Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Always Correct Election Forecast Model Predicts Donald Trump WINS, 51%-48% (66% chance GOP victory)
Washington Examiner ^ | 8/12/16 12:15 PM | By PAUL BEDARD (@SECRETSBEDARD

Posted on 08/15/2016 11:44:24 AM PDT by drewh

Republican Donald Trump should win the presidency by a slim margin according to a model that has accurately predicted the popular vote since 1988.

Using several standards to make his prediction, Alan Abramowitz's "Time for Change" model done for the University of Virginia's Center for Politics "Crystal Ball" shows Trump winning 51.4 percent to 48.6 percent for Hillary Clinton.

He added that the model shows a 66 percent chance of a Trump victory.

"Based on a predicted vote share of 48.6 percent for the incumbent party, these results indicate that Trump should be a clear but not overwhelming favorite to defeat Clinton: There should be about a 66 percent chance of a Republican victory," Abramowitz added.

Stay abreast of the latest developments from nation's capital and beyond with curated News Alerts from the Washington Examiner news desk and delivered to your inbox.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonexaminer.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: District of Columbia
KEYWORDS: 2016electionpoll; 2016polls; crystalball; trumppoll
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last
Larry Sabato thinks this as well..
1 posted on 08/15/2016 11:44:24 AM PDT by drewh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: drewh

Nice


2 posted on 08/15/2016 11:47:02 AM PDT by conservativepoet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: drewh
according to a model that has accurately predicted the popular vote since 1988.

the popular vote does not select the president.

3 posted on 08/15/2016 11:47:53 AM PDT by VRWCmember
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: drewh

I don’t buy any poll at all; again, Conservatives are most likely to not answer a poll for fear of repercussions.


4 posted on 08/15/2016 11:48:00 AM PDT by CincyRichieRich (Have Faith...If you have none, pray and ask Him for more.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: drewh

So the Libertarians and Green idiots are not going to get a single vote? You may color me skeptical.


5 posted on 08/15/2016 11:48:27 AM PDT by NRx (A man of integrity passes his father's civilization to his son, without selling it off to strangers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: drewh

Huh? Sabato has been all over, IIRC, saying Trump is losing the Electoral college by landslide proportions.

I don’t like these kind of predictions—one way or another.

Don’t set yourself up as the victor or depress yourself as the loser.

Pray, vote, persuade in a winsome manner why Trump is better than Hitlery.

We rely too much on “experts”. They’ve gotten us in trouble.


6 posted on 08/15/2016 11:48:40 AM PDT by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: drewh

Yup. That’s about how I see it.

That 47% that always votes FREE SH*T will continue to vote FREE SH*T even if their nominee is having convulsions on the stage at her rally.

Add 1% for the #NeverTrumpers and others too afraid of being labeled RAAAAACISTS.

Trump will win, but it won’t be a runaway landslide.
These riots in Milwaukee are all but assuring that.


7 posted on 08/15/2016 11:49:17 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

And register!

I believe Trump’s message resonates with people who haven’t felt included in the political process for years...and many of these people may have moved since last voting, or otherwise fallen off the rolls. Persuade...and ask if the person is registered/knows where to vote.


8 posted on 08/15/2016 11:51:57 AM PDT by lacrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: drewh

Later in the article:

“However, in an unusual move, Abramowitz is throwing his own model under the bus and suggesting that Clinton will win because Trump is so different from past presidential candidates and has such high unfavorability ratings that his election forecast basics can’t be trusted.”


9 posted on 08/15/2016 11:53:51 AM PDT by DeFault User
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

I tHink Sabato agrees with the popular vote total projections, the possibility still exists that the electoral college could get messed up. I’ve seen some 269-269 state combinations out there, which would then go to House or Senate


10 posted on 08/15/2016 11:54:17 AM PDT by drewh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: drewh

11 posted on 08/15/2016 11:55:27 AM PDT by smoothsailing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

Pray, vote, persuade

a new Julia Roberts movie...? Can’t wait...


12 posted on 08/15/2016 11:56:04 AM PDT by IrishBrigade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: drewh

Everyone is ‘always correct’ until they are not. I’ve seen numerous ones on the other side too. Since the left controls the media and can spin any story they like over and over, even if Trump is up by 5%, they can still overcome him, and I’m not even talking about voter fraud, which is also expected.


13 posted on 08/15/2016 11:57:31 AM PDT by tony75034
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: drewh

“I’ve seen some 269-269 state combinations out there, which would then go to House or Senate.”

That woujd be interesting, very interesting.

There would be good chance that neither Trump nor Clinton would emerge as the winner.


14 posted on 08/15/2016 11:58:06 AM PDT by Timpanagos1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

LOL...there’s nothing more to say, just capital LOL...


15 posted on 08/15/2016 11:58:20 AM PDT by IrishBrigade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: drewh
I’ve seen some 269-269 state combinations out there, which would then go to House or Senate

The RINOS would throw-in and cut a deal with Hillary. They'd elect her POTUS. CW 2.0 starts five minutes later.


16 posted on 08/15/2016 11:59:05 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

that’s what Im afraid of, Paul Ryan cuts a deal with Hillary Rotten for trillions of porkulus spending in the first 100 days


17 posted on 08/15/2016 12:01:49 PM PDT by drewh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: CincyRichieRich
< I don’t buy any poll at all; again, Conservatives are most likely to not answer a poll for fear of repercussions.

Same here. Ask a different person in a different specific demographic and you already know the answer to the question. The results can be manipulated so easily only idiots would believe them and they do.

18 posted on 08/15/2016 12:02:10 PM PDT by jsanders2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: drewh

Is that with the fraud factored in?


19 posted on 08/15/2016 12:02:36 PM PDT by JimRed (Is it 1776 yet? TERM LIMITS, now and forever! Build the Wall, NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: drewh

I tHink Sabato agrees with the popular vote total projections, the possibility still exists that the electoral college could get messed up.

a long time ago Larry Sabato and his group had Clinton winning the EC 347-191, Trump losing North Carolina from the Romney haul...


20 posted on 08/15/2016 12:04:40 PM PDT by IrishBrigade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson