Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hillary Signed She Received Briefing on Classified Info, But Told FBI She Hadn't
Weekly Standard ^ | Septembe 2, 2016 | Jeryl Bier

Posted on 09/02/2016 1:32:14 PM PDT by Zakeet

Either Hillary Clinton lied to the FBI or she lied on a State Department form as she began her tenure as Secretary of State. This conclusion appears inescapable after Friday's FBI document release related to the Clinton email investigation.

See the two conflicting documents.

(Excerpt) Read more at weeklystandard.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: clinton; elections; emails; highcrimes; hillary; nosecurityclearance; perjury; scandal; securitybreach; securityclearance; securityrisk; treason; trumpwasright; unfittoserve
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last
To: Zakeet
Hillary never used a secure government server for a single email. Not one!

Yet the FBI can’t figure out that she purposely avoided using government servers.
Congress can’t seem figure that out either.

Clinton told FBI she didn't understand classified intel

She must be too stupid to handle orders at a Taco Bell!

21 posted on 09/02/2016 2:25:12 PM PDT by TigersEye (~Putin made me post this!~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Make that "What did the Secretary forget, and when did she forget it?"
22 posted on 09/02/2016 2:36:43 PM PDT by DJ Frisat (Hey, what happened to my clever tag line?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

Short Term Memory Blues

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MhsPYMdxxM4


23 posted on 09/02/2016 2:42:34 PM PDT by Leep (Cut the crap!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

Hitlery has had the same lapse in recall each time she has given testimony. Well before she bumped her head.


24 posted on 09/02/2016 2:44:46 PM PDT by fella ("As it was before Noah so shall it be again,")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

They wouldn’t let any other common criminal get away with this nonsense.

When uncommon criminality was a common Clinton trait.

They got Capone they’ll get her.
She has woven a noose of lies that will eventually
hang her.


25 posted on 09/02/2016 2:46:22 PM PDT by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: fhayek

Not taking up for the hag, but I often write dates that way, except I would write 22 Jan 2009.


26 posted on 09/02/2016 2:55:14 PM PDT by Protect the Bill of Rights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

#1. Hillary: “What difference does it make now”?


27 posted on 09/02/2016 3:00:40 PM PDT by MadMax, the Grinning Reaper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Protect the Bill of Rights

See, I don’t CARE how YOU write the date. The FORM asked for the date in the format “mm-dd-yyyy”


28 posted on 09/02/2016 3:18:45 PM PDT by fhayek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: fhayek

Point well taken-
Sincerely,
PTBOR
2 Sept 2016 :-)


29 posted on 09/02/2016 3:27:15 PM PDT by Protect the Bill of Rights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Protect the Bill of Rights

nice


30 posted on 09/02/2016 3:30:37 PM PDT by fhayek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Protect the Bill of Rights

I suspect that you have done some genealogy. I record important dates in a format similar to what you do. 7 January 1806, 15 March 1945. I generally dislike shortcuts and abbreviations. Write the damn thing out already. Are the two extra seconds that you save really worth the potential confusion?


31 posted on 09/02/2016 3:35:37 PM PDT by fhayek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: thesharkboy

Good find. And even her oath of office required her to swear to support and defend the constitution which means it is her duty to make sure sensitive information is not released that can harm the US. There is no accident. There is none available. You don’t make mistakes with national security. If you do, you are punished, period

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rVxLzs4YQPY

red


32 posted on 09/02/2016 3:40:44 PM PDT by Redwood71
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Redwood71

Do you think that the head of the FBI( passed her the tongue after excusing her behavior? Just askin’...


33 posted on 09/02/2016 3:45:26 PM PDT by hal ogen (First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: thesharkboy

From her NDA: “Classified information is marked or unmarked classified information”

Welcome to the Banana Republic of America


34 posted on 09/02/2016 3:57:52 PM PDT by ReaganGeneration2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: thesharkboy

“”Note that she couldn’t even get the date format correct.””

I noticed that and the shaky way it’s written...


35 posted on 09/02/2016 5:18:30 PM PDT by Thank You Rush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Protect the Bill of Rights
I often write dates that way, except I would write 22 Jan 2009.

I write dates the same way, to avoid confusion. I've been told that it's military style.

36 posted on 09/02/2016 5:25:12 PM PDT by Windflier (Pitchforks and torches ripen on the vine. Left too long, they become black rifles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

comey should resign in shame or be impeached this is a f’n joke of an investigation i don’t know how he and the fbi agents can look themselves in the mirror.....WHAT EXPERIENCE DID THE INTERROGATORS HAVE?

COMEY:

...”I believe this investigation was conducted consistent with the highest traditions of the FBI,” Comey said.
....
“Our folks did it in an apolitical and professional way, including our recommendation as to the appropriate resolution of this case.”

...We have no basis to conclude she lied to the FBI,” Comey said. (ROFLMAO)

....Comey said his team of FBI agents reviewed “thousands and thousands” of documents during the course of the investigation. He called the agents involved “an all-star team,” and said the agents who questioned Clinton were “real pros.”....

IMO SOUNDS LIKE THE 1919 BLACK SOCKS.....all-star my behind real pros yeah I buy that- professional divers....


37 posted on 09/02/2016 6:03:56 PM PDT by rolling_stone (our founders are rolling over in their graves, and yelling 2nd amendment when all else fails)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hal ogen

He ain’t paid enough for that.

All I know is I worked under the government computer systems for a lot of years. I, also, took an oath to protect and defend the Constitution. I also was given a SAAR and training culminating in the awarding of a security level clearance. (And because I worked with NBC internationally, my requirement was near what hers should be) She had a duty to make sure she was not fostering information at any level, to anyone that did not have the clearance and need to know. It is not a sit back and see what happens. It is a proactive effort to make the complete effort not to compromise our security. Intent has nothing to do with it. She violated protocol, intentionally by using a server not under the vigelence of the feds, and in doing so, released nation security information. She did this so she wouldn’t have to need access to a secure device and still do her shopping list. She also wanted to keep all her eggs in one basket and when the whistle was blown, bleached it to cover her tracks. No intent? Intent has nothing to do with it. It’s her job and sworn oath not to allow COMSEC mistakes from escaping. There’s no room here for screw-ups.

And the question to me is, if she stored her files correctly, her personal files would have been separate from her business files. If she wanted to delete some personal files, on most computers it’s over next to page up and down. She could easily have deleted them herself. But she hired a professional company to “bleach,” she says, her personal files. If that’s the case. why are business emails missing? And why did she need her shopping list to be bleached when it was not a need to know status?

She over killed one part and went lackadaisical on the important part? If she did, she’s either dumber than dirt or dangerous. And for that reason, just as scary in a position of authority. She wouldn’t be safe as dog catcher.

red


38 posted on 09/03/2016 8:09:31 AM PDT by Redwood71
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson