The Clintons lie about this and hope people are too stupid to understand the truth.
It depends on what the meaning of “editing” is. That Team Hillary chose to respond on a Sunday to this shows there is more than just smoke here.
Who you gonna believe, me or your lyin' eyes?
Imagine if Trump had been “just listed on the masthead” of a KKK publication. Seriously? Just being listed on the masthead is their excuse? (And the American media and the sheeple buy this?)
No one dug this up until just now??
I’m to the point on this stuff that the only way I’d not believe it is if they admitted to it.
Let's say for argument this is true. So being a 'figurehead' for a muslim publication that says the U.S. was behind the 9/11 muslim terrorist attacks is ... better?
Lat’s not be stupid. Being listed is being supportive.
Did she collect a pay check for being listed as an editor? She seems to get pay checks from just about everyone she ever crossed paths with.
These bastards lie, knowing that other democrat wackos and the media will repeat and support the lie.
The Clintons lie about this and hope people are too stupid to understand the truth.
over the years the xlintonista regime's strategy has been:
tell a lie
if questioned about it
tell a bigger lie
if questioned about that
tell an even bigger lie
keep escalating the size of the lie
finally the people say: that is so bizarre & outrageous it can't be a lie.
The title says it all.....
Sounds like a vast, right wing conspiracy where some radical right person infiltrated the radical magazine and placed Huma’s name on the masthead. Then they hypnotized all the magazine editors and publishers to not notice - or to not hear anyone else that noticed and told them. Then they hypnotized Huma, Hillary, the news media and all the DNC to not notice and to not hear anyone else that noticed and told them. Then... Oh, never mind this is just too ridiculous.
If her name was just there for show, how did it get removed?
Since when is the editor NOT the editor?
...whereas the Democrats have held over the years that as a Harvard Law student, Obama did edit the Law Review he was the Chief Editor of, whereas he did not.
Truth is relative.
My understanding is that her name was simply listed on the masthead in that period, Clinton spokesman Nick Merrill said hours after The Post broke the bombshell story. She did not play a role in editing at the publication
So you are saying her morals are so deformed that she accepts a title and most probably a paycheck and does absolutely no work for it.
How is that different from so many of the democrat/republican parasites that now infest the nation?
Maybe you were MORE than editor? Maybe you wrote articles? Did you? Oh, of course not! You were just the non-editing "editor."
Sounds very similar to the party line that Obama sat in church with the racist Rev Wright for decades but never heard his anti-Americanism and racism.