Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dhs12345
Billions, trillions? have been spent on research and yet treatment hasn’t changed much in 20/30 years — the two options: chemo and radiation.

This is absolutely false. Radiation and and platinum-based chemotherapies are still used as a first-line treatment of some cancers, that is true. But there is a HUGE shift into targeted treatments: monoclonal antibodies, oral medicines that attack cancer cell pathways, and immuno-oncology drugs are changing the way oncologists treat patients.

I myself, am a benefactor of the targeted therapy cetuximab, also known as Erbitux. The side effect profile is minimal, and very tolerable. I am over three years cancer-free (HNSCC), and the treatment was considered curative, not palliative.

113 posted on 09/09/2016 6:12:52 AM PDT by Lou L (Health "insurance" is NOT the same as health "care")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: Lou L

Yet there is no cure.

Also how mainstream are the treatments that you are talking whwn we are still talking about chemo as a primary treatment. For as much as we have spent on cancer research over the decades WE SHOULD HVE A CURE! And yet we don’t have a cure.


115 posted on 09/09/2016 6:38:26 AM PDT by dhs12345
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson