27:13 PM PDT by SouthParkRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MarchonDC09122009

My best friend with 3 months to live was talked into a pointless “clinical trial” and had his last conscious moment the day after to the chagrin of his wife and teenage children. Instead of putting his affairs in order and making peace with his family, he was gone before anyone could even say goodbye. Thanks NHS.


108 posted on 09/08/2016 6:32:40 PM PDT by anton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: metmom

Ok Metmom. So what’s your solution?

It’s about a billion to bring a drug to market through preclinical and clinical trial phases within the guidelines of FDA compliance. Nine out of ten compounds in the Onc field never make it there and If they do they are going to be subject to governmental price controls in pretty much every country other than the US and I hope you understand the ramifications of that statement.

The US is the single greatest catalyst for funding the worlds global pharma pipeline. The reason foreign firms are allocating capital to bring new drugs to market is that they know they can sell into our ours. Sans that? You had better be happy with the drugs available now because new ones will be few and far between.


109 posted on 09/08/2016 7:46:22 PM PDT by SouthParkRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: BykrBayb

Only ignorant people would get cancer, heart disease and strokes.

That is predominantly true. Non readers rely on fad and commercial myth. They only act when they get the bad news of cancer. They finally throw away the cigarettes, but by then it is too late.

Sorry to be brutal but ignorance can be cured by any willing person. And that is the best cure for cancer. What we don’t know does hurt us.


110 posted on 09/08/2016 8:34:04 PM PDT by TheNext (Hillary Hurts Children & Women)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: TheNext; AllAmericanGirl44; Armen Hareyan; B4Ranch; Balata; Ban Draoi Marbh Draoi; bayareablues; ..

Cancer Warriors Ping

TheNext, I’m really not up to explaining to you how your arrogance will not make you immune to cancer. I only hope you don’t have to learn that the hard way.

Meanwhile, maybe one of my fellow “illiterate,” “ignorant,” cancer warriors can explain it to you, while I go tend to my husband who was “stupid” enough to have a stroke.

May God bless you with a lesson in humility, and the knowledge that your good fortune doesn’t mean you’re better than everyone else.


111 posted on 09/09/2016 4:13:45 AM PDT by BykrBayb (Lung cancer free since 11/9/07. Colon cancer free since 7/7/15. PTL ~ Þ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: PAR35

Yes I wondered about that too.


112 posted on 09/09/2016 4:39:55 AM PDT by kalee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: dhs12345
Billions, trillions? have been spent on research and yet treatment hasn’t changed much in 20/30 years — the two options: chemo and radiation.

This is absolutely false. Radiation and and platinum-based chemotherapies are still used as a first-line treatment of some cancers, that is true. But there is a HUGE shift into targeted treatments: monoclonal antibodies, oral medicines that attack cancer cell pathways, and immuno-oncology drugs are changing the way oncologists treat patients.

I myself, am a benefactor of the targeted therapy cetuximab, also known as Erbitux. The side effect profile is minimal, and very tolerable. I am over three years cancer-free (HNSCC), and the treatment was considered curative, not palliative.

113 posted on 09/09/2016 6:12:52 AM PDT by Lou L (Health "insurance" is NOT the same as health "care")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: TheNext
The prevention begins with fruits and veggies and not abusing oneself. It is NOT B.S., as those are often touted. It has been majorly studied, successfully.

With all due respect, your post is borderline quackery. There are indeed MANY causes of cancer, some caused by genetic reasons, others caused by environmental. Some cancers are a result of both. Additionally, a pancreatic cancer is different from lymphomas; breast cancers are different than leukemias; soft-tissue cancers are different than lung cancers.

Your examples are purely anecdotal, and multiple anecdotes do not equal "data."

114 posted on 09/09/2016 6:31:40 AM PDT by Lou L (Health "insurance" is NOT the same as health "care")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: Lou L

Yet there is no cure.

Also how mainstream are the treatments that you are talking whwn we are still talking about chemo as a primary treatment. For as much as we have spent on cancer research over the decades WE SHOULD HVE A CURE! And yet we don’t have a cure.


115 posted on 09/09/2016 6:38:26 AM PDT by dhs12345
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: MarchonDC09122009

My husband had lung cancer and we were told he had great chance to be cured or at least have 5 to 10 years more. We chose chemotherapy because we didn’t know what else to do. He had chemo nine times and it destroyed his breathing capacity....the cancer never changed. It was 4 tiny dots on the screen, before and after the chemo. He died from a heart attack, caused by the lack of oxygen. How I wish we had never done the chemo!

Be aware, my friends. Seek other options, if you can.


116 posted on 09/09/2016 7:39:38 AM PDT by jch10 (Stand strong! we have a country to save!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anton

Dear Anton,
Thank you for sharing this with us.
I am Very sorry for the difficult loss of your friend and what his family went through.
Please stay healthy, well and safe, one and all.

RE: “My best friend with 3 months to live was talked into a pointless “clinical trial” and had his last conscious moment the day after to the chagrin of his wife and teenage children. Instead of putting his affairs in order and making peace with his family, he was gone before anyone could even say goodbye. Thanks NHS.”


117 posted on 09/09/2016 8:07:19 AM PDT by MarchonDC09122009 (When is our next march on DC? When have we had enough?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: henkster

I’m with you. I have AML was treated with potent chemo and had a donor stem cell transplant as well. Would have died in 2 weeks without chemo. Chemo is nasty stuff. But, that poison saved my life. I’m over a year post treatment.

God bless you and your wife


118 posted on 09/09/2016 8:13:38 AM PDT by HollyB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Nifster

In order to get a donor stem cell transplant. Enough high dose chemo is given to kill the bone marrow. It’s the strongest chemo anyone will ever ft at a time. Them the cells are given and the recip starts fresh. I know I just had one.


119 posted on 09/09/2016 8:16:42 AM PDT by HollyB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: MarchonDC09122009

Yeah we kind of already knew that. Chemo is a last ditch treatment, it is really just trying to kill the “bad” part of you (cancer) before it manages to kill all of you. Trying to fix it when part of your body has turned against you is tough.


120 posted on 09/09/2016 8:20:21 AM PDT by discostu (If you need to load or unload go to the white zone, you'll love it, it's a way of life)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-159 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson