I wouldn't do it, I just wouldn't do it.
This is Trump we’re talking about. And they would be wise to walk on egg shells around him.
All he has to do is show their gotcha questions for what they are and then attack killary with whatever gotcha point he wants. Sure they can kill his mic in front of the whole country and that will attract even more voters to his banner.
If they repeat that process, he repeats his until they finally get that they are getting their candidate beaten up. She will probably excuse her way out of more debates.
I’m with you. Until it is a true bipartisan composition, not in a million years.
It is just a setup.
It’s almost as if they announced the Matt Lauer crap yesterday, to soften us for this nonsense.
Trump does fine with debates and reporters
that’s exactly what Hillary! wants: no debates.
I don’t *like* the selection of moderators, but The Donald should be able to handle himself, not so sure about Hillary! I’d take my chances.
Thesee are a bunch of cap mods, including wallace. Where’s Priebus??? This is in his Wheelhouse to fix.
Oh yes he should do the debates!!! He has been doing tons of interviews and answering gottha questions by scores already...but in the debates the press can’t edit his answers!
Trump is one gutsy guy—he will go where angels fear to tread. Why? Gotcha Questions will confirm his view (and his followers) that the Media is biased and will show how they are working overtime to get Hillary Elected. If he can hold them off—he will win the election. He must keep his cool, be up on his game. Don’t worry—they will give Hillary the questions before hand. Look for questions on Foreign Leaders names—Like who is the president of Bauchastan? Who is the Prime Minester of Butan? And if Trump doesn’t pronounce the name right they will jump all over him. This is a trick they used on Bush.
All bad.
I would say no, and ask for one leftist moderated debate, one Brietbart moderated debate and one middle of the Road (Fox news) debate.
He better control this.
These outlets are using them as revenue enhancers, not public service.