Posted on 08/19/2016 5:26:15 AM PDT by SJackson
In 1983, Marxist unrest in the tiny Caribbean Island of Grenada threatened the safety of roughly 1,000 Americans residing there. Many of them were medical students at the islands medical school. President Ronald Reagan did not hesitate. He dispatched 6,000 U.S. troops to evacuate the Americans and secure the island. Within a week, U.S. objectives were met. The Americans were safe, the Cuban mercenaries were expelled and rule of law was reestablished.
There was a time when being a U.S citizen held significance and carried weight, when two-bit dictators and petty thugs would think twice before harming Americans. In the age of Obama, that time remains but a distant, faded memory. Holding U.S. citizenship now is not only meaningless, it paints a broad target on ones back. The Benghazi debacle serves to reinforce this view.
The brazen, preplanned September 11, 2012 terror attack against the American consulate in Benghazi needlessly cost the lives of four Americans, including U.S. Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens, the first U.S. ambassador killed in the line of duty since 1979. Obamas State Department, run by his inept and malevolent secretary of state, is largely to blame. Indecisiveness, bureaucratic bungling and poor intelligence led to a series of mistakes that hampered relief efforts.
The extreme ineptitude demonstrated by the Obama-Clinton duo in protecting Americans during the Benghazi fiasco recently repeated itself in a disturbing incident eerily similar to events unfolding on that hot September night. On July 11, rampaging South Sudanese soldiers savages would be a more appropriate term attacked a sprawling hotel compound in the capital city of Juba inhabited by Western relief workers, journalists and South Sudanese elites. In the following 24 hours, the Westerners as well as some South Sudanese were forced to endure gang rape and torture. One South Sudanese journalist was shot dead while an American woman was raped by as many as 15 South Sudanese soldiers. Americans were singled out for particular cruelty.
Unbelievably, the carnage could have been prevented. There was a significant United Nations force staffed by Chinese, Ethiopian and Nepalese troops stationed nearby, just a few minutes drive away. Minutes after the South Sudanese soldiers forced their way into the Terrain Hotel complex; UN forces as well as the U.S. embassy in Juba were deluged with frantic calls for help. Emails, Facebook messages and texts were inexplicably ignored. One American who succeeded in escaping in the early stages of the assault made his way to the nearby UN compound but his pleas too fell on deaf ears.
UN forces in the area utterly failed to uphold their core mission to protect civilians. The incident at the Terrain Hotel can be added to a lengthy list of similar UN failures. In 1995 Dutch troops under UN command, stationed in the Bosnian city of Srebrenica, presided over the worst post-World War II massacre on European soil. They stood by as 7,000 people were systematically massacred by forces commanded by the Serb war criminal, Radko Mladic. Their culpability for their inaction was confirmed when a Dutch court found Holland civilly liable for at least three of those deaths.
On the Golan Heights, UN troops meant to serve as a buffer between Israeli and Syrian forces, shamefully unraveled at the first sight of Muslim militants approaching their positions during the ongoing Syrian civil war.
In 1957, the Israel Defense Forces withdrew from the Sinai Peninsula after seizing the area during the 1956 Suez war. Their withdrawal however, was conditioned on UN forces taking up strategic buffering positions in Sinai to deter future Egyptian aggression. In May 1967, those UN troops packed up and vacated after the Egyptians ordered them to do so thus precipitating the Six-Day War. There are dozens of additional examples too numerous to note in this piece detailing similar UN failings. These shortcomings are the rule rather than the exception when it comes to UN operations.
The UN said that the instant matter is currently under investigation. Needless to say, I do not have much faith in UN investigations.
The U.S. embassy too failed to adequately protect its citizens. A State Department spokeswoman said that the embassy was not in a position to intervene. Samantha Power, the U.S. ambassador to the United Nations said that the embassy reached out to South Sudanese officials who sent a response force to the site to stop the attack.
Powers statement is pure hogwash. The South Sudanese arrived some 24 hours later, when the violence had already subsided. In point of fact, the United States was aware of the extreme volatility in the region and had experienced problems in the past. In 2013 and then again 2014 Navy SEALS and Marines were dispatched to South Sudan to evacuate and protect U.S. citizens. And on July 12, just one day following the Terrain compound attack, 40 soldiers from the U.S. Marine Corps crisis-response force based out of Morón, Spain were dispatched to South Sudan in an effort to protect the U.S. embassy and American personnel. The salient question is why werent they deployed sooner?
If you'd like to be on or off, please FR mail me.
..................
But we will pay 100 Million Dollars ransom for one.
Well, I guess the moral of the story is, don’t be a relief worker or journalist. And don’t go to these cesspool countries.
Relying on UN ‘Peacekeepers’ for any decisive or moral action is stupid, and, given current US leadership, relying on the US Embassy was equally foolish.
“Well, I guess the moral of the story is, dont be a relief worker or journalist. And dont go to these cesspool countries.”
That would be my advice, which also extends to parts of many American cities.
Americans are not allowed weapons in any country where I applied for work. Yet you can see small children with AK’s. When the Jihad heated up I retired.
Just another reason to leave the UN
It is unfortunate that the western press won’t carry this story. But then I guess all cultures are the same
The only thing the UN does well is attack and sanction Israel, the country it should not be sanctioning.
The are beyond corrupt and beyond worthless.
The only upside to it is that one day they will no longer exist
I would aargue the thing the UN does best is collect salaries
Thanks for posting. I saw this early this morning, but opted to wait for morning FR posting.
No more protection for American peons out of Conus. Just like Benghazi Americans are on their own.
The UN is a tool for Satan.
Destroy islam
The U.N. is nothing more than a pit to throw good money for nothing. Not even entertainment. What reason is there to remain?
A lot of people have had high hopes for South Sudan, but it has been pretty disappointing so far.
Shut up. And accept a real big stick.
No, I think the moral of the story is that if America does not have a President with the balls to immediately order whatever measures are necessary to protect American citizens from enemy assault, we can expect to see atrocities such as happened in Benghazi.
The best thing our world and especially America can do about the UN is close it down. Send all the officials and hangers oners back to where they came from. It will save America a LOT of money and a LOT of “feriners” breaking our laws, without having to answer for their misdoings. Let the countries police themselves. Over the years the un “protectors” have been nothing but trouble.
Some one could buy the buildings for offices or apartments and put the tax money into our economy. All the un members want to do is make this a one-world-government, with them
governing. NOT a good idea.
[[I would aargue the thing the UN does best is collect salaries]]
Looking at it again I have to agree that you are right on this one.
What they do best is collect salaries for creating solutions to problems that do not exist (like global warming).
The second thing they do best is make problems that do exist worse. Like feeding and encouraging the fake palestinians to harm their victims (both their own people and Israeli people) siding with savages and blaming the victims .
Billions of dollars spent creating more problems.
We so need to get out of the UN , stop funding this worthless hole we pour money into , and KICK every last one of these no good UN leaches out of this country.
DECEMBER 2014 : (COMMUNIST CHINA INFANTRY BATTALION JOINS UN PEACEKEEPERS IN SOUTH SUDAN) In December [2014], a Chinese infantry battalion joined U.N. peacekeepers in South Sudan, the first time China had sent an infantry battalion on a peacekeeping mission. According to the Chinese publication Xinhuanet, it signaled “Beijing’s growing role in world affairs,” TheDiplomat reported.
By providing military support in war-torn regions, China indicates its rise on the global stage, as it no longer restricts its power to regional affairs. The Chinese government views its rise in peacekeeping forces as commensurate with international expectations of increased Chinese involvement in promoting peace and stability.
-—— http://afkinsider.com/104034/why-is-china-committing-8000-more-troops-to-un-peacekeeping/
Why Is China Committing 8000 More Troops To UN Peacekeeping?, By Dana Sanchez, Published: September 29, 2015, 11:45 am
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.